Roy Helge Gabrielsen

The Caledonian Orogen was the final product of a sequence of processes initiated by extension and continental rifting, followed by translation of detached terranes across the intervening oceans, and eventual amalgamation during the final closing of the oceans and collisional orogenies. The Iapetus, Tornquist and Asgard oceans and various minor seaways developed at different times in response to rifting and dispersion of continental plates and their detached fragments and were major sites of subduction and related magmatism during sequential orogenic events. The combination of these processes led to complex assemblies of diverse lithological elements in the Appalachians, and the Scottish–Irish and Scandinavian caledonides. The interpretation and synthesis of the results from many studies on the provenance and histories of the constituent parts of these orogens over time has generated composite and complex tectonic models, which explain many of the observed features, but which are also partly compromised by problematic assumptions and interpretations. This paper summarizes evidence on the geological processes that accompanied the evolving Iapetus Ocean and the surrounding continents during these events. We focus especially on some of the most problematic assumptions in current models of the Scandinavian Caledonides, hinting at possible alternatives.

The tectonic status, the mode of Caledonian deformation and the transport distance of the Precambrian units on the Fennoscandian Shield that constitute the so-called tectonic windows within the realm of the Scandinavian Caledonian nappe pile have long been a subject of dispute. It has been argued for several hundred kilometres of eastward transport for some of these tectonic units, whereas parautochthonous to autochthonous positions have also been suggested. In this contribution, geophysical data have been studied to shed light on this controversy. A dominant regional NNW–SSE to north–south structural grain of Precambrian origin extends beneath the Caledonian nappes. Indeed, similar structural patterns appear in several of the tectonic windows within the orogen. However, magnetic anomalies in southern Norway and the Nordland area show an apparent c. 90° counterclockwise rotation into the Caledonian trend along a line from Nordfjord in western Norway to Senja in northern Norway, whereas the anomalies in Finnmark (northernmost Norway), seem to be rotated clockwise along a line from Kvænangen to Porsangerfjorden. We suggest that this pattern extending through the Caledonides likely represents a boundary between two crustal domains with different Caledonian reworking. The eastern domain demonstrates less extensive modification during the Caledonian continent–continent collision. Some thrusts within basement windows in the eastern domain accommodated transport of a few tens of kilometres, revealing a parautochthonous status for most of these windows. Interpretations of aeromagnetic and gravity data have shown that the Caledonian nappes occurring along detachments extend to a maximum depth of c. 9 km below sea-level. The thickest nappe piles occur along the late Caledonian detachments. The eastern basement domain with minor Caledonian deformation has a thinner nappe stack (up to 4–5 km below). Our combined interpretations also show the need to modify the tectonostratigraphy of the northern Scandinavian Caledonides. The Lower Laksefjord Nappe in Finnmark, for instance, is interpreted as a parautochthonous window into the Precambrian basement and is not part of the Laksefjord Nappe Complex that has been transported hundreds of kilometres.

