Amit Gulati

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are rapidly gaining prominence, owing to the associated expanding clinical applications and therapeutic potential in interventional cardiology. Moreover, a growing body of evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses supports the efficacy of DCBs across a broad spectrum of coronary lesions, positioning these devices as a viable, stent-free alternative to conventional strategies. DCBs aim to lower the risks inherent to stent implantation, such as stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to enable abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients. Although drug-eluting stents (DESs) remain the current standard in percutaneous coronary intervention, DCBs are emerging as a novel and promising option in diverse clinical settings beyond ISR, including de novo lesions in both small and large vessels, bifurcation disease, patients with a high risk of bleeding, and even acute coronary syndromes. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the evolving role, evidence base, and expanding indications of DCB-related therapy beyond ISR.

For systemic diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, systemic vasculitis, myopathies, and mixed connective tissue diseases, cardiac disease is a major contributing factor for morbidity and mortality. The cardiovascular manifestations are the result of various pathophysiological components, which complicate management. Furthermore, the signs and symptoms can be subtle and missed due to the complex nature of the underlying condition. As a result, various imaging approaches play an imperative role in diagnosis and prognosis. The evolving role of these modalities could lead to risk stratification and improved therapies in the future. In conclusion, our review article will highlight the role of cardiac imaging in the evaluation of cardiac involvement for systemic diseases.

Patients admitted to the hospital can develop thrombocytopenia due to multifactorial causes. It can be pseudo-thrombocytopenia or true thrombocytopenia. Among patients admitted for chest pain, coronary angiography (CAG) is a common diagnostic test to evaluate patients for coronary artery disease (CAD). Normally, patients undergoing angiogram receive antiplatelets and anticoagulants pre-catheterization, and platelet aggregation inhibitor agents are sometimes used during and after CAG like in patients with high thrombus burden. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors are a type of platelet antiaggregant agents that can cause severe thrombocytopenia in few cases. We present a case of a 68-year-old patient who came to the emergency department with inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent angiography and had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) done. He was administered tirofiban during the angiogram that caused acute severe thrombocytopenia decreasing platelets count to 4000/microliter within one day. Patients' platelets gradually recovered after platelets transfusion.

Hyperkalemic paralysis in the setting of acute renal failure can lead to a missed or delayed diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency as the raised potassium can be attributed to the renal failure. Acute kidney injury as the presenting manifestation in an adrenal crisis due to Addison’s disease has been rarely reported in the literature. Here, we present the case of a young 37‐year‐old male who came with hyperkalemic paralysis and acute renal failure needing emergent hemodialysis. He had no past medical history and no medication history. His hyponatremia, hypotension, and hyperkalemia pointed to a picture of adrenal insufficiency confirmed by undetectable serum cortisol, elevated ACTH, renin, and low aldosterone levels and imaging. Replacement steroid therapy was given, and the patient made a steady recovery. He was advised on the importance of compliance to treatment at discharge to prevent another crisis event. Acute renal failure with hyperkalemia as a presenting manifestation of Addison’s disease can be very misleading. It is especially important to be vigilant of adrenal insufficiency in such patients as the hyperkalemia is resistant to standard therapy of insulin dextrose and can precipitate fatal arrhythmia if treatment is delayed.

Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard procedure to distinguish tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) from bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Published studies assessed the accuracy of TTE for BAV under ideal conditions. Conversely, we aimed at assessing accuracy of TTE for BAV under routine conditions. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study of 216 adults included 132 men aged 62±14 years. Of these, 108 had BAV and 108 were age-matched individuals with TAV. All diagnoses were confirmed at surgery. We assessed TTE in two patient groups. First, in the (I) group of all 216 individuals, where we assessed accuracy for BAV according to the original diagnoses as documented by the primary investigators during original TTE examination. Second, we assessed accuracy for BAV according to expert re-evaluation in (II) all 158 TTE with availability of original recordings. Third, we performed a meta-analysis of published results on the accuracy of TTE for BAV according to PRISMA standards. Results: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (I) primary investigators was 46.3%, 97.2, and 71.8% as compared to (II) expert re-evaluation with 59.7%, 93%, and 77.8%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly higher at re-evaluation (PConclusions: The current study shows that TTE yields almost ideal diagnostic accuracy when ideal investigators examine ideal patients. However, the study also shows that TTE yields suboptimal diagnostic accuracy under routine conditions. TTE in non-tertiary care settings, concomitant aortic aneurysm, and presence of severe aortic valve calcification predict an inaccurate diagnosis of BAV.