Elizabeth L. Carpenter

Choledocholithiasis remains a common disease process to treat in modern medicine, but few are aware of its fascinating history. Starting with the preliminary understandings of ancient civilizations, significant strides in anatomic and pathologic characterization were made during the 16–18th centuries. In the latter half of the nineteenth century, the first cholecystectomy was performed, crossing an important surgical milestone that opened the door to further biliary intervention. Diagnostic advances were made and imaging techniques improved in the twentieth century, notably with Dr. George Berci’s groundbreaking advancement of cholangiography and performance of the first endoscopic common bile duct exploration. The development of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the 1970s and the introduction of laparoscopy brought the management of biliary disease into the modern era. In the future, we look towards improvements in safety, imaging techniques, instrumentation, and teaching strategies, among others, to further the field. In this article, we review the history of choledocholithiasis and the medical pioneers, importantly Dr. George Berci, who revolutionized the endoscopic and surgical treatment of this disease.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma outcomes are influenced by sociodemographic factors, including health insurance. Military beneficiaries, which include servicemembers, veterans, and their families, are often treated in civilian settings with TRICARE or Veterans Affairs acting as an insurance payor. We sought to examine outcomes among military and veteran beneficiaries with localized pancreatic cancer treated in civilian hospitals using the National Cancer Database. Materials and Methods: Patients age <65 with stage I-III PDAC from 2010 to 2020 with private or other government insurance were included. Stage-stratified overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Logistic regression models were used to examine receipt of therapy and postoperative mortality. Survival analysis was examined after propensity score matching. Results: Among 21,691 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 781 had other government insurance. Military beneficiaries were more likely than privately insured patients to be male and Black, and to live in low-income and rural areas. They traveled further for care and started treatment later. Furthermore, military beneficiaries were less likely to receive chemotherapy and undergo surgery. After adjusting for clinicopathologic factors, postoperative mortality was higher for military beneficiaries at 30 days (odds ratio 3.51, 95% confidence interval 1.70-7.27) and 90 days (odds ratio 3.36, 95% confidence interval 1.89-5.96). Median overall survival for privately insured patients was 18.5 months versus 14.7 for military (P < .001). Military insurance remained independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29; P = .015). After propensity score matching, stage-stratified overall survival remained inferior for military beneficiaries (P = .004). Conclusions: Among patients with localized pancreatic cancer, military beneficiaries were less likely to receive cancer treatment, had worse postoperative mortality, and experienced worse risk-adjusted overall survival versus individuals with private insurance. Further research is needed to investigate potential disparities in access to care and treatment outcomes among military beneficiaries and to evaluate policies aimed at closing this gap.

Background: The emergence of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has significantly improved survival outcomes in later-stage melanoma. However, the efficacy of these treatments remains limited, with around 50% of later-stage melanoma patients experiencing recurrence. As variable response rates to CPIs persist, the development of cancer vaccines has emerged as a potential strategy to augment antitumor immune responses. Results: This review compares two promising personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine trials in advanced melanoma: Elios Therapeutics’ Tumor Lysate (TL) vaccine and Moderna’s mRNA-4157 vaccine. The TL vaccine, which utilizes yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) loaded with autologous tumor lysate, and the mRNA-4157 vaccine, which encodes up to 34 patient-specific neoantigens, both aim to stimulate robust tumor-specific immune responses. Both trials were phase 2b randomized studies, with Elios Therapeutics’ trial employing a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, while Moderna’s was open-label. Both trials had roughly equivalent sample sizes (n = 187 and n = 157, respectively) with similar demographics and disease characteristics. The TL trial reported improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52 (p < 0.01) over 36 months, whereas the mRNA-4157 trial demonstrated improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) with an HR of 0.56 (p = 0.053) over 18 months. The TL vaccine exhibited lower rates of related grade 3 adverse events (<1%) compared to the mRNA vaccine (12%). Key differences between the two trials include the use of CPIs, with 100% of patients in the mRNA trial receiving pembrolizumab versus 37% of the patients in the TL trial receiving either an anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4. The production processes also varied significantly, with the mRNA vaccine requiring individualized sequencing and a 9-week production time, while the TL vaccine utilized tumor lysate with a 1–3-day production time. Conclusions: While both vaccines demonstrated promising efficacy, future phase 3 trials are needed to further evaluate their potential as adjuvant therapies for melanoma. This review highlights the comparative strengths and limitations of these vaccine platforms, providing insight into the evolving landscape of adjuvant cancer vaccines.

Checkpoint inhibitors have invigorated cancer immunotherapy research, including cancer vaccination. Classic early phase trial design and endpoints used in developing chemotherapy are not suited for evaluating all forms of cancer treatment. Peripheral T cell response dynamics have demonstrated inconsistency in assessing the efficacy of cancer vaccination. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), reflect the local tumor microenvironment and may prove a superior endpoint in cancer vaccination trials. Cancer vaccines may also promote success in combination immunotherapy treatment of weakly immunogenic tumors. This review explores the impact of TILs as an endpoint for cancer vaccination in multiple malignancies, summarizes the current literature regarding TILs analysis, and discusses the challenges of providing validity and a standardized implementation of this approach.

