Mahdi Panahi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Mahdi Panahi has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Saro Lee
Principal Researcher, Geoscience Data Research Department, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
5 shared publications - Fatemeh Rezaie
K. N. Toosi University of Technology
3 shared publications - Ali Asghar Alesheikh
Department of GIS, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
1 shared publication - Arip Syaripudin Nur
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA
1 shared publication - Chang-Wook Lee
Professor, Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Changhyun Jun
School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 29 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
- Vol. 36 (12) , 4287-4310
Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran
- 29 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
- Vol. 36 (12) , 4287-4310
Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran
- 15 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 114 (2) , 1247-1283
Novel hybrid models by coupling support vector regression (SVR) with meta-heuristic algorithms (WOA and GWO) for flood susceptibility mapping
- 15 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 114 (2) , 1247-1283
Novel hybrid models by coupling support vector regression (SVR) with meta-heuristic algorithms (WOA and GWO) for flood susceptibility mapping
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 305, 114367
Convolutional neural network (CNN) with metaheuristic optimization algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Icheon, South Korea
- 1 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 305, 114367
Top Cited PapersConvolutional neural network (CNN) with metaheuristic optimization algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Icheon, South Korea
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Pollution
- Vol. 292 (Pt B) , 118385
Radon potential mapping in Jangsu-gun, South Korea using probabilistic and deep learning algorithms
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Pollution
- Vol. 292 (Pt B) , 118385
Radon potential mapping in Jangsu-gun, South Korea using probabilistic and deep learning algorithms
- Open Access
- 7 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 13 (24) , 4966
Hybrids of Support Vector Regression with Grey Wolf Optimizer and Firefly Algorithm for Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility
Landslides are one of the most frequent and important natural disasters in the world. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the landslide susceptibility in Zhenping County using a hybrid of support vector regression (SVR) with grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and firefly algorithm (FA) by frequency ratio (FR) preprocessed. Therefore, a landslide inventory composed of 140 landslides and 16 landslide conditioning factors is compiled as a landslide database. Among these landslides, 70% (98) landslides were randomly selected as the training dataset of the model, and the other landslides (42) were used to verify the model. The 16 landslide conditioning factors include elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landslide, rainfall, soil and lithology. The conditioning factors selection and spatial correlation analysis were carried out by using the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method and the frequency ratio (FR) algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and kappa data of the training dataset and validation dataset are used to evaluate the prediction ability and the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages of landslide susceptibility maps. The results show that the SVR-GWO model (AUROC = 0.854) has the best performance in landslide spatial prediction, followed by the SVR-FA (AUROC = 0.838) and SVR models (AUROC = 0.818). The hybrid models of SVR-GWO and SVR-FA improve the performance of the single SVR model, and all three models have good prospects for regional-scale landslide spatial modeling.
- 7 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 13 (24) , 4966
Open AccessHybrids of Support Vector Regression with Grey Wolf Optimizer and Firefly Algorithm for Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility
Landslides are one of the most frequent and important natural disasters in the world. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the landslide susceptibility in Zhenping County using a hybrid of support vector regression (SVR) with grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and firefly algorithm (FA) by frequency ratio (FR) preprocessed. Therefore, a landslide inventory composed of 140 landslides and 16 landslide conditioning factors is compiled as a landslide database. Among these landslides, 70% (98) landslides were randomly selected as the training dataset of the model, and the other landslides (42) were used to verify the model. The 16 landslide conditioning factors include elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landslide, rainfall, soil and lithology. The conditioning factors selection and spatial correlation analysis were carried out by using the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method and the frequency ratio (FR) algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and kappa data of the training dataset and validation dataset are used to evaluate the prediction ability and the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages of landslide susceptibility maps. The results show that the SVR-GWO model (AUROC = 0.854) has the best performance in landslide spatial prediction, followed by the SVR-FA (AUROC = 0.838) and SVR models (AUROC = 0.818). The hybrid models of SVR-GWO and SVR-FA improve the performance of the single SVR model, and all three models have good prospects for regional-scale landslide spatial modeling.