Olga Kampouropoulou

Background/Objectives: Adipokines are candidate biomarkers in critical illness due to their roles in immunity and metabolism, both profoundly altered in sepsis. Omentin-1, vaspin, and chemerin have been studied in selected septic cohorts, but not concurrently in a heterogeneous ICU population including both septic and non-septic patients. Methods: Prospective observational cohort of 200 consecutive ICU patients with 28-day follow-up. Biomarkers were measured by ELISA within 24 h of admission. Analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, Spearman correlations, ROC curves, and logistic regression with APACHE II and SOFA as comparators. Results: Vaspin was significantly higher in septic versus non-septic patients (406.4 [190.0–799.6] vs. 275.8 [101.8–559.8] pg/mL; p = 0.009). Omentin-1 was elevated in 28-day non-survivors (34.4 [22.5–56.1] vs. 25.1 [15.0–48.4] ng/mL; p = 0.037; AUROC 0.599), but lost significance after APACHE II adjustment (p = 0.295). Chemerin trended lower in non-survivors (p = 0.099); in septic patients, it correlated inversely with SOFA (r = −0.43) and lactate (r = −0.40), both p < 0.001. IL-6 and IL-10 were higher in non-survivors; IL-10 predicted 28-day mortality (AUROC 0.783), comparable to APACHE II (0.785). Conclusions: Vaspin distinguishes sepsis in mixed ICU populations. Omentin-1 shows a severity-driven association with mortality that does not survive APACHE II adjustment (AUROC 0.599, poor standalone discrimination), while chemerin inversely tracks hypoperfusion markers in septic patients, suggesting a potential counter-regulatory role requiring mechanistic confirmation. Individually, these adipokines do not add prognostic value beyond established severity scores, but their biological orthogonality to classical cytokines warrants exploration in multi-marker panel studies.

The outbreak of the new coronavirus strain SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) highlighted the need for appropriate feeding practices among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to describe feeding practices of intubated COVID-19 patients during their second week of hospitalization in the First Department of Critical Care Medicine, Evaggelismos General Hospital, and evaluate potential associations with all cause 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. We enrolled adult intubated COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between September 2020 and July 2021 and prospectively monitored until their hospital discharge. Of the 162 patients analyzed (52.8% men, 51.6% overweight/obese, mean age 63.2 ± 11.9 years), 27.2% of patients used parenteral nutrition, while the rest were fed enterally. By 30 days, 34.2% of the patients in the parenteral group had died compared to 32.7% of the patients in the enteral group (relative risk (RR) for the group receiving enteral nutrition = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.88–1.06, p = 0.120). Those in the enteral group demonstrated a lower duration of hospital stay (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97, p = 0.036) as well as mechanical ventilation support (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.99, p = 0.043). Enteral feeding during second week of ICU hospitalization may be associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization and stay in mechanical ventilation support among critically ill intubated patients with COVID-19.