Chen Jiang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Chen Jiang has a total of 91 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Minggui Pan
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
16 shared publications - Aleyda V. Solorzano
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
15 shared publications - Amanda Siy
Sarcoma Program, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
15 shared publications - Elaine Chung
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
15 shared publications - Jeffrey Bien
Sarcoma Program, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
15 shared publications - Kristen N. Ganjoo
Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
15 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal Of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
- Vol. 13 (8) , 100635
Can we identify people with Alzheimer’s disease from examination of the eye? A bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study
- 10 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal Of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
- Vol. 13 (8) , 100635
Open AccessCan we identify people with Alzheimer’s disease from examination of the eye? A bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study
- Open Access
Genome-wide discovery reveals 30 loci for choroidal thickness and uncovers potential causal links with angle-closure glaucoma
The choroid is critical for maintaining vision and implicated in several ocular diseases, being the sole source of nutrients and waste removal for the outer retina. Genetic discovery can help elucidate the pathways through which choroidal features influence disease risk. Our meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (n= 78,682 participants) identified 30 genomic regions, including 20 novel loci, associated with choroidal thickness. Findings suggest inflammatory and vascular processes drive choroidal thickness, with overlapping mechanisms shared with refractive error. Genome-wide independently significant SNPs accounted for 18.7% of the genetic variance in choroidal thickness. Mendelian randomisation analyses showed a causal effect of age-related macular degeneration on choroidal thickness, and suggest a bidirectional causal effect between choroidal thickness and primary angle-closure glaucoma. These findings provide insight into the shared genetic architecture and biological pathways linking choroidal thickness and related diseases.
Open AccessGenome-wide discovery reveals 30 loci for choroidal thickness and uncovers potential causal links with angle-closure glaucoma
The choroid is critical for maintaining vision and implicated in several ocular diseases, being the sole source of nutrients and waste removal for the outer retina. Genetic discovery can help elucidate the pathways through which choroidal features influence disease risk. Our meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (n= 78,682 participants) identified 30 genomic regions, including 20 novel loci, associated with choroidal thickness. Findings suggest inflammatory and vascular processes drive choroidal thickness, with overlapping mechanisms shared with refractive error. Genome-wide independently significant SNPs accounted for 18.7% of the genetic variance in choroidal thickness. Mendelian randomisation analyses showed a causal effect of age-related macular degeneration on choroidal thickness, and suggest a bidirectional causal effect between choroidal thickness and primary angle-closure glaucoma. These findings provide insight into the shared genetic architecture and biological pathways linking choroidal thickness and related diseases.
- Open Access
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 105 (2) , e213855
Statin Initiation and Dementia Incidence in a Large Health Care System From 1997 to 2020
Previous research of associations between statins and Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (AD/ADRDs) has been limited by short follow-up, small samples, and confounding. We aimed to estimate the association between the 1st statin prescription and incident AD/ADRD among members of a large population-based cohort of older adults. We used a cohort study design emulating a target trial using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care delivery system. Participants were born before 1951 and KPNC members for 4+ years during 1997-2010. Embedded subsamples included sociodemographic and genetic data. Statin initiators were matched at first prescription ("baseline") with up to 5 "noninitiators" based on age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Participants with extreme propensity scores were excluded. The outcome was time to incident AD/ADRD diagnosis, censoring, or the administrative end of study (December 31, 2020). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for statin initiation on AD/ADRD incidence. Follow-up time was divided at the first year of follow-up to account for increased AD/ADRD detection in the first year due to increased interaction with the health care system after a statin prescription. Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 ("initiators"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). The average follow-up was 11.8 years. In the first year after initiating statins, AD/ADRD diagnoses were elevated by 46% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.53) compared with noninitiators. After 1 year, statin initiators experienced no difference in AD/ADRD incidence (full sample: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; subsample with survey covariates: HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06; subsample with survey and genetic covariates: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.07). Adjustment for sociodemographic covariates and apolipoprotein E e4 allele count did not materially change the findings. In this large emulated target trial, statin initiation was inconsistent with more than a 3% increase or decrease in the hazard of AD/ADRD after the first year of follow-up. This intent-to-treat analysis does not directly quantify effects of long-term exposure to statins. Associations in the first year likely reflect increased medical observation immediately after statin initiation. This emulated trial provides Class II evidence that statin initiation is not associated with AD/ADRD or AD incidence after the first year of follow-up.
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 105 (2) , e213855
Open AccessStatin Initiation and Dementia Incidence in a Large Health Care System From 1997 to 2020
Previous research of associations between statins and Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (AD/ADRDs) has been limited by short follow-up, small samples, and confounding. We aimed to estimate the association between the 1st statin prescription and incident AD/ADRD among members of a large population-based cohort of older adults. We used a cohort study design emulating a target trial using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care delivery system. Participants were born before 1951 and KPNC members for 4+ years during 1997-2010. Embedded subsamples included sociodemographic and genetic data. Statin initiators were matched at first prescription ("baseline") with up to 5 "noninitiators" based on age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Participants with extreme propensity scores were excluded. The outcome was time to incident AD/ADRD diagnosis, censoring, or the administrative end of study (December 31, 2020). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for statin initiation on AD/ADRD incidence. Follow-up time was divided at the first year of follow-up to account for increased AD/ADRD detection in the first year due to increased interaction with the health care system after a statin prescription. Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 ("initiators"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). The average follow-up was 11.8 years. In the first year after initiating statins, AD/ADRD diagnoses were elevated by 46% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.53) compared with noninitiators. After 1 year, statin initiators experienced no difference in AD/ADRD incidence (full sample: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; subsample with survey covariates: HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06; subsample with survey and genetic covariates: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.07). Adjustment for sociodemographic covariates and apolipoprotein E e4 allele count did not materially change the findings. In this large emulated target trial, statin initiation was inconsistent with more than a 3% increase or decrease in the hazard of AD/ADRD after the first year of follow-up. This intent-to-treat analysis does not directly quantify effects of long-term exposure to statins. Associations in the first year likely reflect increased medical observation immediately after statin initiation. This emulated trial provides Class II evidence that statin initiation is not associated with AD/ADRD or AD incidence after the first year of follow-up.
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut TP53.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut TP53.
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S3 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients wt and mut Rb1.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S3 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients wt and mut Rb1.
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S5 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut ATRX.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S5 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut ATRX.
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S4 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut PTEN.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S4 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients with wt and mut PTEN.
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
OS comparison between Stanford and KPNC cohort
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
OS comparison between Stanford and KPNC cohort
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
OS comparison between Stanford and KPNC cohort
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
OS comparison between Stanford and KPNC cohort
- Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S3 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients wt and mut Rb1.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S3 from Sex-dependent Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Demographics of patients wt and mut Rb1.