Antonio Rueda-Dominguez
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Antonio Rueda-Dominguez has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz
Medical Oncology Department Hospital Regional Universitario Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Málaga (IBIMA) Málaga Spain
2 shared publications - Isabel Barragán
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Grupo B-05, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-Plataforma BIONAND (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), 29010 Málaga, Spain
2 shared publications - Javier Oliver
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Grupo B-05, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-Plataforma BIONAND (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), 29010 Málaga, Spain
1 shared publication - José Miguel Jurado
Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
1 shared publication - Laura Gálvez-Carvajal
UGC Oncología Intercentros, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Malaga, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
1 shared publication - Marta Muñoz-Ayllón
Unidad Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Málaga, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma at First Diagnosis: Review of the Literature
Metastatic melanoma (MM) is a pathological entity with a very poor prognosis that, until a few decades ago, had a low response rate to systemic treatments. Fortunately, in the last few years, new therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the mainstays of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, both clinical evolution and drug efficacy in melanoma patients are very different depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. In fact, the aggressiveness of melanoma is different depending on whether it debuts directly as metastatic disease or if what occurs is a relapse after a first diagnosis at an early stage, although the biological determinants are largely unknown. Another key aspect in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma at first diagnosis strives in the different prognosis of melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) compared to melanoma of known primary (MPK). Understanding the mechanisms behind this, and the repercussion of implementing targeted and immune therapies in this specific form is crucial for designing diagnosis and treatment decision algorithms that optimize the current strategies. In this review article, we recapitulate the information available thus far regarding the epidemiology and response to immunotherapy treatments or targeted therapy in patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma as a first diagnosis, with especial emphasis on the emerging specific information of the subpopulation formed by MUP patients.
Open AccessTreatment of Metastatic Melanoma at First Diagnosis: Review of the Literature
Metastatic melanoma (MM) is a pathological entity with a very poor prognosis that, until a few decades ago, had a low response rate to systemic treatments. Fortunately, in the last few years, new therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the mainstays of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, both clinical evolution and drug efficacy in melanoma patients are very different depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. In fact, the aggressiveness of melanoma is different depending on whether it debuts directly as metastatic disease or if what occurs is a relapse after a first diagnosis at an early stage, although the biological determinants are largely unknown. Another key aspect in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma at first diagnosis strives in the different prognosis of melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) compared to melanoma of known primary (MPK). Understanding the mechanisms behind this, and the repercussion of implementing targeted and immune therapies in this specific form is crucial for designing diagnosis and treatment decision algorithms that optimize the current strategies. In this review article, we recapitulate the information available thus far regarding the epidemiology and response to immunotherapy treatments or targeted therapy in patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma as a first diagnosis, with especial emphasis on the emerging specific information of the subpopulation formed by MUP patients.
- Open Access
- 15 October 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 9 (10) , 1478
Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for the Characterisation and Early Detection of the Field Cancerization Effect in Patients with Oral Cavity Carcinoma
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) constitutes approximately 25% of all head and neck cancer, for which the consumption of tobacco and alcohol are the main associated risk factors. The field cancerization effect of OSCC is one of the main reasons for the poor survival rates associated with this disease. Despite some advances, its ccharacterization and early diagnosis continue to challenge modern oncology, and the goal of improving the prognosis remains to be achieved. Among new early diagnostic tools for OSCC that have been proposed, liquid biopsy appears to be an ideal candidate, as studies have shown that the analysis of blood and saliva provides promising data for the early detection of relapses or second tumours.
- 15 October 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 9 (10) , 1478
Open AccessLiquid Biopsy as a Tool for the Characterisation and Early Detection of the Field Cancerization Effect in Patients with Oral Cavity Carcinoma
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) constitutes approximately 25% of all head and neck cancer, for which the consumption of tobacco and alcohol are the main associated risk factors. The field cancerization effect of OSCC is one of the main reasons for the poor survival rates associated with this disease. Despite some advances, its ccharacterization and early diagnosis continue to challenge modern oncology, and the goal of improving the prognosis remains to be achieved. Among new early diagnostic tools for OSCC that have been proposed, liquid biopsy appears to be an ideal candidate, as studies have shown that the analysis of blood and saliva provides promising data for the early detection of relapses or second tumours.