NSNina Seidenberg

Nina Seidenberg

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Nina Seidenberg has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Learning At and From a Virtual Conference

    by Nina Seidenberg, Ioana Jivet, Maren Scheffel, Vitomir Kovanović, Grace Lynch, Hendrik Drachsler

    A relevant learning space for academics, especially junior researchers, is the academic conference. While conference participation has long been associated with personal attendance at the conference venue, virtual participation is becoming increasingly important. This study investigates the perceived value of a purely virtual academic conference for its participants by analyzing the evaluation feedback (N = 759) from three virtual and two face-to-face LAK conferences. For the purposes of this study, we derive a definition of conference value and identify factors contributing to the overall value rating of virtual academic conferences based on the existing literature. Results indicate a perceived value of virtual conferences comparable with that of face-to-face events, satisfaction with social interaction and topics of interest being the most important predictors. Our insights show that virtual conferences are valuable events for academic professional development and conference organizers can utilize these results to design a valuable event for their participants.


  • Open Access

    Virtual academic conferences as learning spaces: Factors associated with the perceived value of purely virtual conferences

    by Nina Seidenberg, Maren Scheffel, Vitomir Kovanovic, Grace Lynch, Hendrik Drachsler

    Background: The COVID‐19 outbreak came with an unprecedented opportunity to investigate how the new reality of social distancing and limited international travel will affect the organization of academic conferences.Objectives: Drawing on conceptualization of academic conferences as professional learning spaces, in this study, we examine the factors associated with the perceived value of purely virtual academic conferences and how such perceptions differ between participants from different research fields. The aim was to gain knowledge about factors that should be considered when designing a virtual conference.Methods: Survey data from participants of three different virtual conferences were collected (N = 311). Kendall's rank correlation and χ2‐analyses were performed.Results and Conclusion: Results show satisfaction with social interaction, the extent to which presentations met participants' topics of interest and the perceived importance of learning and getting an overview on the research topic to be related to the value rating. Researchers from different research fields differ significantly in their opinion about the most appropriate conference format regarding getting an overview on the research topic. For some researchers, virtual participation might be a valuable alternative to attending a conference in person. The study serves as a first attempt to understand how and for which target groups virtual conferences serve as a valuable learning event. Further research on this conference format is needed.