Norbert Kienzl
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Norbert Kienzl has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christoph Strasser
BEST—Bioenergy and Sustainable Technologies GmbH, 8010 Graz, Austria
2 shared publications - Aekjuthon Phounglamcheik
Division of Energy Science, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Andrii Koveria
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Dnipro University of Technology, Dmytra Yavornytskoho Ave. 19/2, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine
1 shared publication - Gernot Krammer
Institute of Process and Particle Engineering, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria
1 shared publication - Hugo Stocker
Voestalpine Stahl Donawitz GmbH, 8700 Leoben, Austria
1 shared publication - Kentaro Umeki
Luleå University of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (17) , 7654
Co-Pyrolysis of Biomass with Bituminous Coal in a Fixed-Bed Reactor for Biofuel and Bioreducing Agents Production
In this paper, the interaction between caking bituminous coal (HC) and two types of biomass, namely sunflower husks (SFHs) and walnut shells (WSs), was studied via lab-scale fixed-bed reactor experiments and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The dynamics of volatile matter composition and weight loss changes were analyzed for the initial biomass types and their 1:1 blends with HC during co-pyrolysis. Derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) revealed that during the co-pyrolysis of HC with biomass, the number of reaction stages increased to four, compared to three during individual pyrolysis, indicating synergistic thermal behavior. The apparent activation energy (Ea) of the blends was higher (62.8 kJ/mol for SFH/HC and 61.8 kJ/mol for WS/HC) than that of the individual HC (55.1 kJ/mol), SFHs (43.8 kJ/mol), and WSs (52.4 kJ/mol), confirming intensified reaction complexity. Co-pyrolysis resulted in higher methane (CH4) production, with the CH4:HAc (acetic acid) ratio increasing from 1.2 (WSs) and 1.7 (SFHs) to 1.9 (WS/HC) and 3.3 (SFH/HC). The non-additive behavior of blends is established, indicating the interactions between biomass and HC during co-pyrolysis. These findings support a more resilient and sustainable approach to producing fuels and reducing agents, particularly through the utilization of agricultural residues and waste biomass.
- 25 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (17) , 7654
Open AccessCo-Pyrolysis of Biomass with Bituminous Coal in a Fixed-Bed Reactor for Biofuel and Bioreducing Agents Production
In this paper, the interaction between caking bituminous coal (HC) and two types of biomass, namely sunflower husks (SFHs) and walnut shells (WSs), was studied via lab-scale fixed-bed reactor experiments and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The dynamics of volatile matter composition and weight loss changes were analyzed for the initial biomass types and their 1:1 blends with HC during co-pyrolysis. Derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) revealed that during the co-pyrolysis of HC with biomass, the number of reaction stages increased to four, compared to three during individual pyrolysis, indicating synergistic thermal behavior. The apparent activation energy (Ea) of the blends was higher (62.8 kJ/mol for SFH/HC and 61.8 kJ/mol for WS/HC) than that of the individual HC (55.1 kJ/mol), SFHs (43.8 kJ/mol), and WSs (52.4 kJ/mol), confirming intensified reaction complexity. Co-pyrolysis resulted in higher methane (CH4) production, with the CH4:HAc (acetic acid) ratio increasing from 1.2 (WSs) and 1.7 (SFHs) to 1.9 (WS/HC) and 3.3 (SFH/HC). The non-additive behavior of blends is established, indicating the interactions between biomass and HC during co-pyrolysis. These findings support a more resilient and sustainable approach to producing fuels and reducing agents, particularly through the utilization of agricultural residues and waste biomass.
- Open Access
Characteristics of High-Temperature Torrefied Wood Pellets for Use in a Blast Furnace Injection System
As the iron and steel industry needs to cut its CO2 emissions drastically, much effort has been put into establishing new—less greenhouse-gas-intensive—production lines fueled by hydrogen and electricity. Blast furnaces, as a central element of hot iron production, are expected to lose importance, at least in European production strategies. Yet, blast furnaces could play a significant role in the transitional phase, as they allow for the implementation of another CO2-reducing fuel, carbonized wood reducing agents, as a substitute for coal in auxiliary injection systems, which are currently widely used. Wood carbonization yields vastly differing fuel types depending on the severity of the treatment process, mainly its peak temperature. The goal of this study is to define the lowest treatment temperature, i.e., torrefaction temperature, which results in a biogenic reducing agent readily employable in existing coal injection systems, focusing on their conveying properties. Samples of different treatment temperatures ranging from 285 to 340 °C were produced and compared to injection coal regarding their chemical and mechanical properties. The critical conveyability in a standard dense-phase pneumatic conveying system was demonstrated with a sample of pilot-scale high-temperature torrefaction.
