Zeynep Neziha Ülgezen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Zeynep Neziha Ülgezen has a total of 70 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Coby van Dooremalen
Wageningen University & Research
6 shared publications - Frank van Langevelde
Department of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands
5 shared publications - Adam McVeigh
School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
2 shared publications - Alexandru Ioan Giurgiu
Department of Apiculture and Sericulture, Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2 shared publications - Alexis Beaurepaire
Institute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland
2 shared publications - Anja Tehel
General Zoology, Institute for Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Veterinary Research
Data-driven early warning system for canine leishmaniasis in the Iberian Peninsula: a one health study protocol
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Veterinary Research
Open AccessData-driven early warning system for canine leishmaniasis in the Iberian Peninsula: a one health study protocol
- Open Access
- 27 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 15 (9) , e72066
Photoperiod and Temperature as Seasonal Cues for the Initiation of Brood Rearing in Honeybees
The timing of seasonal life cycle events in many organisms is regulated by environmental cues, and understanding these relationships is essential for predicting species' responses to climate change. In honeybee colonies, brood rearing must align with floral resource availability to ensure colony growth and survival. However, the cues that initiate brood rearing remain unclear. While temperature is hypothesized to be influential, the role of photoperiod is not well understood. We used field experiment data in 2021 and 2022 from 95 colonies across eight European countries to examine how temperature and photoperiod interact to regulate the initiation of brood rearing in early spring. We found that both cues are important: longer day lengths and higher temperatures were associated with a higher probability of brood rearing, with temperature having a stronger effect under shorter day lengths and diminishing as day length increased. Notably, the strong positive effect of photoperiod suggests it may play a more prominent role than previously recognized. This interaction underscores the complexity of phenological regulation in honeybees. As global temperatures rise and seasonal patterns shift, colonies may struggle to synchronize brood rearing with floral resources. Our findings suggest that incorporating multiple environmental cues and species‐specific sensitivities may improve predictions of climate‐driven shifts in plant–pollinator interactions.
- 27 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 15 (9) , e72066
Open AccessPhotoperiod and Temperature as Seasonal Cues for the Initiation of Brood Rearing in Honeybees
The timing of seasonal life cycle events in many organisms is regulated by environmental cues, and understanding these relationships is essential for predicting species' responses to climate change. In honeybee colonies, brood rearing must align with floral resource availability to ensure colony growth and survival. However, the cues that initiate brood rearing remain unclear. While temperature is hypothesized to be influential, the role of photoperiod is not well understood. We used field experiment data in 2021 and 2022 from 95 colonies across eight European countries to examine how temperature and photoperiod interact to regulate the initiation of brood rearing in early spring. We found that both cues are important: longer day lengths and higher temperatures were associated with a higher probability of brood rearing, with temperature having a stronger effect under shorter day lengths and diminishing as day length increased. Notably, the strong positive effect of photoperiod suggests it may play a more prominent role than previously recognized. This interaction underscores the complexity of phenological regulation in honeybees. As global temperatures rise and seasonal patterns shift, colonies may struggle to synchronize brood rearing with floral resources. Our findings suggest that incorporating multiple environmental cues and species‐specific sensitivities may improve predictions of climate‐driven shifts in plant–pollinator interactions.
- Open Access
- 20 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Insectes Sociaux
- Vol. 72 (4) , 405-411
Why does resource availability matter for honeybee colonies in spring?
Honeybees are essential pollinators that provide crucial ecosystem services across agricultural and natural landscapes. However, honeybee colonies, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, are experiencing significant declines due to multiple stressors. While the parasitic mite Varroa destructor is a major threat, resource availability plays a vital role in colony health, vulnerability to stress, and social resilience. Despite its importance, the transitional period for colonies from late winter to early spring when resources are scarce and brood rearing demands high energy, is often overlooked in studies. Here, we propose that colonies are most vulnerable during this transitional period and emphasize the need for closer examination of the complex relationship between resource availability and colony status to better understand colony mortality that occur in this period. We argue that improving resource availability should be prioritized, not only for short-term colony survival but also for the long-term sustainability of honeybee populations.
