Caroline M. Hall
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Caroline M. Hall has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Adrian Webster
Faculty of Health, | School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
2 shared publications- Holly Northam
University of Canberra
2 shared publications - Adrian Webster
Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
1 shared publication - Anthony Cotton
School of Management, UNSW Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia
1 shared publication Holly Northam
Faculty of Health, | School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
1 shared publication- Karen Strickland
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Australian Healthcare Professionals: An Archetype for Success
Background/Objectives: Qualitative research suggests there may be identifiable characteristics that form a health professional (HCP) archetype associated with habitual seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). However, the validity of this archetype requires further investigation, ideally within a theoretical framework that can elucidate this association and its generalisability to other vaccines. This study aims to confirm key HCP archetype characteristics associated with SIV, as informed by prior qualitative research findings, and test the generalisability of the association between this archetype and SIV to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Method: A cross-sectional survey was designed and distributed to an Australian HCP sample consisting of practicing nurses, midwives, pharmacists, and medical practitioners. The anonymous online survey measured key characteristics that predict vaccination behaviour and intention. Results: Most participants (n = 173) demonstrated habitual SIV behaviour (77.91%) associated with the intention to vaccinate in the future. Survey findings supported the HCP archetype, as key constructs were associated with vaccination intention and behaviour, including heightened professional responsibility, vaccine confidence, and protection of self and patients. Furthermore, results suggested progressing vaccination intention to behaviour, overcoming vaccine complacency, is possible through the provision of free, accessible vaccination services. These critical factors were broadly generalisable to the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions: A vaccination-positive HCP archetype, supported by access to free, convenient vaccination services, was associated with the likelihood of future vaccination behaviour, including in future pandemic response scenarios. However, it will be important to ensure that HCP vaccine knowledge gaps are minimised to enhance trust in this cohort to enable broad success.
Open AccessSeasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Australian Healthcare Professionals: An Archetype for Success
Background/Objectives: Qualitative research suggests there may be identifiable characteristics that form a health professional (HCP) archetype associated with habitual seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). However, the validity of this archetype requires further investigation, ideally within a theoretical framework that can elucidate this association and its generalisability to other vaccines. This study aims to confirm key HCP archetype characteristics associated with SIV, as informed by prior qualitative research findings, and test the generalisability of the association between this archetype and SIV to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Method: A cross-sectional survey was designed and distributed to an Australian HCP sample consisting of practicing nurses, midwives, pharmacists, and medical practitioners. The anonymous online survey measured key characteristics that predict vaccination behaviour and intention. Results: Most participants (n = 173) demonstrated habitual SIV behaviour (77.91%) associated with the intention to vaccinate in the future. Survey findings supported the HCP archetype, as key constructs were associated with vaccination intention and behaviour, including heightened professional responsibility, vaccine confidence, and protection of self and patients. Furthermore, results suggested progressing vaccination intention to behaviour, overcoming vaccine complacency, is possible through the provision of free, accessible vaccination services. These critical factors were broadly generalisable to the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions: A vaccination-positive HCP archetype, supported by access to free, convenient vaccination services, was associated with the likelihood of future vaccination behaviour, including in future pandemic response scenarios. However, it will be important to ensure that HCP vaccine knowledge gaps are minimised to enhance trust in this cohort to enable broad success.
- Open Access
- 9 January 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Public Health
- p. 1-12
Australian healthcare personnel acceptance of the seasonal influenza vaccine: a qualitative exploration
Aim: Australian healthcare personnel (HCP) are a vulnerable, yet essential cohort prioritised for seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). Despite extensive SIV programs, and other health protective behaviours, high levels of influenza exposure contribute to almost 23% of HCP being infected each season. In that context, understanding determinants that maximise SIV uptake among HCP is an important but under-explored area. Subject and methods: We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with Australian HCP, primarily those most involved with vaccination procedures, including nurses, midwives, pharmacists, and medical practitioners. The question guide development was based on constructs from the Triandis Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour and an integrative review. All interviews were transcribed verbatim with the application of Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis to identify and explore pertinent themes. Results: Six distinct but inter-related themes were associated with HCP seasonal influenza vaccination behaviour. Most significantly, professional responsibility and identity appeared highly associated with positive vaccine intention, followed by vaccination convenience and ease of access. Protection, habit, risk perception, and experience and knowledge were also found to influence HCP decision making around SIV. Vaccination complacency, not hesitancy, was described as impeding the progression of vaccination intention (acceptance) to vaccine behaviours (uptake). Conclusion: Findings suggest interventions that foster professional identity, leverage camaraderie and a ‘duty of care’ to protect others may enhance SIV intention. While improved access to SIV in the workplace could promote positive vaccination behaviour, particularly if triggers or nudges are applied to prompt the vaccination habit in the presence of SIV acceptance.
