Taylor D'AMore

Purpose: To retrospectively compare return to sport rates and subjective outcomes of patients who underwent open or endoscopic compartment release for the surgical management of chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent lower‐extremity fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome from June 2012 to June 2020. Eligibility included patients 15 to 45 years of age who identified as an athlete and had at least 6 months of follow‐up. Fasciotomies for trauma or infection were excluded. One surgeon exclusively performed each type of surgery. Postoperative outcome measures included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, the Marx Activity Scale, and a return to play survey. Results: In total, 24 patients (13 endoscopically assisted fasciotomies, 11 open fasciotomies) had a mean follow‐up of 3.8 ± 2.1 years; 19 patients returned to their sporting activity. No significant difference existed between return to play rates ( P = .630) or return to play times ( P = .351). There were no significant differences between the groups in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score, Marx Activity Scale score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, pain score at rest, and during sporting activity. Overall satisfaction rates were found to be significantly greater in the endoscopically assisted fasciotomy group ( P = .041). Conclusions: In this small sample of heterogenous groups of patients, we found no significant differences in return to sport rates or subjective results after surgery. Patients experienced a high subjective recurrence rate. The endoscopically assisted fasciotomy group reported greater subjective patient satisfaction compared with the open fasciotomy group. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study, retrospective.

Introduction: In an attempt to improve price transparency, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) now requires hospitals to post clear, accessible pricing data for common procedures. We aimed to determine how many top orthopaedic hospitals are compliant with the new regulation and whether there was any correlation between hospital charges and outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: The hospital websites of the top 101 orthopaedic hospitals per the US News & World Report 2020-2021 were explored to assess compliance with the price transparency requirement. We recorded the gross inpatient charge, cash price, payer-specific negotiated charge, and deidentified maximum and minimum payer rates for THA and TKA. Outcome metrics included hospital ranking and Medicare risk-adjusted arthroplasty readmission and complication rates. Results: Although 94 hospitals (93%) posted some shoppable service information as required by CMS, only 21 hospitals (20%) were fully compliant. The mean inpatient charge for THA and TKA was $72,111 (range, $14,716 to $195,264), cash price was $39,027 (range, $2,920 to $110,858), and minimum and maximum payer rates were $16,140 and $57,949, respectively. Better hospital ranking was weakly correlated with higher charges (coefficient 0.223; P = 0.049). No correlation between charges and complications (P = 0.266) or readmissions (P = 0.735) was observed. Conclusion: Few hospitals are fully compliant with the new CMS price transparency regulations. We found a wide range of hospital charges for THA and TKA without correlation with complications or readmissions. Although efforts by CMS to increase price transparency should be welcomed, increased costs should be justified by quality in the era of value-based care.

Objectives: While results following ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury in baseball players has been well documented, results following UCL injury in gymnasts are not well documented. As such, the purpose of this study was to report the operative and non-operative outcomes of UCL injury in gymnasts. Methods: Gymnasts who underwent UCL injury treatment whether non-operative or operative at a single institution were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years post-operatively. Patients were assessed with Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Andrews-Timmerman (A-T) Elbow score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) score and a custom return to play survey. Results: There were 11 patients who met inclusion criteria and complete follow-up was available in 9 patients. Overall, 6 patients were treated operatively (4 UCL reconstructions (UCLR) and 2 UCL repairs) and 3 patients were treated non-operatively. One UCLR was performed after 2 months of failed non-operative management. All patients were female with a mean age of 16.1 (range, 12-20) and mean BMI of 24.46 (range 19.2-34.1) at time of surgery or initial visit. Average follow-up was 4.04 years. Overall, 66.7% of operative versus 100% of non-operative were able to RTP at an average of 7.5 and 7 months, respectively. One re-injury was reported in the non-operative group, which was a re-dislocation of the elbow unrelated to gymnastics and was ultimately treated non-operatively. The mean KJOC, MEPS, A-T and qDASH scores for the operative group were 70.0 (range, 48.5-89), 97.5 (range, 95-100), 90.8 (range, 75-100) and 24.6 (range, 22.7-29.5), respectively. The mean scores for the non-operative group were 75.9 (range, 61-91.2), 71.7 (range, 65-75), 71.7 (range, 55-80) and 34.1 (range, 22.7-40.9), respectively. Conclusions: Both operative and non-operative treatments can be offered as successful treatment options for UCL injuries in gymnasts. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal management of UCL injuries in gymnasts.