Teoman Deger

Cell‐free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for response evaluation in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current study evaluated the modified fast aneuploidy screening test‐sequencing system (mFast‐SeqS), a quick, tumor‐agnostic and affordable ctDNA assay that requires a small input of DNA, to generate a genome‐wide aneuploidy (GWA) score in mCRPC patients, and correlated this to matched metastatic tumor biopsies. In this prospective multicenter study, GWA scores were evaluated from blood samples of 196 mCRPC patients prior to treatment (baseline) with taxanes (docetaxel and cabazitaxel) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone and enzalutamide), and from 74 mCRPC patients at an early timepoint during treatment (early timepoint; median 21 days). Z ‐scores per chromosome arm were tested for their association with tumor tissue genomic alterations. We found that a high tumor load in blood (GWA ^high ) at baseline was associated with poor response to ARSI [HR: 2.63 (95% CI: 1.86–3.72) P < 0.001] but not to taxanes. Interestingly, GWA ^high score at the early timepoint was associated with poor response to both ARSIs [HR: 6.73 (95% CI: 2.60–17.42) P < 0.001] and taxanes [2.79 (95% CI: 1.34–5.78) P = 0.006]. A significant interaction in Cox proportional hazards analyses was seen when combining GWA status and type of treatment (at baseline P = 0.008; early timepoint P = 0.018). In summary, detection of ctDNA in blood by mFast‐SeqS is cheap, fast and feasible, and could be used at different timepoints as a potential predictor for outcome to ARSI and taxane treatment in mCRPC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) colonoscopic surveillance is effective but burdensome. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive tool for disease detection and management. Here, we assessed which ctDNA assay might be most suitable for a ctDNA-based CRC screening/surveillance blood test. In this prospective, proof-of-concept study, patients with colonoscopies for Lynch surveillance or the National Colorectal Cancer screening program were included between 7 July 2019 and 3 June 2022. Blood was drawn, and if advanced neoplasia (adenoma with villous component, high-grade dysplasia, ≥10 mm, or CRC) was detected, it was analyzed for chromosomal copy number variations, single nucleotide variants, and genome-wide methylation (MeD-seq). Outcomes were compared with corresponding patients’ tissues and the MeD-seq results of healthy blood donors. Two Lynch carriers and eight screening program patients were included: five with CRC and five with advanced adenomas. cfDNA showed copy number variations and single nucleotide variants in one patient with CRC and liver metastases. Eight patients analyzed with MeD-seq showed clustering of Lynch-associated and sporadic microsatellite instable lesions separate from microsatellite stable lesions, as did healthy blood donors. In conclusion, whereas copy number changes and single nucleotide variants were only detected in one patient, cfDNA methylation profiles could discriminate all microsatellite instable advanced neoplasia, rendering this tool particularly promising for LS surveillance. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Multiple prognostic biomarkers, including circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts, exist in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, but none of them have been implemented into daily clinical care. The modified fast aneuploidy screening test‐sequencing system (mFast‐SeqS), which yields a genome‐wide aneuploidy score, is able to reflect the fraction of cell‐free tumour DNA (ctDNA) within cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) and may be a promising biomarker in mCRPC. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of dichotomized aneuploidy scores (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) as well as CTC counts (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) in 131 mCRPC patients prior to treatment with cabazitaxel. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 50 similarly treated mCRPC patients. We observed that, similar to the dichotomized CTC count [HR: 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI);1.84–4.62], dichotomized aneuploidy scores (HR: 3.24; CI: 2.12–4.94) significantly correlated with overall survival in mCRPC patients. We conclude that a dichotomized aneuploidy score from cfDNA is a prognostic marker for survival in mCRPC patients within our discovery cohort and in an independent mCRPC validation cohort. Therefore, this easy and robust minimally‐invasive assay can be readily implemented as a prognostic marker in mCRPC. A dichotomized aneuploidy score might also be used as a stratification factor in clinical studies to account for tumour load.