- 9 January 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Public Health
- p. 1-12
Open AccessAustralian healthcare personnel acceptance of the seasonal influenza vaccine: a qualitative exploration
Aim: Australian healthcare personnel (HCP) are a vulnerable, yet essential cohort prioritised for seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV). Despite extensive SIV programs, and other health protective behaviours, high levels of influenza exposure contribute to almost 23% of HCP being infected each season. In that context, understanding determinants that maximise SIV uptake among HCP is an important but under-explored area. Subject and methods: We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with Australian HCP, primarily those most involved with vaccination procedures, including nurses, midwives, pharmacists, and medical practitioners. The question guide development was based on constructs from the Triandis Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour and an integrative review. All interviews were transcribed verbatim with the application of Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis to identify and explore pertinent themes. Results: Six distinct but inter-related themes were associated with HCP seasonal influenza vaccination behaviour. Most significantly, professional responsibility and identity appeared highly associated with positive vaccine intention, followed by vaccination convenience and ease of access. Protection, habit, risk perception, and experience and knowledge were also found to influence HCP decision making around SIV. Vaccination complacency, not hesitancy, was described as impeding the progression of vaccination intention (acceptance) to vaccine behaviours (uptake). Conclusion: Findings suggest interventions that foster professional identity, leverage camaraderie and a ‘duty of care’ to protect others may enhance SIV intention. While improved access to SIV in the workplace could promote positive vaccination behaviour, particularly if triggers or nudges are applied to prompt the vaccination habit in the presence of SIV acceptance.
- 29 October 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 31 (15-16) , 2112-2124
Determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination hesitancy among healthcare personnel: An integrative review
Aims and objectives: To explore the determinants of and behaviour change models for seasonal influenza vaccination compliance among healthcare personnel.Background: COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel may be better understood by exploring determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy.Design: Integrative literature review.Methods: A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Six thousand and forty‐eight articles were screened. Seventy‐eight met inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of included articles, a narrative synthesis was conducted utilising a conceptual matrix to identify thematic categories.Results: Six thematic categories were identified as influencing HCP SIV compliance: ‘perceived vulnerability’, ‘trust’, ‘past behaviour’, ‘professional duty’, ‘access and convenience’ and ‘knowledge and experience’. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was the most commonly utilised health behaviour change model within the seasonal influenza vaccination context. Few studies have examined seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance and uptake within the Australian HCP context, particularly involving community care and aged care.Conclusions: Factors that appear to relate to influenza vaccination compliance among HCP can be grouped according to several thematic categories, and they also appear influential in COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. In particular, an emerging focus on ‘trust’ or the more emotive considerations of decision‐making around health‐protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic. Efforts to influence these domains to increase compliance, however, are likely to be impeded by a lack of a well‐developed and tested behaviour change model.Relevance to clinical practice: Healthcare personnel (HCP) face high levels of occupational exposure to seasonal influenza every year. An emerging focus on ‘trust’ and the more emotive considerations of decision‐making around health‐protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic.
- 29 October 2021
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 31 (15-16) , 2112-2124
Determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination hesitancy among healthcare personnel: An integrative review
Aims and objectives: To explore the determinants of and behaviour change models for seasonal influenza vaccination compliance among healthcare personnel.Background: COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel may be better understood by exploring determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy.Design: Integrative literature review.Methods: A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Six thousand and forty‐eight articles were screened. Seventy‐eight met inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of included articles, a narrative synthesis was conducted utilising a conceptual matrix to identify thematic categories.Results: Six thematic categories were identified as influencing HCP SIV compliance: ‘perceived vulnerability’, ‘trust’, ‘past behaviour’, ‘professional duty’, ‘access and convenience’ and ‘knowledge and experience’. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was the most commonly utilised health behaviour change model within the seasonal influenza vaccination context. Few studies have examined seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance and uptake within the Australian HCP context, particularly involving community care and aged care.Conclusions: Factors that appear to relate to influenza vaccination compliance among HCP can be grouped according to several thematic categories, and they also appear influential in COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. In particular, an emerging focus on ‘trust’ or the more emotive considerations of decision‐making around health‐protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic. Efforts to influence these domains to increase compliance, however, are likely to be impeded by a lack of a well‐developed and tested behaviour change model.Relevance to clinical practice: Healthcare personnel (HCP) face high levels of occupational exposure to seasonal influenza every year. An emerging focus on ‘trust’ and the more emotive considerations of decision‐making around health‐protective behaviours requires further exploration in the context of a pandemic.