Christoph Trautner
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Christoph Trautner has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Burkhard Haastert
Department of Biometrics and Epidemiology, (World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Diabetes), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
2 shared publicationsMichael Berger
Diabetes Research Institute, and the Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, (World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Diabetes), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
2 shared publicationsAndrea Icks
Department of Biometrics and Epidemiology, (World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Diabetes), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
1 shared publicationFrank Plum
Department of Ophthalmology, Krefeld City Hospital (Teaching Hospital of Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf) Krefeld, Germany
1 shared publicationGuido Giani
Department of Biometrics and Epidemiology, World Heath Organization Collaborating Center for Diabetes, Heinrieh Heine University Dusseldorf, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 July 1997
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1147-1153
Incidence of Blindness in Relation to Diabetes: A population-based study
OBJECTIVE: A reduction of diabetes-related blindness was declared a primary objective for Europe (St. Vincent Declaration). We collected data about incidence rates of blindness in the diabetic population compared with the nondiabetic population. Up to now, such data are scarce—even worldwide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A complete list of newly registered blindness allowance recipients was drawn up in the district of Württemberg-Hohenzollern, Germany, between 1990 and 1993. From these data, we estimated age-specific and standardized incidence rates of blindness in the entire, the diabetic, and the nondiabetic population, as well as relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS: There were 2,714 people meeting the inclusion criteria; 1,823 (67.2%) were female and 781 (28.8%) had diabetes. In 318 subjects, diabetes was likely to be the only cause of blindness; in 192 subjects, it was one of several contributory causes. Age of women was 73.9 ± 19.4 years (mean ± SD) and of men 63.3 ± 25.5 years. Results standardized to the (West) German population are as follows: incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years): total population: 13.5; diabetic population: 60.6; nondiabetic population: 11.6; relative risk: 5.2; attributable risk among exposed: 0.81; and population attributable risk: 0.14. The relative risks decreased considerably with increasing age. When the study is repeated to monitor the St. Vincent targets, a reduction in the incidence rate of blindness in the diabetic population by 17% will be detected with 95% power. CONCLUSIONS: Great relative and attributable risks, especially in younger age-groups, indicate the need for increased attention to preventive measures for microvascular complications.
- 1 July 1997
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1147-1153
Incidence of Blindness in Relation to Diabetes: A population-based study
OBJECTIVE: A reduction of diabetes-related blindness was declared a primary objective for Europe (St. Vincent Declaration). We collected data about incidence rates of blindness in the diabetic population compared with the nondiabetic population. Up to now, such data are scarce—even worldwide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A complete list of newly registered blindness allowance recipients was drawn up in the district of Württemberg-Hohenzollern, Germany, between 1990 and 1993. From these data, we estimated age-specific and standardized incidence rates of blindness in the entire, the diabetic, and the nondiabetic population, as well as relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS: There were 2,714 people meeting the inclusion criteria; 1,823 (67.2%) were female and 781 (28.8%) had diabetes. In 318 subjects, diabetes was likely to be the only cause of blindness; in 192 subjects, it was one of several contributory causes. Age of women was 73.9 ± 19.4 years (mean ± SD) and of men 63.3 ± 25.5 years. Results standardized to the (West) German population are as follows: incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years): total population: 13.5; diabetic population: 60.6; nondiabetic population: 11.6; relative risk: 5.2; attributable risk among exposed: 0.81; and population attributable risk: 0.14. The relative risks decreased considerably with increasing age. When the study is repeated to monitor the St. Vincent targets, a reduction in the incidence rate of blindness in the diabetic population by 17% will be detected with 95% power. CONCLUSIONS: Great relative and attributable risks, especially in younger age-groups, indicate the need for increased attention to preventive measures for microvascular complications.
- 1 September 1996
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 19 (9) , 1006-1009
Incidence of Lower Limb Amputations and Diabetes
OBJECTIVE We collected data on the incidence rates of amputations and their relative risk in diabetic subjects compared with the nondiabetic population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS From all three hospitals in a city of ∼ 160,000 inhabitants, we obtained complete lists of nontraumatic lower limb amputations. From each patient record, diabetic status was determined. We estimated age-specific and standardized incidence rates of amputations in the diabetic and nondiabetic populations and in the entire population, as well as the relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS Nontraumatic lower limb amputations were performed on 106 residents of Leverkusen (Germany) in 1990 and 1991. Of them, 82 (77.4%) had diabetes. Mean age was 72.0 years. In the case of multiple amputations, only the highest level was counted for the analysis. The following results were standardized to the German population. Incidence rates (100,000−1 · year−1) were determined to be as follows: for all amputations per total population, 33.8; for amputations in diabetic individuals per diabetic population, 209.2; for amputations in nondiabetic individuals per nondiabetic population, 9.4. Relative risk was 22.2; attributable risk among exposed, 0.96; population attributable risk, 0.72. When the study is repeated to monitor the St. Vincent targets (50% reduction), a reduction in the amputation rate in the diabetic population by 46% will be detected with 90% power. CONCLUSIONS We found incidence rates similar to those in the non-Indian population of the U.S. Great relative and population-attributable risks indicate that improving foot care in diabetic individuals appears to be the main target for the reduction of amputations in the general population.
- 1 September 1996
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 19 (9) , 1006-1009
Incidence of Lower Limb Amputations and Diabetes
OBJECTIVE We collected data on the incidence rates of amputations and their relative risk in diabetic subjects compared with the nondiabetic population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS From all three hospitals in a city of ∼ 160,000 inhabitants, we obtained complete lists of nontraumatic lower limb amputations. From each patient record, diabetic status was determined. We estimated age-specific and standardized incidence rates of amputations in the diabetic and nondiabetic populations and in the entire population, as well as the relative and attributable risks due to diabetes. RESULTS Nontraumatic lower limb amputations were performed on 106 residents of Leverkusen (Germany) in 1990 and 1991. Of them, 82 (77.4%) had diabetes. Mean age was 72.0 years. In the case of multiple amputations, only the highest level was counted for the analysis. The following results were standardized to the German population. Incidence rates (100,000−1 · year−1) were determined to be as follows: for all amputations per total population, 33.8; for amputations in diabetic individuals per diabetic population, 209.2; for amputations in nondiabetic individuals per nondiabetic population, 9.4. Relative risk was 22.2; attributable risk among exposed, 0.96; population attributable risk, 0.72. When the study is repeated to monitor the St. Vincent targets (50% reduction), a reduction in the amputation rate in the diabetic population by 46% will be detected with 90% power. CONCLUSIONS We found incidence rates similar to those in the non-Indian population of the U.S. Great relative and population-attributable risks indicate that improving foot care in diabetic individuals appears to be the main target for the reduction of amputations in the general population.