Khaled Bin Satter

Renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC) comprises over 75% of all renal tumors and arises in the epithelial cells of the proximal convoluted tubule. Molecularly ccRCC is characterized by copy number alterations (CNAs) such as the loss of chromosome 3p and VHL inactivation. Additional driver mutations (SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, and others) promote genomic instability and tumor cell metastasis through the dysregulation of various metabolic and immune-response pathways. Many researchers identified mutation, gene expression, and proteomic signatures for early diagnosis and prognostics for ccRCC. Despite a tremendous influx of data regarding DNA alterations, gene expression, and protein expression, the incorporation of these analyses for diagnosis and prognosis of RCC into the clinical application has not been implemented yet. In this review, we focused on the molecular changes associated with ccRCC development, along with gene expression and protein signatures, to emphasize the utilization of these molecular profiles in clinical practice. These findings, in the context of machine learning and precision medicine, may help to overcome some of the barriers encountered for implementing molecular profiles of tumors into the diagnosis and treatment of ccRCC.

Renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC) comprises over 75% of all renal tumors and arises in the epithelial cells of the proximal convoluted tubule. Molecularly ccRCC is characterized by copy number alterations (CNAs) such as the loss of chromosome 3p and VHL inactivation. Additional driver mutations (SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, and others) promote genomic instability and tumor cell metastasis through the dysregulation of various metabolic and immune-response pathways. Many researchers identified mutation, gene expression, and proteomic signatures for early diagnosis and prognostics for ccRCC. Despite a tremendous influx of data regarding DNA alterations, gene expression, and protein expression, the incorporation of these analyses for diagnosis and prognosis of RCC into the clinical application has not been implemented yet. In this review, we focused on the molecular changes associated with ccRCC development, along with gene expression and protein signatures, to emphasize the utilization of these molecular profiles in clinical practice. These findings, in the context of machine learning and precision medicine, may help to overcome some of the barriers encountered for implementing molecular profiles of tumors into the diagnosis and treatment of ccRCC.

Interleukin-1 antagonism is a proposed biomarker and potential therapy for the delay and/or treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated the role of circulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in a prospectively monitored cohort of T1D patients. In order to determine a mechanistic association between IL-1ra and T1D, we performed co-localization analyses between serum IL-1ra protein quantitative trait loci and T1D genome-wide analysis studies. Adjusting for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes, first degree relative status, gender, and age, serum levels of IL-1ra were lower in subjects who progressed to T1D compared to the controls (p = 0.023). Our results suggest that females have higher levels of IL-1ra compared to males (p = 0.005). The 2q14.1 region associated with serum IL-1ra levels is not associated with a risk of developing T1D. Our data suggest that IL-1 antagonism by IL-1ra is not an effective therapy in T1D, but IL-1ra may be a biomarker for progression to T1D.

Malignant chromophobe renal cancer (chRCC) and benign oncocytoma (RO) are two renal tumor types difficult to differentiate using histology and immunohistochemistry-based methods because of their similarity in appearance. We previously developed a transcriptomics-based classification pipeline with “Chromophobe-Oncocytoma Gene Signature” (COGS) on a single-molecule counting platform. Renal cancer patients (n = 32, chRCC = 17, RO = 15) were recruited from Augusta University Medical Center (AUMC). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks from their excised tumors were collected. We created a custom single-molecule counting code set for COGS to assay RNA from FFPE blocks. Utilizing hematoxylin-eosin stain, pathologists were able to correctly classify these tumor types (91.8%). Our unsupervised learning with UMAP (Uniform manifold approximation and projection, accuracy = 0.97) and hierarchical clustering (accuracy = 1.0) identified two clusters congruent with their histology. We next developed and compared four supervised models (random forest, support vector machine, generalized linear model with L2 regularization, and supervised UMAP). Supervised UMAP has shown to classify all the cases correctly (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1, accuracy = 1) followed by random forest models (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1, accuracy = 1). This pipeline can be used as a clinical tool by pathologists to differentiate chRCC from RO.