Open AccessCharacteristics of High-Temperature Torrefied Wood Pellets for Use in a Blast Furnace Injection System
As the iron and steel industry needs to cut its CO2 emissions drastically, much effort has been put into establishing new—less greenhouse-gas-intensive—production lines fueled by hydrogen and electricity. Blast furnaces, as a central element of hot iron production, are expected to lose importance, at least in European production strategies. Yet, blast furnaces could play a significant role in the transitional phase, as they allow for the implementation of another CO2-reducing fuel, carbonized wood reducing agents, as a substitute for coal in auxiliary injection systems, which are currently widely used. Wood carbonization yields vastly differing fuel types depending on the severity of the treatment process, mainly its peak temperature. The goal of this study is to define the lowest treatment temperature, i.e., torrefaction temperature, which results in a biogenic reducing agent readily employable in existing coal injection systems, focusing on their conveying properties. Samples of different treatment temperatures ranging from 285 to 340 °C were produced and compared to injection coal regarding their chemical and mechanical properties. The critical conveyability in a standard dense-phase pneumatic conveying system was demonstrated with a sample of pilot-scale high-temperature torrefaction.
- Open Access
Self-Heating of Biochar during Postproduction Storage by O2 Chemisorption at Low Temperatures
Biochar is attracting attention as an alternative carbon/fuel source to coal in the process industry and energy sector. However, it is prone to self-heating and often leads to spontaneous ignition and thermal runaway during storage, resulting in production loss and health risks. This study investigates biochar self-heating upon its contact with O2 at low temperatures, i.e., 50–300 °C. First, kinetic parameters of O2 adsorption and CO2 release were measured in a thermogravimetric analyzer using biochar produced from a pilot-scale pyrolysis process. Then, specific heat capacity and heat of reactions were measured in a differential scanning calorimeter. Finally, a one-dimensional transient model was developed to simulate self-heating in containers and gain insight into the influences of major parameters. The model showed a good agreement with experimental measurement in a closed metal container. It was observed that char temperature slowly increased from the initial temperature due to heat released during O2 adsorption. Thermal runaway, i.e., self-ignition, was observed in some cases even at the initial biochar temperature of ca. 200 °C. However, if O2 is not permeable through the container materials, the temperature starts decreasing after the consumption of O2 in the container. The simulation model was also applied to examine important factors related to self-heating. The results suggested that self-heating can be somewhat mitigated by decreasing the void fraction, reducing storage volume, and lowering the initial char temperature. This study demonstrated a robust way to estimate the cooling demands required in the biochar production process.
Open AccessSelf-Heating of Biochar during Postproduction Storage by O2 Chemisorption at Low Temperatures
Biochar is attracting attention as an alternative carbon/fuel source to coal in the process industry and energy sector. However, it is prone to self-heating and often leads to spontaneous ignition and thermal runaway during storage, resulting in production loss and health risks. This study investigates biochar self-heating upon its contact with O2 at low temperatures, i.e., 50–300 °C. First, kinetic parameters of O2 adsorption and CO2 release were measured in a thermogravimetric analyzer using biochar produced from a pilot-scale pyrolysis process. Then, specific heat capacity and heat of reactions were measured in a differential scanning calorimeter. Finally, a one-dimensional transient model was developed to simulate self-heating in containers and gain insight into the influences of major parameters. The model showed a good agreement with experimental measurement in a closed metal container. It was observed that char temperature slowly increased from the initial temperature due to heat released during O2 adsorption. Thermal runaway, i.e., self-ignition, was observed in some cases even at the initial biochar temperature of ca. 200 °C. However, if O2 is not permeable through the container materials, the temperature starts decreasing after the consumption of O2 in the container. The simulation model was also applied to examine important factors related to self-heating. The results suggested that self-heating can be somewhat mitigated by decreasing the void fraction, reducing storage volume, and lowering the initial char temperature. This study demonstrated a robust way to estimate the cooling demands required in the biochar production process.