Aldo Domenico Milano
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Aldo Domenico Milano has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Domenico Parigino
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications - Federica Mazzone
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications - Giuseppe Fischetti
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications - Luca Savino
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications - Massimo Antonio Padalino
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications - Tomaso Bottio
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (5) , 1980
Extended Criteria Donor Use in Heart Transplantation: A Promising Strategy to Expand the Donor Pool
Background: To address organ shortage and reduce waitlist mortality, the use of extended criteria donors (ECDs) in heart transplantation is increasing. Methods: We retrospectively analysed outcomes in 236 heart transplant recipients: 140 received standard donor (SD) hearts and 96 received ECD hearts. Results: No significant differences were found in early or mid-term survival between the SD and ECD groups with a 30-day mortality rates of 13% vs. 10% (p = 0.662) and estimated 1-year survival of 75% (95% CI: 62.3–78.3%) and 71% (95% CI: 55.3–76.2%) (p = 0.556), respectively. Mechanical ventilation prior to transplant (p < 0.001), ischemic time (p = 0.022), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.011), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.022) were the only independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In our cohort, heart transplantation using ECD was not associated with increased early or mid-term adverse events. This approach may help expand the donor pool without compromising post-transplant outcomes.
- 5 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (5) , 1980
Open AccessExtended Criteria Donor Use in Heart Transplantation: A Promising Strategy to Expand the Donor Pool
Background: To address organ shortage and reduce waitlist mortality, the use of extended criteria donors (ECDs) in heart transplantation is increasing. Methods: We retrospectively analysed outcomes in 236 heart transplant recipients: 140 received standard donor (SD) hearts and 96 received ECD hearts. Results: No significant differences were found in early or mid-term survival between the SD and ECD groups with a 30-day mortality rates of 13% vs. 10% (p = 0.662) and estimated 1-year survival of 75% (95% CI: 62.3–78.3%) and 71% (95% CI: 55.3–76.2%) (p = 0.556), respectively. Mechanical ventilation prior to transplant (p < 0.001), ischemic time (p = 0.022), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.011), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.022) were the only independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In our cohort, heart transplantation using ECD was not associated with increased early or mid-term adverse events. This approach may help expand the donor pool without compromising post-transplant outcomes.
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2509
Retained Lead Fragments in Superior Vena Cava and Early Post-Transplant Outcomes: A Single Center Preliminary Retrospective Study
Background/Objectives: Retained fragments of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads are frequently observed after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), but their clinical relevance remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 179 adult patients who underwent OHT between January 2022 and January 2025. Post-transplant imaging was used to identify retained lead fragments. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of retained leads. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30, 90, and 150 days post-transplant. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Among 112 patients with pre-transplant CIEDs, 18 (16%) had retained intravascular lead fragments. These patients had significantly lower survival at 30 days (66.7% vs. 94.7%), 90 days (61.1% vs. 90.3%), and 150 days (55.0% vs. 83.5%) compared to those without retained fragments (log-rank p = 0.002). The presence of retained leads was independently associated with increased mortality (HR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.55–8.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: Retained CIED lead fragments are independently associated with higher early post-transplant mortality. These findings support the need for individualized intraoperative strategies to mitigate hardware-related risks in high-risk transplant candidates.
- 15 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2509
Open AccessRetained Lead Fragments in Superior Vena Cava and Early Post-Transplant Outcomes: A Single Center Preliminary Retrospective Study
Background/Objectives: Retained fragments of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads are frequently observed after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), but their clinical relevance remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 179 adult patients who underwent OHT between January 2022 and January 2025. Post-transplant imaging was used to identify retained lead fragments. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of retained leads. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30, 90, and 150 days post-transplant. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Among 112 patients with pre-transplant CIEDs, 18 (16%) had retained intravascular lead fragments. These patients had significantly lower survival at 30 days (66.7% vs. 94.7%), 90 days (61.1% vs. 90.3%), and 150 days (55.0% vs. 83.5%) compared to those without retained fragments (log-rank p = 0.002). The presence of retained leads was independently associated with increased mortality (HR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.55–8.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: Retained CIED lead fragments are independently associated with higher early post-transplant mortality. These findings support the need for individualized intraoperative strategies to mitigate hardware-related risks in high-risk transplant candidates.
- Open Access
- 29 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (15) , 5369
Kinetics of Procalcitonin, CRP, IL-6, and Presepsin in Heart Transplant Patients Undergoing Induction with Thymoglobulin (rATG)
Background/Objectives: Heart transplantation (HTx) is a lifesaving procedure for end-stage heart failure patients; however, postoperative infections remain a major challenge due to immunosuppressive therapy and surgical complications. Traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have limitations in distinguishing infections from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Emerging markers such as Presepsin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) may improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the kinetics and reliability of these four inflammatory biomarkers in heart transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 126 patients who underwent HTx at Policlinic of Bari between January 2022 and November 2024. Patients were categorized into infected (n = 26) and non-infected (n = 100) groups based on clinical and microbiological criteria. Biomarkers (CRP, PCT, Presepsin, and IL-6) were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U test and logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of infection. Results: CRP and PCT levels differed significantly between the groups only on day 10, limiting their use as early infection markers. In contrast, Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in infected patients from day 1 (p < 0.001), whereas IL-6 levels showed significant differences from day 3 onward. Presepsin showed the strongest association with infection in the early postoperative phase. Conclusions: Presepsin and IL-6 outperformed CRP and PCT in detecting early postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients. Their early elevation supports their use as reliable markers for guiding timely clinical intervention and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts and with different immunosuppressive regimens.
