Xiaojun Guo
Xiaojun Guo has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chaohui Lin
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Marine Energy Equipment, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China
2 shared publications Fuxiang Liu
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publicationHebin Wu
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Marine Energy Equipment, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publication- Hebin Wu
State Key Laboratory of Precision Electronic Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
1 shared publication - Jianxin Liu
AECC Hunan Aviation Powerplant Research Institute, Zhuzhou 412002, China
1 shared publication Jingling Zeng
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 2 May 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
- Vol. 33 (7) , 3299-3308
Evaluation of Laser Shock Processing Quality of a Superalloy Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology
- 2 May 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
- Vol. 33 (7) , 3299-3308
Evaluation of Laser Shock Processing Quality of a Superalloy Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology
- Open Access
Experimental Study on FGH95 Superalloy Turbine Disk Joint Material by Oblique Laser Shock Processing
The FGH95 superalloy used for turbine disk manufacturing was strengthened by the oblique laser shock processing (OLSP). The laser energy, beam diameter, and number of impacts were selected as the test factors, and the three-factor three-level oblique laser shock processing orthogonal test was carried out. Based on the analysis of variance and range of the surface residual stress, microhardness, roughness, tensile strength, and yield strength of FGH95 superalloy after LSP, the factor level combination of relative best comprehensive performance was obtained. The results showed that, within the 10% confidence level, the order of influencing factors with significant difference is: laser energy > number of impacts > beam diameter. Compared with the unimpacted sample, the microhardness of the material surface was increased by about 25% after OLSP. With the increase of laser energy, the dimple distribution of the sample was more uniform, smaller in size, and shallower in depth. However, the thickness of the affected layer was very low, and there was no significant effect on the tensile properties. In general, and under the test conditions selected in this study, the combination of 8 Joule laser energy, 3 mm beam diameter, and three impacts can be selected to obtain the best comprehensive performance. The results of this paper provide a reference for the OLSP of the FGH95 superalloy turbine disk and other aero engine parts.
Open AccessExperimental Study on FGH95 Superalloy Turbine Disk Joint Material by Oblique Laser Shock Processing
The FGH95 superalloy used for turbine disk manufacturing was strengthened by the oblique laser shock processing (OLSP). The laser energy, beam diameter, and number of impacts were selected as the test factors, and the three-factor three-level oblique laser shock processing orthogonal test was carried out. Based on the analysis of variance and range of the surface residual stress, microhardness, roughness, tensile strength, and yield strength of FGH95 superalloy after LSP, the factor level combination of relative best comprehensive performance was obtained. The results showed that, within the 10% confidence level, the order of influencing factors with significant difference is: laser energy > number of impacts > beam diameter. Compared with the unimpacted sample, the microhardness of the material surface was increased by about 25% after OLSP. With the increase of laser energy, the dimple distribution of the sample was more uniform, smaller in size, and shallower in depth. However, the thickness of the affected layer was very low, and there was no significant effect on the tensile properties. In general, and under the test conditions selected in this study, the combination of 8 Joule laser energy, 3 mm beam diameter, and three impacts can be selected to obtain the best comprehensive performance. The results of this paper provide a reference for the OLSP of the FGH95 superalloy turbine disk and other aero engine parts.