- 20 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Insectes Sociaux
- Vol. 72 (4) , 405-411
Open AccessWhy does resource availability matter for honeybee colonies in spring?
Honeybees are essential pollinators that provide crucial ecosystem services across agricultural and natural landscapes. However, honeybee colonies, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, are experiencing significant declines due to multiple stressors. While the parasitic mite Varroa destructor is a major threat, resource availability plays a vital role in colony health, vulnerability to stress, and social resilience. Despite its importance, the transitional period for colonies from late winter to early spring when resources are scarce and brood rearing demands high energy, is often overlooked in studies. Here, we propose that colonies are most vulnerable during this transitional period and emphasize the need for closer examination of the complex relationship between resource availability and colony status to better understand colony mortality that occur in this period. We argue that improving resource availability should be prioritized, not only for short-term colony survival but also for the long-term sustainability of honeybee populations.
- Open Access
- 1 November 2024
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 227 (21)
Shift in distribution of division of labour in chronically stressed honeybee colonies after perturbation
Division of labour (DOL) in eusocial insects plays an important role in colony fitness. Honeybees face a variety of stressors that compromise the homeostasis of the colony and reduce survival and reproduction. Considering the significance of DOL in colony homeostasis, it is important to understand whether and how DOL may be altered as a result of chronic stress. Therefore, we tested whether honeybee colonies shift DOL in response to high infestation with the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. For this, we monitored chronically stressed and presumably low-stress colonies from April till December 2022. During the experiment, we applied a cold shock to test whether a perturbation resulted in a larger alteration in DOL in chronically stressed colonies. We found that after cold shock, there was a lower proportion of nurses in the chronically stressed colonies. For foragers, we found higher activity post-cold shock in chronically stressed colonies, but no difference between treatments in nectar inflow, suggesting less efficient foragers. Furthermore, we found that there was an accelerated task switch in chronically stressed colonies after the cold shock. The large changes after the perturbation may indicate inefficient task allocation due to chronic stress. Our study contributes to the understanding of social resilience and chronic stress responses in eusocial animals.
- 1 November 2024
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 227 (21)
Open AccessShift in distribution of division of labour in chronically stressed honeybee colonies after perturbation
Division of labour (DOL) in eusocial insects plays an important role in colony fitness. Honeybees face a variety of stressors that compromise the homeostasis of the colony and reduce survival and reproduction. Considering the significance of DOL in colony homeostasis, it is important to understand whether and how DOL may be altered as a result of chronic stress. Therefore, we tested whether honeybee colonies shift DOL in response to high infestation with the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. For this, we monitored chronically stressed and presumably low-stress colonies from April till December 2022. During the experiment, we applied a cold shock to test whether a perturbation resulted in a larger alteration in DOL in chronically stressed colonies. We found that after cold shock, there was a lower proportion of nurses in the chronically stressed colonies. For foragers, we found higher activity post-cold shock in chronically stressed colonies, but no difference between treatments in nectar inflow, suggesting less efficient foragers. Furthermore, we found that there was an accelerated task switch in chronically stressed colonies after the cold shock. The large changes after the perturbation may indicate inefficient task allocation due to chronic stress. Our study contributes to the understanding of social resilience and chronic stress responses in eusocial animals.