Background Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) provides the best opportunity for prolonged survival. Eligibility for metastasectomy has expanded with technical advancements including parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH). Meanwhile, enthusiasm for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased, though this approach may be preferentially utilized for technically straightforward cases. The purpose of this study is to characterize modern trends in open versus MIS approaches to partial hepatectomy and anatomic hepatectomy for CRLM within a nationwide cohort. Methods The American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was used to investigate trends in MIS versus open hepatectomy for CRLM from 2015 to 2019. We examined baseline clinicopathologic and disease-related characteristics and compared trends in treatments over the study period. Results A total of 7457 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were identified (1367 MIS, 6090 open). Patients had similar clinicopathologic features between the two groups. Patients undergoing MIS resection less frequently received neoadjuvant therapy (51.1% vs 64.0%, p < 0.001) or concurrent intraoperative ablation (15.0% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001). Patients with tumors < 2 cm (34.9% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) or only one to two tumors (82.8% vs 65.0%, p < 0.001) more commonly underwent MIS. MIS and open partial hepatectomies both significantly increased over the study period, but open partial hepatectomy increased at a greater rate than MIS (p < 0.001). Rates of anatomic resections have remained the same, with a greater proportion performed using an open approach (34.9% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001). Rates of operations consisting of > 1 concurrent partial hepatectomy are stable, but significantly more likely to be performed open (p < 0.001). Conclusions Hepatectomy for CRLM has increased from a rise in partial hepatectomy, potentially translating to increased use of PSH. Current trends suggest MIS approaches appear to be increasing, but selectively implemented for patients with less technically demanding disease characteristics. Educational efforts should be directed towards increased dissemination of parenchymal-sparing MIS techniques for more complex resections.

Introduction: The 2020 Commission on Cancer accreditation standards 5.7 and 5.8 address total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and lymph node sampling for lung cancer. The purpose of this review was to assess our institution’s compliance with these operative standards, which will be required in 2022 and 2023, and provide recommendations to other military training facilities seeking to comply with these standards. Materials and Methods: A 2018-2020 single institution chart review was performed of operative and pathology reports. Identified deficits were addressed in meetings with colorectal and thoracic surgery leadership, and cases were followed to reassess compliance. Results: A total of 12 rectal and 48 lung cancer cases met the inclusion criteria and were examined. Pre-intervention compliance for standards 5.7 and 5.8 was 58% and 35%, respectively, because of inadequate synoptic reporting and lymph node sampling. After intervention, compliance was 100%. Conclusions: Our institution requires changes to comply with new standards, including in areas of documentation and systematic pulmonary lymph node sampling. We provide lessons learned from our own institutional experience, including practical tips and recommendations to achieve compliance. All military training facilities performing lung and rectal oncologic resections should conduct an internal review of applicable cases in preparation for upcoming American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer site visits.

Background A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine was conducted in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. Dendritic cells (DCs) were harvested with and without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). This analysis investigates differences in clinical outcomes and RNA gene expression between DC harvest methods. Methods The TLPLDC vaccine is created by loading autologous tumor lysate into yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) and exposing them to phagocytosis by DCs. For DC harvest, patients had a direct blood draw or were pretreated with G-CSF before blood draw. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive TLPLDC or placebo. Differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RNA-seq analysis was performed on the total RNA of TLPLDC + G and TLPLDC vaccines to compare gene expression between groups. Results 144 patients were randomized: 103 TLPLDC (47 TLPLDC/56 TLPLDC + G) and 41 placebo (19 placebo/22 placebo + G). Median follow-up was 27.0 months. Both 36-month DFS (55.8% vs. 24.4% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.010) and OS (94.2% vs. 69.8% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.024) were improved in TLPLDC compared to TLPLDC + G or placebo, respectively. When compared to TLPLDC + G vaccine, RNA-seq from TLPLDC vaccine showed upregulation of genes associated with DC maturation and downregulation of genes associated with DC suppression or immaturity. Conclusions Patients receiving TLPLDC vaccine without G-CSF had improved OS and DFS. Outcomes remained similar between patients receiving TLPLDC + G and placebo. Direct DC harvest without G-CSF had higher expression of genes linked to DC maturation, likely improving clinical efficacy.

Background Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is gaining popularity due to improved perioperative outcomes over open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of MIDP and ODP using patients within a nationwide cohort. Methods The American College of Surgeons’ National Quality Improvement Program (2014–2018) was used to evaluate incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) as well as 30-day composite major morbidity for patients undergoing MIDP vs. ODP. Matching was performed with a Mahalanobis-distance model for demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, and benign versus malignant pathology. Outcomes were assessed via weighted multiple logistic regression. Results A total of 3940 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (1978 MIDP, 1962 ODP). After matching, 2985 patients were included (1978 MIDP, 1007 ODP). The rates of major morbidity (8.65% MIDP vs. 9.76% ODP, p = 0.37) were similar between groups. The MIDP group was found to have significantly decreased length of stay (5.6 vs. 7 days, p ≤ 0.001), but greater rates (12.54% MIDP vs. 9.35% ODP, p = 0.02) of post-operative fistula. Conclusions When matched for baseline patient characteristics, MIDP was associated with shorter length of hospitalization with similar rates of morbidity compared to ODP. However, MIDP was associated with significantly increased rates of POPF. Further studies are needed to investigate this difference in POPF rate, and determine how to optimize MIDP surgical technique to reduce this risk.