Anna-Lovisa Nynäs
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anna-Lovisa Nynäs has a total of 119 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- William R. Newson
Department of Plant Breeding, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
4 shared publications Eva Johansson
3 shared publications- Thomas Prade
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
2 shared publications A. Bailey
1 shared publicationA. Bruce
1 shared publicationA. Geeraerd
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
- Vol. 27
Increasing protein recovery from lucerne by a second pressing step: opportunities and challenges for process and feasibility
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
- Vol. 27
Open AccessIncreasing protein recovery from lucerne by a second pressing step: opportunities and challenges for process and feasibility
- Open Access
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Food and Bioproducts Processing
- Vol. 130, 229-243
Protein fractionation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea, var. Italica) and kale (Brassica oleracea, var. Sabellica) residual leaves — A pre-feasibility assessment and evaluation of fraction phenol and fibre content
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Food and Bioproducts Processing
- Vol. 130, 229-243
Open AccessProtein fractionation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea, var. Italica) and kale (Brassica oleracea, var. Sabellica) residual leaves — A pre-feasibility assessment and evaluation of fraction phenol and fibre content
- Open Access
Protein Fractionation of Green Leaves as an Underutilized Food Source—Protein Yield and the Effect of Process Parameters
Green biomass has potential as a sustainable protein source for human consumption, due to its abundance and favorable properties of its main protein, RuBisCO. Here, protein fractionation outcomes of green leafy biomass from nine crops were evaluated using a standard protocol with three major steps: juicing, thermal precipitation, and acid precipitation. Successful protein fractionation, with a freeze-dried, resolubilized white protein isolate containing RuBisCO as the final fraction, was achieved for seven of the crops, although the amount and quality of the resulting fractions differed considerably between crops. Biomass structure was negatively correlated with successful fractionation of proteins from biomass to green juice. The proteins in carrot and cabbage leaves were strongly associated with particles in the green juice, resulting in unsuccessful fractionation. Differences in thermal stability were correlated with relatedness of the biomass types, e.g., Beta vulgaris varieties showed similar performance in thermal precipitation. The optimal pH values identified for acid precipitation of soluble leaf proteins were lower than the theoretical value for RuBisCO for all biomass types, but with clear differences between biomass types. These findings reveal the challenges in using one standard fractionation protocol for production of food proteins from all types of green biomass and indicate that a general fractionation procedure where parameters are easily adjusted based on biomass type should instead be developed.
Open AccessProtein Fractionation of Green Leaves as an Underutilized Food Source—Protein Yield and the Effect of Process Parameters
Green biomass has potential as a sustainable protein source for human consumption, due to its abundance and favorable properties of its main protein, RuBisCO. Here, protein fractionation outcomes of green leafy biomass from nine crops were evaluated using a standard protocol with three major steps: juicing, thermal precipitation, and acid precipitation. Successful protein fractionation, with a freeze-dried, resolubilized white protein isolate containing RuBisCO as the final fraction, was achieved for seven of the crops, although the amount and quality of the resulting fractions differed considerably between crops. Biomass structure was negatively correlated with successful fractionation of proteins from biomass to green juice. The proteins in carrot and cabbage leaves were strongly associated with particles in the green juice, resulting in unsuccessful fractionation. Differences in thermal stability were correlated with relatedness of the biomass types, e.g., Beta vulgaris varieties showed similar performance in thermal precipitation. The optimal pH values identified for acid precipitation of soluble leaf proteins were lower than the theoretical value for RuBisCO for all biomass types, but with clear differences between biomass types. These findings reveal the challenges in using one standard fractionation protocol for production of food proteins from all types of green biomass and indicate that a general fractionation procedure where parameters are easily adjusted based on biomass type should instead be developed.
- 10 September 2019
- Published by Wageningen Academic Publishers
Sustainable governance and management of food systems
- 10 September 2019
- Published by Wageningen Academic Publishers
Sustainable governance and management of food systems