Thomas J. Avenson
Research Subjects
Thomas J. Avenson has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haidong Zhao
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, USA
2 shared publications - Xiaomao Lin
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA
2 shared publications - Amanda J. Ashworth
USDA ARS Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit Fayetteville Arkansas USA
1 shared publication - Anirban Guha
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram (IISER TVM)
1 shared publication - Christopher Vincent
Horticultural Science Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850. USA
1 shared publication - Dianfeng Zheng
College of Agriculture, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 August 2024
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 10 (31) , eado6864
An unprecedented fall drought drives Dust Bowl–like losses associated with La Niña events in US wheat production
Unprecedented precipitation deficits in the 2022–2023 growing season across the primary wheat-producing region in the United States caused delays in winter wheat emergence and poor crop growth. Using an integrated approach, we quantitatively unraveled a 37% reduction in wheat production as being attributable to both per–harvested acre yield loss and severe crop abandonment, reminiscent of the Dust Bowl years in the 1930s. We used random forest machine learning and game theory analytics to show that the main driver of yield loss was spring drought, whereas fall drought dominated abandonment rates. Furthermore, results revealed, across the US winter wheat belt, the La Niña phase of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), increased abandonment rates compared to the El Niño phase. These findings underscore the necessity of simultaneously addressing crop abandonment and yield decline to stabilize wheat production amid extreme climatic conditions and provide a holistic understanding of global-scale ENSO dynamics on wheat production.
- 2 August 2024
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 10 (31) , eado6864
Open AccessAn unprecedented fall drought drives Dust Bowl–like losses associated with La Niña events in US wheat production
Unprecedented precipitation deficits in the 2022–2023 growing season across the primary wheat-producing region in the United States caused delays in winter wheat emergence and poor crop growth. Using an integrated approach, we quantitatively unraveled a 37% reduction in wheat production as being attributable to both per–harvested acre yield loss and severe crop abandonment, reminiscent of the Dust Bowl years in the 1930s. We used random forest machine learning and game theory analytics to show that the main driver of yield loss was spring drought, whereas fall drought dominated abandonment rates. Furthermore, results revealed, across the US winter wheat belt, the La Niña phase of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), increased abandonment rates compared to the El Niño phase. These findings underscore the necessity of simultaneously addressing crop abandonment and yield decline to stabilize wheat production amid extreme climatic conditions and provide a holistic understanding of global-scale ENSO dynamics on wheat production.
- Open Access
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Wiley in Plant-Environment Interactions
- Vol. 3 (2) , 41-59
Fresh perspectives on an established technique: Pulsed amplitude modulation chlorophyll a fluorescence
Pulsed amplitude modulation (PAM) chlorophyll a fluorescence provides information about photosynthetic energy transduction. When reliably measured, chlorophyll a fluorescence provides detailed information about critical in vivo photosynthetic processes. Such information has recently provided novel and critical insights into how the yield potential of crops can be improved and it is being used to understand remotely sensed fluorescence, which is termed solar‐induced fluorescence and will be solely measured by a satellite scheduled to be launched this year. While PAM chlorophyll a fluorometers measure fluorescence intensity per se, herein we articulate the axiomatic criteria by which instrumentally detected intensities can be assumed to assess fluorescence yield, a phenomenon quite different than fluorescence intensity and one that provides critical insight about how solar energy is variably partitioned into the biosphere. An integrated mathematical, phenomenological, and practical discussion of many useful chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters is presented. We draw attention to, and provide examples of, potential uncertainties that can result from incorrect methodological practices and potentially problematic instrumental design features. Fundamentals of fluorescence measurements are discussed, including the major assumptions underlying the signals and the methodological caveats about taking measurements during both dark‐ and light‐adapted conditions. Key fluorescence parameters are discussed in the context of recent applications under environmental stress. Nuanced information that can be gleaned from intra‐comparisons of fluorescence‐derived parameters and intercomparisons of fluorescence‐derived parameters with those based on other techniques is elucidated.
