Tulio J. Lopera
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Tulio J. Lopera has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Juan Carlos Alzate-Ángel
Grupo Inmunovirologia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
2 shared publicationsMaría T. Rugeles
Grupo Inmunovirologia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
2 shared publications- Wbeimar Aguilar-Jimenez
Grupo Inmunovirología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
2 shared publications Andrés Hernández
Grupo de Inmunología Celular e Inmunogenética, Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
1 shared publication- Diana Castaño
Grupo de Inmunología Celular e Inmunogenética, Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
1 shared publication Diana Gil
IPS Artmédica, Medellín, Colombia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
- Vol. 13, 100387
Aggrecan and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in extracellular vesicles of patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis
- 9 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
- Vol. 13, 100387
Open AccessAggrecan and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in extracellular vesicles of patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis
- Open Access
- 27 April 2022
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology Spectrum
- Vol. 10 (2) , e0196221
The Usefulness of Antigen Testing in Predicting Contagiousness in COVID-19
The importance of our results is the excellent agreement between the Standard Q COVID-19 antigen test and the viral culture, indicating that it is important as a marker of contagiousness. Due to its high positive predictive value in situations of a high prevalence of infection, positive results do not require confirmation with another test.
- 27 April 2022
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology Spectrum
- Vol. 10 (2) , e0196221
Open AccessThe Usefulness of Antigen Testing in Predicting Contagiousness in COVID-19
The importance of our results is the excellent agreement between the Standard Q COVID-19 antigen test and the viral culture, indicating that it is important as a marker of contagiousness. Due to its high positive predictive value in situations of a high prevalence of infection, positive results do not require confirmation with another test.
- Open Access
The usefulness of antigen testing in predicting contagiousness in COVID-19
Increasing the diagnostic capacity of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection) is required to improve case detection, reduce COVID-19 expansion, and boost the world economy. Rapid antigen detection tests are cheaper and easier to implement, but their diagnostic performance has been questioned compared to RT-PCR. Here, we evaluate the performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 antigen test for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection and predicting contagiousness compared to RT-PCR and viral culture, respectively. The antigen test was 100.0% specific but only 40.9% sensitive for diagnosing infection compared to RT-PCR. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 contagiousness is highly unlikely with a negative antigen test since it exhibited a negative predictive value of 99.9% than viral culture. Furthermore, a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 18.1 in RT-PCR was shown to be the one that best predicts contagiousness (AUC 97.6%). Thus, screening people with antigen testing is a good approach to prevent SARS-CoV-2 contagion and allow returning to daily activities.
Open AccessThe usefulness of antigen testing in predicting contagiousness in COVID-19
Increasing the diagnostic capacity of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection) is required to improve case detection, reduce COVID-19 expansion, and boost the world economy. Rapid antigen detection tests are cheaper and easier to implement, but their diagnostic performance has been questioned compared to RT-PCR. Here, we evaluate the performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 antigen test for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection and predicting contagiousness compared to RT-PCR and viral culture, respectively. The antigen test was 100.0% specific but only 40.9% sensitive for diagnosing infection compared to RT-PCR. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 contagiousness is highly unlikely with a negative antigen test since it exhibited a negative predictive value of 99.9% than viral culture. Furthermore, a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 18.1 in RT-PCR was shown to be the one that best predicts contagiousness (AUC 97.6%). Thus, screening people with antigen testing is a good approach to prevent SARS-CoV-2 contagion and allow returning to daily activities.