Taito Murakami
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Taito Murakami has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Masatomo Yashima
Department of Chemistry School of Science Institute of Science Tokyo 2‐12‐1‐W4‐17, O‐okayama Meguro‐ku Tokyo 152‐8551 Japan
2 shared publications James R. Hester
Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) New Illawarra Rd Lucas Heights NSW 2234 Australia
1 shared publication- James R. Hester
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
1 shared publication - Kotaro Fujii
Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Institute of Science Tokyo, 2-12-1-W4-17, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
1 shared publication Maxim Avdeev
Department of Chemistry, School of Science Tokyo Institute of Technology 2‐12‐1‐W4‐17, O‐okayama Meguro‐ku Tokyo 152–8551 Japan
1 shared publicationRiho Morikawa
Department of Chemistry, School of Science Tokyo Institute of Technology 2‐12‐1‐W4‐17, O‐okayama Meguro‐ku Tokyo 152–8551 Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 19 December 2022
- Published by Wiley in Advanced Functional Materials
- Vol. 33 (7)
High Proton Conductivity in β‐Ba2ScAlO5 Enabled by Octahedral and Intrinsically Oxygen‐Deficient Layers
Proton conductors are promising materials for clean energy, but most available materials exhibit sufficient conductivity only when chemically substituted to create oxygen vacancies, which often leads to difficulty in sample preparation and chemical instability. Recently, proton conductors based on hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides have been attracting attention as they exhibit high proton conductivity even without the chemical substitutions. However, their conduction mechanism has been elusive so far. Herein, taking three types of oxides with different stacking patterns of oxygen‐deficient layers (β‐Ba2ScAlO5, α‐Ba2Sc0.83Al1.17O5, and BaAl2O4) as examples, the roles of close‐packed double‐octahedral layers and oxygen‐deficient layers in proton conduction are shown. It is found that “undoped” β‐Ba2ScAlO5, which adopts a structure having alternating double‐octahedral layer and double‐tetrahedral layer with intrinsically oxygen‐deficient hexagonal BaO (h') layer, shows high proton conductivity (≈10−3 S cm−1 above 300 °C), comparable to representative proton conductors. In contrast, the structurally related oxides α‐Ba2Sc0.83Al1.17O5 and BaAl2O4 exhibit lower conductivity. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations revealed that protons in β‐Ba2ScAlO5 migrate through the double‐octahedral layer, while the h′ layer plays the role of a “proton reservoir” that supplies proton carriers to the proton‐conducting double‐octahedral layers. The distinct roles of the two layers in proton conduction provide a strategy for developing high‐performance proton conductors.
- 19 December 2022
- Published by Wiley in Advanced Functional Materials
- Vol. 33 (7)
Open AccessHigh Proton Conductivity in β‐Ba2ScAlO5 Enabled by Octahedral and Intrinsically Oxygen‐Deficient Layers
Proton conductors are promising materials for clean energy, but most available materials exhibit sufficient conductivity only when chemically substituted to create oxygen vacancies, which often leads to difficulty in sample preparation and chemical instability. Recently, proton conductors based on hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides have been attracting attention as they exhibit high proton conductivity even without the chemical substitutions. However, their conduction mechanism has been elusive so far. Herein, taking three types of oxides with different stacking patterns of oxygen‐deficient layers (β‐Ba2ScAlO5, α‐Ba2Sc0.83Al1.17O5, and BaAl2O4) as examples, the roles of close‐packed double‐octahedral layers and oxygen‐deficient layers in proton conduction are shown. It is found that “undoped” β‐Ba2ScAlO5, which adopts a structure having alternating double‐octahedral layer and double‐tetrahedral layer with intrinsically oxygen‐deficient hexagonal BaO (h') layer, shows high proton conductivity (≈10−3 S cm−1 above 300 °C), comparable to representative proton conductors. In contrast, the structurally related oxides α‐Ba2Sc0.83Al1.17O5 and BaAl2O4 exhibit lower conductivity. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations revealed that protons in β‐Ba2ScAlO5 migrate through the double‐octahedral layer, while the h′ layer plays the role of a “proton reservoir” that supplies proton carriers to the proton‐conducting double‐octahedral layers. The distinct roles of the two layers in proton conduction provide a strategy for developing high‐performance proton conductors.
High Oxide‐Ion Conductivity in a Hexagonal Perovskite‐Related Oxide Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 with Cation Site Preference and Interstitial Oxide Ions
Solid oxide‐ion conductors are crucial for enabling clean and efficient energy devices such as solid oxide fuel cells. Hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides have been placed at the forefront of high‐performance oxide‐ion conductors, with Ba7Nb4−xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0−0.1) being an archetypal example. Herein, high oxide‐ion conductivity and stability under reducing conditions in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 are reported by investigating the solid solutions Ba7Ta4–xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0.2−0.7). Neutron diffraction indicates a large number of interstitial oxide ions in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15, leading to a high level of oxide‐ion conductivity (e.g., 1.08 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 377 °C). The conductivity of Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 is higher than that of Ba7Nb4MoO20 and conventional yttria‐stabilized zirconia. In contrast to Ba7Nb4−xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0−0.1), the oxide‐ion conduction in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 is dominant even in highly reducing atmospheres (e.g., oxygen partial pressure of 1.6 × 10−24 atm at 909 °C). From structural analyses of the synchrotron X‐ray diffraction data for Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15, contrasting X‐ray scattering powers of Ta5+ and Mo6+ allow identification of the preferential occupation of Mo6+ adjacent to the intrinsically oxygen‐deficient layers, as supported by DFT calculations. The high conductivity and chemical and electrical stability in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 provide a strategy for the development of solid electrolytes based on hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides.
High Oxide‐Ion Conductivity in a Hexagonal Perovskite‐Related Oxide Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 with Cation Site Preference and Interstitial Oxide Ions
Solid oxide‐ion conductors are crucial for enabling clean and efficient energy devices such as solid oxide fuel cells. Hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides have been placed at the forefront of high‐performance oxide‐ion conductors, with Ba7Nb4−xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0−0.1) being an archetypal example. Herein, high oxide‐ion conductivity and stability under reducing conditions in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 are reported by investigating the solid solutions Ba7Ta4–xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0.2−0.7). Neutron diffraction indicates a large number of interstitial oxide ions in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15, leading to a high level of oxide‐ion conductivity (e.g., 1.08 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 377 °C). The conductivity of Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 is higher than that of Ba7Nb4MoO20 and conventional yttria‐stabilized zirconia. In contrast to Ba7Nb4−xMo1+xO20+x/2 (x = 0−0.1), the oxide‐ion conduction in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 is dominant even in highly reducing atmospheres (e.g., oxygen partial pressure of 1.6 × 10−24 atm at 909 °C). From structural analyses of the synchrotron X‐ray diffraction data for Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15, contrasting X‐ray scattering powers of Ta5+ and Mo6+ allow identification of the preferential occupation of Mo6+ adjacent to the intrinsically oxygen‐deficient layers, as supported by DFT calculations. The high conductivity and chemical and electrical stability in Ba7Ta3.7Mo1.3O20.15 provide a strategy for the development of solid electrolytes based on hexagonal perovskite‐related oxides.