- Open Access
Allele Frequencies of Genetic Variants Associated with Varroa Drone Brood Resistance (DBR) in Apis mellifera Subspecies across the European Continent
Implementation of marker-assisted selection (MAS) in modern beekeeping would improve sustainability, especially in breeding programs aiming for resilience against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Selecting honey bee colonies for natural resistance traits, such as brood-intrinsic suppression of varroa mite reproduction, reduces the use of chemical acaricides while respecting local adaptation. In 2019, eight genomic variants associated with varroa non-reproduction in drone brood were discovered in a single colony from the Amsterdam Water Dune population in the Netherlands. Recently, a new study tested the applicability of these eight genetic variants for the same phenotype on a population-wide scale in Flanders, Belgium. As the properties of some variants varied between the two studies, one hypothesized that the difference in genetic ancestry of the sampled colonies may underly these contribution shifts. In order to frame this, we determined the allele frequencies of the eight genetic variants in more than 360 Apis mellifera colonies across the European continent and found that variant type allele frequencies of these variants are primarily related to the A. mellifera subspecies or phylogenetic honey bee lineage. Our results confirm that population-specific genetic markers should always be evaluated in a new population prior to using them in MAS programs.
Open AccessAllele Frequencies of Genetic Variants Associated with Varroa Drone Brood Resistance (DBR) in Apis mellifera Subspecies across the European Continent
Implementation of marker-assisted selection (MAS) in modern beekeeping would improve sustainability, especially in breeding programs aiming for resilience against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Selecting honey bee colonies for natural resistance traits, such as brood-intrinsic suppression of varroa mite reproduction, reduces the use of chemical acaricides while respecting local adaptation. In 2019, eight genomic variants associated with varroa non-reproduction in drone brood were discovered in a single colony from the Amsterdam Water Dune population in the Netherlands. Recently, a new study tested the applicability of these eight genetic variants for the same phenotype on a population-wide scale in Flanders, Belgium. As the properties of some variants varied between the two studies, one hypothesized that the difference in genetic ancestry of the sampled colonies may underly these contribution shifts. In order to frame this, we determined the allele frequencies of the eight genetic variants in more than 360 Apis mellifera colonies across the European continent and found that variant type allele frequencies of these variants are primarily related to the A. mellifera subspecies or phylogenetic honey bee lineage. Our results confirm that population-specific genetic markers should always be evaluated in a new population prior to using them in MAS programs.
- Open Access
Bridging the Gap between Field Experiments and Machine Learning: The EC H2020 B-GOOD Project as a Case Study towards Automated Predictive Health Monitoring of Honey Bee Colonies
Honey bee colonies have great societal and economic importance. The main challenge that beekeepers face is keeping bee colonies healthy under ever-changing environmental conditions. In the past two decades, beekeepers that manage colonies of Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) have become increasingly concerned by the presence of parasites and pathogens affecting the bees, the reduction in pollen and nectar availability, and the colonies’ exposure to pesticides, among others. Hence, beekeepers need to know the health condition of their colonies and how to keep them alive and thriving, which creates a need for a new holistic data collection method to harmonize the flow of information from various sources that can be linked at the colony level for different health determinants, such as bee colony, environmental, socioeconomic, and genetic statuses. For this purpose, we have developed and implemented the B-GOOD (Giving Beekeeping Guidance by computational-assisted Decision Making) project as a case study to categorize the colony’s health condition and find a Health Status Index (HSI). Using a 3-tier setup guided by work plans and standardized protocols, we have collected data from inside the colonies (amount of brood, disease load, honey harvest, etc.) and from their environment (floral resource availability). Most of the project’s data was automatically collected by the BEEP Base Sensor System. This continuous stream of data served as the basis to determine and validate an algorithm to calculate the HSI using machine learning. In this article, we share our insights on this holistic methodology and also highlight the importance of using a standardized data language to increase the compatibility between different current and future studies. We argue that the combined management of big data will be an essential building block in the development of targeted guidance for beekeepers and for the future of sustainable beekeeping.