- 29 July 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (15) , 5369
Open AccessKinetics of Procalcitonin, CRP, IL-6, and Presepsin in Heart Transplant Patients Undergoing Induction with Thymoglobulin (rATG)
Background/Objectives: Heart transplantation (HTx) is a lifesaving procedure for end-stage heart failure patients; however, postoperative infections remain a major challenge due to immunosuppressive therapy and surgical complications. Traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have limitations in distinguishing infections from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Emerging markers such as Presepsin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) may improve diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the kinetics and reliability of these four inflammatory biomarkers in heart transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 126 patients who underwent HTx at Policlinic of Bari between January 2022 and November 2024. Patients were categorized into infected (n = 26) and non-infected (n = 100) groups based on clinical and microbiological criteria. Biomarkers (CRP, PCT, Presepsin, and IL-6) were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U test and logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of infection. Results: CRP and PCT levels differed significantly between the groups only on day 10, limiting their use as early infection markers. In contrast, Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in infected patients from day 1 (p < 0.001), whereas IL-6 levels showed significant differences from day 3 onward. Presepsin showed the strongest association with infection in the early postoperative phase. Conclusions: Presepsin and IL-6 outperformed CRP and PCT in detecting early postoperative infections in heart transplant recipients. Their early elevation supports their use as reliable markers for guiding timely clinical intervention and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts and with different immunosuppressive regimens.
- 12 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 153-165
Surgical Treatment of Bicuspid Valve Syndrome
- 1 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 117-151
Pathology of Biological Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
- 1 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 117-151
Pathology of Biological Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
- Open Access
- 17 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10 (24) , 5934
Efficacy of Pulsatile Flow Perfusion in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Hemodynamic Energy and Vascular Reactivity
Background: The role of pulsatile (PP) versus non-pulsatile (NP) flow during a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still debated. This study’s aim was to analyze hemodynamic effects, endothelial reactivity and erythrocytes response during a CPB with PP or NP. Methods: Fifty-two patients undergoing an aortic valve replacement were prospectively randomized for surgery with either PP or NP flow. Pulsatility was evaluated in terms of energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE). Systemic (SVRi) and pulmonary (PVRi) vascular resistances, endothelial markers levels and erythrocyte nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) activity were collected at different perioperative time-points. Results: In the PP group, the resultant EEP was 7.3% higher than the mean arterial pressure (MAP), which corresponded to 5150 ± 2291 ergs/cm3 of SHE. In the NP group, the EEP and MAP were equal; no SHE was produced. The PP group showed lower SVRi during clamp-time (p = 0.06) and lower PVRi after protamine administration and during first postoperative hours (p = 0.02). Lower SVRi required a higher dosage of norepinephrine in the PP group (p = 0.02). Erythrocyte eNOS activity results were higher in the PP patients (p = 0.04). Renal function was better preserved in the PP group (p = 0.001), whereas other perioperative variables were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: A PP flow during a CPB results in significantly lower SVRi, PVRi and increased eNOS production. The clinical impact of increased perioperative vasopressor requirements in the PP group deserves further evaluation.
- 17 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10 (24) , 5934
Open AccessEfficacy of Pulsatile Flow Perfusion in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Hemodynamic Energy and Vascular Reactivity
Background: The role of pulsatile (PP) versus non-pulsatile (NP) flow during a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still debated. This study’s aim was to analyze hemodynamic effects, endothelial reactivity and erythrocytes response during a CPB with PP or NP. Methods: Fifty-two patients undergoing an aortic valve replacement were prospectively randomized for surgery with either PP or NP flow. Pulsatility was evaluated in terms of energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE). Systemic (SVRi) and pulmonary (PVRi) vascular resistances, endothelial markers levels and erythrocyte nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) activity were collected at different perioperative time-points. Results: In the PP group, the resultant EEP was 7.3% higher than the mean arterial pressure (MAP), which corresponded to 5150 ± 2291 ergs/cm3 of SHE. In the NP group, the EEP and MAP were equal; no SHE was produced. The PP group showed lower SVRi during clamp-time (p = 0.06) and lower PVRi after protamine administration and during first postoperative hours (p = 0.02). Lower SVRi required a higher dosage of norepinephrine in the PP group (p = 0.02). Erythrocyte eNOS activity results were higher in the PP patients (p = 0.04). Renal function was better preserved in the PP group (p = 0.001), whereas other perioperative variables were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: A PP flow during a CPB results in significantly lower SVRi, PVRi and increased eNOS production. The clinical impact of increased perioperative vasopressor requirements in the PP group deserves further evaluation.