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Wiley in Plant-Environment Interactions
- Vol. 3 (2) , 41-59
Open AccessFresh perspectives on an established technique: Pulsed amplitude modulation chlorophyll a fluorescence
Pulsed amplitude modulation (PAM) chlorophyll a fluorescence provides information about photosynthetic energy transduction. When reliably measured, chlorophyll a fluorescence provides detailed information about critical in vivo photosynthetic processes. Such information has recently provided novel and critical insights into how the yield potential of crops can be improved and it is being used to understand remotely sensed fluorescence, which is termed solar‐induced fluorescence and will be solely measured by a satellite scheduled to be launched this year. While PAM chlorophyll a fluorometers measure fluorescence intensity per se, herein we articulate the axiomatic criteria by which instrumentally detected intensities can be assumed to assess fluorescence yield, a phenomenon quite different than fluorescence intensity and one that provides critical insight about how solar energy is variably partitioned into the biosphere. An integrated mathematical, phenomenological, and practical discussion of many useful chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters is presented. We draw attention to, and provide examples of, potential uncertainties that can result from incorrect methodological practices and potentially problematic instrumental design features. Fundamentals of fluorescence measurements are discussed, including the major assumptions underlying the signals and the methodological caveats about taking measurements during both dark‐ and light‐adapted conditions. Key fluorescence parameters are discussed in the context of recent applications under environmental stress. Nuanced information that can be gleaned from intra‐comparisons of fluorescence‐derived parameters and intercomparisons of fluorescence‐derived parameters with those based on other techniques is elucidated.
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Wiley in Plant, Cell & Environment
- Vol. 45 (1) , 105-120
Short‐term warming does not affect intrinsic thermotolerance but induces strong sustaining photoprotection in tropical evergreen citrus genotypes
Consequences of warming and postwarming events on photosynthetic thermotolerance (PT) and photoprotective responses in tropical evergreen species remain elusive. We chose Citrus to answer some of the emerging questions related to tropical evergreen species' PT behaviour including (i) how wide is the genotypic variation in PT? (ii) how does PT respond to short‐term warming and (iii) how do photosynthesis and photoprotective functions respond over short‐term warming and postwarming events? A study on 21 genotypes revealed significant genotypic differences in PT, though these were not large. We selected five genotypes with divergent PT and simulated warming events: Tmax 26/20°C (day‐time highest maximum/night‐time lowest maximum) (Week 1) < Tmax 33/30°C (Week 2) < Tmax 36/32°C (Week 3) followed by Tmax 26/16°C (Week 4, recovery). The PT of all genotypes remained unaltered despite strong leaf megathermy (leaf temperature > air temperature) during warming events. Though moderate warming showed genotype‐specific stimulation in photosynthesis, higher warming unequivocally led to severe loss in net photosynthesis and induced higher nonphotochemical quenching. Even after a week of postwarming, photoprotective mechanisms strongly persisted. Our study points towards a conservative PT in evergreen citrus genotypes and their need for sustaining higher photoprotection during warming as well as postwarming recovery conditions.
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Wiley in Plant, Cell & Environment
- Vol. 45 (1) , 105-120
Short‐term warming does not affect intrinsic thermotolerance but induces strong sustaining photoprotection in tropical evergreen citrus genotypes
Consequences of warming and postwarming events on photosynthetic thermotolerance (PT) and photoprotective responses in tropical evergreen species remain elusive. We chose Citrus to answer some of the emerging questions related to tropical evergreen species' PT behaviour including (i) how wide is the genotypic variation in PT? (ii) how does PT respond to short‐term warming and (iii) how do photosynthesis and photoprotective functions respond over short‐term warming and postwarming events? A study on 21 genotypes revealed significant genotypic differences in PT, though these were not large. We selected five genotypes with divergent PT and simulated warming events: Tmax 26/20°C (day‐time highest maximum/night‐time lowest maximum) (Week 1) < Tmax 33/30°C (Week 2) < Tmax 36/32°C (Week 3) followed by Tmax 26/16°C (Week 4, recovery). The PT of all genotypes remained unaltered despite strong leaf megathermy (leaf temperature > air temperature) during warming events. Though moderate warming showed genotype‐specific stimulation in photosynthesis, higher warming unequivocally led to severe loss in net photosynthesis and induced higher nonphotochemical quenching. Even after a week of postwarming, photoprotective mechanisms strongly persisted. Our study points towards a conservative PT in evergreen citrus genotypes and their need for sustaining higher photoprotection during warming as well as postwarming recovery conditions.