Open AccessBridging the Gap between Field Experiments and Machine Learning: The EC H2020 B-GOOD Project as a Case Study towards Automated Predictive Health Monitoring of Honey Bee Colonies
Honey bee colonies have great societal and economic importance. The main challenge that beekeepers face is keeping bee colonies healthy under ever-changing environmental conditions. In the past two decades, beekeepers that manage colonies of Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) have become increasingly concerned by the presence of parasites and pathogens affecting the bees, the reduction in pollen and nectar availability, and the colonies’ exposure to pesticides, among others. Hence, beekeepers need to know the health condition of their colonies and how to keep them alive and thriving, which creates a need for a new holistic data collection method to harmonize the flow of information from various sources that can be linked at the colony level for different health determinants, such as bee colony, environmental, socioeconomic, and genetic statuses. For this purpose, we have developed and implemented the B-GOOD (Giving Beekeeping Guidance by computational-assisted Decision Making) project as a case study to categorize the colony’s health condition and find a Health Status Index (HSI). Using a 3-tier setup guided by work plans and standardized protocols, we have collected data from inside the colonies (amount of brood, disease load, honey harvest, etc.) and from their environment (floral resource availability). Most of the project’s data was automatically collected by the BEEP Base Sensor System. This continuous stream of data served as the basis to determine and validate an algorithm to calculate the HSI using machine learning. In this article, we share our insights on this holistic methodology and also highlight the importance of using a standardized data language to increase the compatibility between different current and future studies. We argue that the combined management of big data will be an essential building block in the development of targeted guidance for beekeepers and for the future of sustainable beekeeping.
- Open Access
- 10 January 2024
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 291 (2014) , 20232460
Stress-induced loss of social resilience in honeybee colonies and its implications on fitness
Stressors may lead to a shift in the timing of life-history events of species, causing a mismatch with optimal environmental conditions, potentially reducing fitness. In honeybees, the timing of brood rearing and nest emergence in late winter/early spring is critical as colonies need to grow fast after winter to prepare for reproduction. However, the effects of stress on these life-history events in late winter/early spring and the possible consequences are not well understood. Therefore, we tested whether (i) honeybee colonies shift timing of brood rearing and nest emergence as response to stressors, and (ii) if there is a consequent loss of social resilience, reflected in colony fitness (survival, growth and reproduction). We monitored stressed (high load of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor or nutrition restricted) colonies and presumably non-stressed colonies from the beginning of 2020 till spring of 2021. We found that honeybee colonies do not shift the timing of brood rearing and nest emergence in spring as a coping mechanism to stressors. However, we show that there is loss of social resilience in stressed colonies, leading to reduced growth and reproduction. Our study contributes to better understanding the effects of stressors on social resilience in eusocial organisms.
- 10 January 2024
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 291 (2014) , 20232460
Open AccessStress-induced loss of social resilience in honeybee colonies and its implications on fitness
Stressors may lead to a shift in the timing of life-history events of species, causing a mismatch with optimal environmental conditions, potentially reducing fitness. In honeybees, the timing of brood rearing and nest emergence in late winter/early spring is critical as colonies need to grow fast after winter to prepare for reproduction. However, the effects of stress on these life-history events in late winter/early spring and the possible consequences are not well understood. Therefore, we tested whether (i) honeybee colonies shift timing of brood rearing and nest emergence as response to stressors, and (ii) if there is a consequent loss of social resilience, reflected in colony fitness (survival, growth and reproduction). We monitored stressed (high load of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor or nutrition restricted) colonies and presumably non-stressed colonies from the beginning of 2020 till spring of 2021. We found that honeybee colonies do not shift the timing of brood rearing and nest emergence in spring as a coping mechanism to stressors. However, we show that there is loss of social resilience in stressed colonies, leading to reduced growth and reproduction. Our study contributes to better understanding the effects of stressors on social resilience in eusocial organisms.
- 12 December 2023
- Published by Wageningen University and Research
Stress diminishes social resilience in honeybee colonies
- 12 December 2023
- Published by Wageningen University and Research
Stress diminishes social resilience in honeybee colonies
- Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Current Research in Insect Science
- Vol. 1, 100021
Understanding social resilience in honeybee colonies
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Current Research in Insect Science
- Vol. 1, 100021
Open AccessUnderstanding social resilience in honeybee colonies