Lining Zhao

Lining Zhao

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Lining Zhao has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Ashok Biswas

    Annual Bast Fiber Breeding Lab., Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, 410205, China

    1 shared publication
  • Cuiping Zhang

    Research Team of Genetic Modification of Annual Bast Fiber Crops, Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China

    1 shared publication
  • Defang Li

    Research Team of Genetic Modification of Annual Bast Fiber Crops, Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China

    1 shared publication
  • Dengxiang Du

    National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

    1 shared publication
  • Huijuan Tang

    Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China

    1 shared publication
  • Jiangjiang Zhang

    Annual Bast Fiber Breeding Laboratory, Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Key Cannabis Salt-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Varieties

    by Jiangjiang Zhang, Cuiping Zhang, Siqi Huang, Li Chang, Jianjun Li, Huijuan Tang, Susmita Dey, Ashok Biswas, Dengxiang Du, Defang Li, et al.

    For the dissection and identification of the molecular response mechanisms to salt stress in cannabis, an experiment was conducted surveying the diversity of physiological characteristics. RNA-seq profiling was carried out to identify differential expression genes and pathway which respond to salt stress in different cannabis materials. The result of physiological diversity analyses showed that it is more sensitive to proline contents in K94 than in W20; 6 h was needed to reach the maximum in K94, compared to 12 h in W20. For profiling 0–72 h after treatment, a total of 10,149 differentially expressed genes were identified, and 249 genes exhibited significantly diverse expression levels in K94, which were clustered in plant hormone signal transduction and the MAPK signaling pathway. A total of 371 genes showed significant diversity expression variations in W20, which were clustered in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and plant hormone signal transduction pathway. The pathway enrichment by genes which were identified in K94 and W20 showed a similar trend to those clustered in plant hormone signal transduction pathways and MAPK signaling. Otherwise, there were 85 genes which identified overlaps between the two materials, indicating that these may be underlying genes related to salt stress in cannabis. The 86.67% agreement of the RNA-seq and qRT-PCR indicated the accuracy and reliability of the RNA-seq technique. Additionally, the result of physiological diversity was consistent with the predicted RNA-seq-based findings. This research may offer new insights into the molecular networks mediating cannabis to respond to salt stress.