S. K. Tahajjul Taufique

Circadian rhythms are ubiquitous, and most of the organs in the body contain circadian oscillators. The intestine comprises diverse cell types with distinct developmental origins and physiological functions. However, which intestinal cells contain cell-autonomous circadian oscillators and how circadian oscillators in distinct intestinal cell types synchronize with one another and with environmental daily cycles remain poorly understood. To address these questions, we generated a Cre-dependent PER2::LUCIFERASE reporter knock-in mouse that enables ex vivo measurement of circadian oscillations in defined cell populations. Ex vivo gut explants from mice expressing the reporter in one of five major cell types of the muscularis externa—enteric neurons (ENs), enteric glial cells (EGCs), interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and muscularis macrophages (MMs)—exhibited robust, self-sustained circadian bioluminescence rhythms, demonstrating that each of these cell types harbors a cell-autonomous circadian oscillator. Importantly, circadian oscillators in ENs, EGCs, SMCs, and MMs entrained to feeding-fasting cycles, whereas circadian oscillators in ICCs remained resistant to food entrainment. These findings reveal that distinct intestinal cell types possess unique entrainment properties, and feeding during inactive time induces heterogeneous phase shifts across gut circadian oscillators, leading to temporal circadian misalignment within the intestine. As circadian disruptions, such as those associated with shift work, contribute to intestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease and disorders of the gut–brain interaction, studying how intercellular circadian desynchrony influences intestinal homeostasis should provide chronobiology-based therapeutic strategies to combat these diseases.

When nocturnal rodents are subjected to daytime restricted feeding, in which food is only available for a few hours per day, they typically become active a few hours before the onset of the scheduled mealtime. This so-called food-anticipatory activity (FAA) is controlled by an autonomous circadian pacemaker, which is independent from the central circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Fred Stephan named this pacemaker the food-entrainable oscillator (FEO) because FAA re-entrains to a shifted feeding schedule. We recently developed a method to measure food-seeking nose-poking behavior by an operant feeding device and found that anticipatory food-seeking nose-poking for scheduled daily food availability shifts in parallel with phase-shifted environmental light-dark cycles, raising the possibility that anticipatory food-seeking behavior is controlled by an oscillator entrained to the environmental light-dark cycle. With this possible light-entrainability of the FEO, we revisited Stephan’s historical experiment—testing whether the FEO entrains to feeding cycle in the absence of a light-dark cycle without functional SCN—using Period 1/2/3 triple knockout (KO) mice, in which the canonical circadian oscillators in the SCN and peripheral tissues are disabled. KO mice were subjected to restricted feeding under constant darkness. The food-seeking nose-poking activity of a subset of the KO mice indeed occasionally entrained to the feeding cycle and re-entrained to a shifted feeding cycle. Despite our previous study showing that anticipatory food-seeking behavior shifted with the environmental light-dark cycle, these data demonstrate that it can also entrain to the feeding cycle in the absence of an environmental light-dark cycle, supporting Stephan’s observation that the FEO is indeed food-entrainable.

Anticipatory activity for daily chocolate chip access is stronger than that for daily peanut butter access. Mice given daily chocolate chip access, but not peanut butter access, exhibited altered circadian organization among peripheral clocks. During food deprivation, mice exhibited anticipatory food-seeking behavior at the time they had previously been given chocolate chip access, suggesting that the time of palatable meals is encoded in the circadian pacemaker controlling food-anticipatory activity.

Using an open-source operant feeding device (FED3), we measured food-seeking nose poking behavior in mice. When the mice were exposed to 4 h restricted feeding at night, all mice exhibited robust food anticipatory nose poking starting ~4 h before scheduled mealtime. When the light-dark cycle was advanced by 6 h, mice exhibited two distinct bouts of anticipatory poking, one corresponding to actual mealtime which continued at the same time of day, and one corresponding to predicted mealtime which shifted parallel with the light-dark cycle. Likewise, two similar bouts of food-seeking behavior appeared when the light-dark cycle was delayed for 9 h. These data suggest that food anticipatory behavior is encoded to a circadian oscillator that entrains to the light-dark cycle. Two weeks after advancing the light-dark cycle, mice incidentally received a 3.5 h dark pulse in the middle of the day. This single dark pulse had a negligible effect on running wheel behavior but caused a temporary attenuation of both food anticipatory poking and pellet intake. These results suggest that the circadian oscillator controlling food anticipatory poking is sensitive to light disruption and that proper food anticipation is critical for sufficient food intake during temporally restricted feeding.