Malignant chromophobe renal cancer (chRCC) and benign oncocytoma (RO) are two renal tumor types difficult to differentiate using histology and immunohistochemistry-based methods because of their similarity in appearance. We previously developed a transcriptomics-based classification pipeline with “ Chromophobe-Oncocytoma Gene Signature” (COGS) on a single-molecule counting platform. Renal cancer patients (n=32, chRCC=17, RO=15) were recruited from Augusta University Medical Center (AUMC). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks from their excised tumors were collected. We created a custom single-molecule counting code set for COGS to assay RNA from FFPE blocks. Utilizing hematoxylin-eosin stain, pathologists were able to correctly classify these tumor types (91.8%). Our unsupervised learning with UMAP (accuracy = 0.97) and hierarchical clustering (accuracy = 1.0) identified two clusters congruent with their histology. We next developed and compared four supervised models (random forest, support vector machine, generalized linear model with L2 regularization, and supervised UMAP). Supervised UMAP has shown to classify all the cases correctly (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1, accuracy = 1) followed by random forest models (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1, accuracy = 1). This pipeline can be used as a clinical tool by pathologists to differentiate chRCC from RO. Simple Summary: We previously reported a gene signature, “Chromophobe-Oncocytoma Gene Signature” (COGS), to differentiate Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from oncocytoma. Here, we report our results on a single-molecule counting assay with machine learning as a diagnostic pipeline to differentiate chromophobe and oncocytoma tumors utilizing the COGS signature to be used in clinics.

Publicly available gene expression datasets were analyzed to develop a chromophobe and oncocytoma related gene signature (COGS) to distinguish chRCC from RO. The datasets GSE11151, GSE19982, GSE2109, GSE8271 and GSE11024 were combined into a discovery dataset. The transcriptomic differences were identified with unsupervised learning in the discovery dataset (97.8% accuracy) with density based UMAP (DBU). The top 30 genes were identified by univariate gene expression analysis and ROC analysis, to create a gene signature called COGS. COGS, combined with DBU, was able to differentiate chRCC from RO in the discovery dataset with an accuracy of 97.8%. The classification accuracy of COGS was validated in an independent meta-dataset consisting of TCGA-KICH and GSE12090, where COGS could differentiate chRCC from RO with 100% accuracy. The differentially expressed genes were involved in carbohydrate metabolism, transcriptomic regulation by TP53, beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling, and cytokine (IL-4 and IL-13) signaling highly active in cancer cells. Using multiple datasets and machine learning, we constructed and validated COGS as a tool that can differentiate chRCC from RO and complement histology in routine clinical practice to distinguish these two tumors.

Development of complications in type 1 diabetes patients can be reduced by modifying risk factors. We used a cross-sectional cohort of 1646 patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to develop a clinical risk score for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), autonomic neuropathy (AN), retinopathy (DR), and nephropathy (DN). Of these patients, 199 (12.1%) had DPN, 63 (3.8%) had AN, 244 (14.9%) had DR, and 88 (5.4%) had DN. We selected five variables to include in each of the four microvascular complications risk models: age, age of T1D diagnosis, duration of T1D, and average systolic blood pressure and HbA1C over the last three clinic visits. These variables were selected for their strong evidence of association with diabetic complications in the literature and because they are modifiable risk factors. We found the optimism-corrected R2 and Harrell’s C statistic were 0.39 and 0.87 for DPN, 0.24 and 0.86 for AN, 0.49 and 0.91 for DR, and 0.22 and 0.83 for DN, respectively. This tool was built to help inform patients of their current risk of microvascular complications and to motivate patients to control their HbA1c and systolic blood pressure in order to reduce their risk of these complications.

Gene expression profiling has been shown to be comparable to other molecular methods for glioma classification. We sought to validate a gene-expression based glioma classification method. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue and flash frozen tissue collected at the Augusta University (AU) Pathology Department between 2000–2019 were identified and 2 mm cores were taken. The RNA was extracted from these cores after deparaffinization and bead homogenization. One hundred sixty-eight genes were evaluated in the RNA samples on the nCounter instrument. Forty-eight gliomas were classified using a supervised learning algorithm trained by using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. An ensemble of 1000 linear support vector models classified 30 glioma samples into TP1 with classification confidence of 0.99. Glioma patients in TP1 group have a poorer survival (HR (95% CI) = 4.5 (1.3–15.4), p = 0.005) with median survival time of 12.1 months, compared to non-TP1 groups. Network analysis revealed that cell cycle genes play an important role in distinguishing TP1 from non-TP1 cases and that these genes may play an important role in glioma survival. This could be a good clinical pipeline for molecular classification of gliomas.