Intrapatient tumour heterogeneity is likely a major determinant of clinical outcome in cancer patients. To assess heterogeneity in a minimally invasive manner, methods to perform single circulating tumour cell (CTC) genomics at high resolution are necessary. However, due to the rarity of CTCs, development of such methods is challenging. Here, we developed a modular single CTC analysis pipeline to assess intrapatient heterogeneity by copy number (CN) profiling. To optimize this pipeline, spike‐in experiments using MCF‐7 breast cancer cells were performed. The VyCAP puncher system was used to isolate single cells. The quality of whole genome amplification (WGA) products generated by REPLI‐g and Ampli1™ methods, as well as the results from the Illumina Truseq and the Ampli1™ LowPass library preparation techniques, was compared. Moreover, a bioinformatic pipeline was designed to generate CN profiles from single CTCs. The optimal combination of Ampli1™ WGA and Illumina Truseq library preparation was successfully validated on patient‐derived CTCs. In conclusion, we developed a novel modular pipeline to isolate single CTCs and subsequently generate detailed patient‐derived CN profiles that allow assessment of intrapatient heterogeneity in future studies.

ESR1 methylation was proposed as mechanism for endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer patients. To evaluate its potential as a minimally invasive biomarker, we investigated the feasibility of measuring ESR1 methylation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and its association with endocrine resistance. First, we provided evidence that demethylation in vitro restores ER expression. Subsequently, we found that ESR1 methylation in cfDNA was not enriched in endocrine-resistant versus endocrine-sensitive patients. Interestingly, we found a correlation between ESR1 methylation and age. Publicly available data confirm an age-related increase in ESR1 methylation in leukocytes, confounding the determination of the ESR1 methylation status of tumors using cfDNA.

Second‐line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has a low success rate (~ 20%). Circulating tumour‐derived DNA (ctDNA) levels may guide patient stratification, provided that an affordable and robust assay is available. Here, we investigate whether the modified fast aneuploidy screening test‐sequencing system (mFast‐SeqS) may provide such an assay. To this end, mFast‐SeqS was performed on cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) from 74 patients with mUC prior to treatment with pembrolizumab. Results were associated with corresponding tissue‐based profiles, plasma‐based variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and clinical response. We found that plasma‐derived mFast‐SeqS‐based aneuploidy scores significantly correlated with those observed in the corresponding tumour tissue as well as with the ctDNA level in the plasma. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a high aneuploidy score was independently associated with lack of clinical benefit from treatment with pembrolizumab. In conclusion, mFast‐SeqS provides a patient‐friendly, high‐throughput and affordable method to estimate ctDNA level. Following independent validation, this test could be used to stratify mUC patients for response prior to the initiation of treatment with pembrolizumab.

Monitoring treatment response in metastatic breast cancer currently consists mainly of radiological and clinical assessments. These methods have high inter-observer variation, suboptimal sensitivity to determine response to treatment and give little insight into the biological characteristics of the tumor. Assessing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) over time could be employed to address these limitations. Several ways to quantify and characterize ctDNA exist, based on somatic mutations, copy number variations, methylation, and global circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragment sizes and concentrations. These methods are being explored and technically validated, but to date none of these methods are applied clinically. We systematically reviewed the literature on the use of quantitative ctDNA measurements over time to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to find studies focusing on the use of cfDNA to longitudinally monitor treatment response in advanced breast cancer patients until October 2020. This resulted in a total of 33 studies which met the inclusion criteria. These studies were heterogeneous in (pre-)processing procedures, applied techniques and design. An association between ctDNA and treatment response was found in most of the included studies, independent of the applied assay. To implement ctDNA-based response monitoring into daily clinical practice for metastatic breast cancer patients, sample (pre-) processing procedures need to be standardized and large prospectively collected sample cohorts with well annotated clinical follow-up are required to establish its clinical validity.