Application of lineament analysis in structural geology gained renewed interest when remote sensing data and technology became available through dedicated Earth observation satellites like Landsat in 1972. Lineament data have since been widely used in general structural investigations and resource and geohazard studies. The present contribution argues that lineament analysis remains a useful tool in structural geology research both at the regional and local scales. However, the traditional “lineament study” is only one of several methods. It is argued here that structural and lineament remote sensing studies can be separated into four distinct strategies or approaches. The general analyzing approach includes general structural analysis and identification of foliation patterns and composite structural units (mega-units). The general approach is routinely used by most geologists in preparation for field work, and it is argued that at least parts of this should be performed manually by staff who will participate in the field activity. We argue that this approach should be a cyclic process so that the lineament database is continuously revised by the integration of data acquired by field data and supplementary data sets, like geophysical geochronological data. To ensure that general geological (field) knowledge is not neglected, it is our experience that at least a part of this type of analysis should be performed manually. The statistical approach conforms with what most geologists would regard as “lineament analysis” and is based on statistical scrutiny of the available lineament data with the aim of identifying zones of an enhanced (or subdued) lineament density. It would commonly predict the general geometric characteristics and classification of individual lineaments or groups of lineaments. Due to efficiency, capacity, consistency of interpretation methods, interpretation and statistical handling, this interpretative approach may most conveniently be performed through the use of automatized methods, namely by applying algorithms for pattern recognition and machine learning. The focused and dynamic approaches focus on specified lineaments or faults and commonly include a full structural geological analysis and data acquired from field work. It is emphasized that geophysical (potential field) data should be utilized in lineament analysis wherever available in all approaches. Furthermore, great care should be taken in the construction of the database, which should be tailored for this kind of study. The database should have a 3D or even 4D capacity and be object-oriented and designed to absorb different (and even unforeseen) data types on all scales. It should also be designed to interface with shifting modeling tools and other databases. Studies of the Norwegian mainland have utilized most of these strategies in lineament studies on different scales. It is concluded that lineament studies have revealed fracture and fault systems and the geometric relations between them, which would have remained unknown without application of remote sensing data and lineament analysis.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, and eventually contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contains several structural families of overlapping and reactivated structures. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled and stratified sand–silicon polymer sequence, was used in the study of the structural evolution of the shear margin. The most significant observations for interpreting the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are the following. Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a hybrid final structural pattern. Several structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. All master faults, pull-apart basins, and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. The fold pattern was generated during the terminal stage (contraction–inversion became dominant in the basin areas) and was characterized by fold axes striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, strongly affected the shallow intra-basin layers. The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault-and-fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. It includes one northern (Hornsund Fault Zone) and a southern (Senja Fracture Zone) margin segment in which structuring was dominated by dextral shear. These segments are separated by the Vestbakken Volcanic Province that rests in a releasing bend position between the two. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contain several structural families of over-lapping and reactivated structures Although the convolute structural pattern associated with the Barents Shear Margin has been noted, it has not yet been explained in this framework. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled stratified sand-silicon polymer sequence, serve to study the structural evolution of the shear margin in response to shear deformation along a pre-defined boundary representing the geometry of the Barents Shear Margin and variations in kinematic boundary conditions of subsequent deformation events, i.e. direction of extension and inversion. The observations that are of particular significance for interpretating the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are: 1) The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault and fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin. 2) Several of the structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. 3) Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a complex final structural pattern. 4) All master faults, pull-part basins and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. 5) The fold pattern generated during the terminal stage (contraction/inversion became dominant in the basinal areas and was characterized by fold axes with traces striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, most strongly affected the shallow intra-basinal layers. This is in general agreement with observations in previous and new reflection seismic data from the Barents Shear Margin.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. It includes one northern (Hornsund Fault Zone) and a southern (Senja Fracture Zone) margin segment in which structuring was dominated by dextral shear. These segments are separated by the Vestbakken Volcanic Province that rests in a releasing bend position between the two. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contain several structural families of over-lapping and reactivated structures Although the convolute structural pattern associated with the Barents Shear Margin has been noted, it has not yet been explained in this framework. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled stratified sand-silicon polymer sequence, serve to study the structural evolution of the shear margin in response to shear deformation along a pre-defined boundary representing the geometry of the Barents Shear Margin and variations in kinematic boundary conditions of subsequent deformation events, i.e. direction of extension and inversion. The observations that are of particular significance for interpretating the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are: 1) The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault and fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin. 2) Several of the structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. 3) Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a complex final structural pattern. 4) All master faults, pull-part basins and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. 5) The fold pattern generated during the terminal stage (contraction/inversion became dominant in the basinal areas and was characterized by fold axes with traces striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, most strongly affected the shallow intra-basinal layers. This is in general agreement with observations in previous and new reflection seismic data from the Barents Shear Margin.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. It includes one northern (Hornsund Fault Zone) and a southern (Senja Fracture Zone) margin segment in which structuring was dominated by dextral shear. These segments are separated by the Vestbakken Volcanic Province that rests in a releasing bend position between the two. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contain several structural families of over-lapping and reactivated structures Although the convolute structural pattern associated with the Barents Shear Margin has been noted, it has not yet been explained in this framework. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled stratified sand-silicon polymer sequence, serve to study the structural evolution of the shear margin in response to shear deformation along a pre-defined boundary representing the geometry of the Barents Shear Margin and variations in kinematic boundary conditions of subsequent deformation events, i.e. direction of extension and inversion. The observations that are of particular significance for interpretating the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are: 1) The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault and fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin. 2) Several of the structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. 3) Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a complex final structural pattern. 4) All master faults, pull-part basins and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. 5) The fold pattern generated during the terminal stage (contraction/inversion became dominant in the basinal areas and was characterized by fold axes with traces striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, most strongly affected the shallow intra-basinal layers. This is in general agreement with observations in previous and new reflection seismic data from the Barents Shear Margin.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. It includes one northern (Hornsund Fault Zone) and a southern (Senja Fracture Zone) margin segment in which structuring was dominated by dextral shear. These segments are separated by the Vestbakken Volcanic Province that rests in a releasing bend position between the two. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contain several structural families of over-lapping and reactivated structures Although the convolute structural pattern associated with the Barents Shear Margin has been noted, it has not yet been explained in this framework. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled stratified sand-silicon polymer sequence, serve to study the structural evolution of the shear margin in response to shear deformation along a pre-defined boundary representing the geometry of the Barents Shear Margin and variations in kinematic boundary conditions of subsequent deformation events, i.e. direction of extension and inversion. The observations that are of particular significance for interpretating the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are: 1) The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault and fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin. 2) Several of the structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. 3) Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a complex final structural pattern. 4) All master faults, pull-part basins and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. 5) The fold pattern generated during the terminal stage (contraction/inversion became dominant in the basinal areas and was characterized by fold axes with traces striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, most strongly affected the shallow intra-basinal layers. This is in general agreement with observations in previous and new reflection seismic data from the Barents Shear Margin.

The Barents Shear Margin separates the Svalbard and Barents Sea from the North Atlantic. It includes one northern (Hornsund Fault Zone) and a southern (Senja Fracture Zone) margin segment in which structuring was dominated by dextral shear. These segments are separated by the Vestbakken Volcanic Province that rests in a releasing bend position between the two. During the break-up of the North Atlantic the plate tectonic configuration was characterized by sequential dextral shear, extension, contraction and inversion. This generated a complex zone of deformation that contain several structural families of over-lapping and reactivated structures Although the convolute structural pattern associated with the Barents Shear Margin has been noted, it has not yet been explained in this framework. A series of crustal-scale analogue experiments, utilizing a scaled stratified sand-silicon polymer sequence, serve to study the structural evolution of the shear margin in response to shear deformation along a pre-defined boundary representing the geometry of the Barents Shear Margin and variations in kinematic boundary conditions of subsequent deformation events, i.e. direction of extension and inversion. The observations that are of particular significance for interpretating the structural configuration of the Barents Shear Margin are: 1) The experiments reproduced the geometry and positions of the major basins and relations between structural elements (fault and fold systems) as observed along and adjacent to the Barents Shear Margin. This supports the present structural model for the shear margin. 2) Several of the structural features that were initiated during the early (dextral shear) stage became overprinted and obliterated in the subsequent stages. 3) Prominent early-stage positive structural elements (e.g. folds, push-ups) interacted with younger (e.g. inversion) structures and contributed to a complex final structural pattern. 4) All master faults, pull-part basins and extensional shear duplexes initiated during the shear stage quickly became linked in the extension stage, generating a connected basin system along the entire shear margin at the stage of maximum extension. 5) The fold pattern generated during the terminal stage (contraction/inversion became dominant in the basinal areas and was characterized by fold axes with traces striking parallel to the basin margins. These folds, however, most strongly affected the shallow intra-basinal layers. This is in general agreement with observations in previous and new reflection seismic data from the Barents Shear Margin.