We assessed the circadian clock control of singing and reproductive performance in zebra finches. Experiment 1 examined changes in body mass, testis size, and plasma corticosterone and testosterone levels in male birds exposed to constant light (LL, 100 lx) and constant darkness (DD, 0.5 lx), with controls on 12L:12D (L = 100 lx, D = 0.5 lx). There was a significant increase in the body mass and testis size under LL and a decrease in testis size under the DD. Using a similar design, experiment 2 assessed the persistence of the circadian rhythm in singing along with activity–rest pattern in cohort I birds that were entrained to 12L:12D and subsequently released in DD or LL, and in cohort II birds that were entrained to 12L:12D and following pinealectomy were released in DD. Both activity and singing patterns were synchronized with the light phase under 12L:12D, free-ran with a circadian period under DD, and were arrhythmic under the LL. There was an overall decreased and increased effect on singing under DD and LL, respectively, albeit with differences in various song parameters. The pinealectomy disrupted both activity and singing rhythms but did not affect singing or the overall song features. Pinealectomized bird pairs also exhibited a significant reduction in their nest-building and breeding efforts, resulting in a compromised reproductive performance. These results suggest a circadian clock control of singing and more importantly demonstrate a role of the pineal clock in breeding behaviors, leading to a compromised reproductive performance in diurnal zebra finches. Graphical abstract

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) underlies diverse biological processes. Because most LLPS studies were performed in vitro using recombinant proteins or in cells that overexpress protein, the physiological relevance of LLPS for endogenous protein is often unclear. PERIOD, the intrinsically disordered domain-rich proteins, are central mammalian circadian clock components and interact with other clock proteins in the core circadian negative feedback loop. Different core clock proteins were previously shown to form large complexes. Circadian clock studies often rely on experiments that overexpress clock proteins. Here, we show that when Per2 transgene was stably expressed in cells, PER2 protein formed nuclear phosphorylation-dependent slow-moving LLPS condensates that recruited other clock proteins. Super-resolution microscopy of endogenous PER2, however, revealed formation of circadian-controlled, rapidly diffusing nuclear microbodies that were resistant to protein concentration changes, hexanediol treatment, and loss of phosphorylation, indicating that they are distinct from the LLPS condensates caused by protein overexpression. Surprisingly, only a small fraction of endogenous PER2 microbodies transiently interact with endogenous BMAL1 and CRY1, a conclusion that was confirmed in cells and in mice tissues, suggesting an enzyme-like mechanism in the circadian negative feedback process. Together, these results demonstrate that the dynamic interactions of core clock proteins are a key feature of mammalian circadian clock mechanism and the importance of examining endogenous proteins in LLPS and circadian clock studies.

The last 50 years have witnessed extraordinary discoveries in the field of circadian rhythms. However, there are still several mysteries that remain. One of these chronobiological mysteries is the circadian rhythm that is revealed by administration of stimulant drugs to rodents. Herein we describe the discovery of this circadian rhythm and its underlying oscillator, which is frequently called the methamphetamine-sensitive circadian oscillator, or MASCO. This oscillator is distinct from canonical circadian oscillators because it controls robust activity rhythms independently of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and circadian genes are not essential for its timekeeping. We discuss these fundamental properties of MASCO and integrate studies of strain, sex, and circadian gene mutations on MASCO. The anatomical loci of MASCO are not known, so it has not been possible thus far to discover its novel molecular timekeeping mechanism or its functional significance. However, studies in mutant mice suggest that genetic approaches can be used to identify the neural network involved in the rhythm generation of MASCO. We also discuss parallels between human and rodent studies that support our working hypothesis that a function of MASCO may be to regulate sleep-wake cycles.

In recent times, there has been an unprecedented increase in usage of electrical lightning. This has led to increase in artificial light at night (ALAN), and it has been suggested as a source of environmental pollution. ALAN exposure has been reported to be associated with disruption of daily rhythms and serious health consequences, such as immune, metabolic, and cognitive dysfunctions in both birds and mammals. Given the worldwide pervasiveness of ALAN, this research topic is also important from an ecological perspective. In birds, daily timings and appropriate temporal niches are important for fitness and survival. Daily rhythms in a wide array of functions are regulated by the circadian clock(s) and endogenous oscillators present in the body. There is accumulating evidence that exposure to ALAN disrupts clock-regulated daily rhythms and suppresses melatonin and sleep in birds. Circadian clock, melatonin, and sleep regulate avian cognitive performance. However, there is limited research on this topic, and most of the insights on the adverse effects of ALAN on cognitive functions are from behavioural studies. Nevertheless, these results raise an intriguing question about the molecular underpinning of the ALAN-induced negative consequences on brain functions. Further research should be focused on the molecular links between ALAN and cognitive performance, including the role of melatonin, which could shed light on the mechanism by which ALAN exposures lead to negative consequences.