SNSima Nikooee

Sima Nikooee

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sima Nikooee has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Establishing research impact assessment in Iran: The first report from a non-high-income country

    by Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Ayat Ahmadi, Farid Najafi, Kazem Mohammad, Mohammad Fariden, Davood Khalili, Mahdi Mahdavi, Elaheh Rahimpour, Abolghasem Jouyban, Roya Kelishadi, et al.

    The significance of establishing and strengthening a national research system to meet the demands of a health system was emphasised at the 2008 Global Ministerial Meeting on Research for Health, held in Bamako, Mali [1]. In recent years, the role of research evidence in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the […]


  • Open Access

    Developing Framework and Strategies for Capacity Building to Apply Evidence-Informed Health Policy-Making in Iran: Mixed Methods Study of SAHSHA Project

    by Mahdi Mahdavi, Javad Sajjadi Khasraghi, Haniye Sadat Sajadi, Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Sima Nikooee, Elham Ehsani-Chimeh, Hossein Dargahi, Leila Doshmangir, Shahram Ghaffari, Reza Toyserkanmanesh, et al.

    Background: SASHA, which stands for "evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP)" in Persian, is a national project to draw a roadmap for strengthening EIHP in Iran. As a part of SASHA, this research aimed to develop evidence-based and context-aware policy options for increasing the capacity of decision-makers to apply EIHP in Iran. Methods: This was a qualitative study, which was informed by a literature review of pull efforts’ capacity building programs. Based on the review, we developed policy options and validated them through an expert panel that involved twelve experts. Data were analyzed using a content analysis method. Results: We extracted data from 11 articles. The objectives of capacity building programs were: single-skill development, personal/professional development, and organizational development. According to these objectives, the contents and training methods of the programs vary. Capacity building programs have shown positive impacts on individual knowledge/attitudes to use EIHP. However, the impacts of programs at the organizational or the health system level remain under-researched. We followed several threads from the literature review through to the expert panel that included training the management team, instead of training managers, training for problem-solving skills, and designing tailored programs. Barriers of capacity building for EIHP regard the context of the health system (weak accountability and the widespread conflict of interest) and healthcare organizational structures (decision support systems, knowledge management infrastructures, and lack of management team). Experts suggested interventions on the barriers, particularly on resolving the conflict of interests before launching new programs. A proposed framework to increase the capacity of health policy-makers incorporates strategies at three levels: capacity building program, organizational structure, and health system context. Conclusion: To prepare the context of Iranian healthcare organizations for capacity building programs, the conflict of interests needs to be resolved, decision-makers should be made more accountable, and healthcare organizations need to provide more knowledge management infrastructures and decision support systems.