Rodney Stosic
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Rodney Stosic has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andrew J. McLachlan
Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
2 shared publications - David John Hunter
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2 shared publications - Peter R. Carroll
BPharm, MSc, PhD, Honorary Professor. The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
2 shared publications - Tom A. N. Wakefield
FiftyFive5 Ultimo New South Wales Australia
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 January 2022
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 25 (3) , 936-946
Osteoarthritis management: Does the pharmacist play a role in bridging the gap between what patients actually know and what they ought to know? Insights from a national online survey
Background: Guidelines encourage engagement in self‐care activities for osteoarthritis (OA), but there are gaps in consumers' knowledge about suitable choices for self‐care. Community pharmacists are in an ideal position to contribute to OA management through screening and supporting evidence‐based pain management choices. Prior research established an association between health literacy and advice‐seeking and appropriateness of analgesics choices (both lower in participants with limited health literacy) amongst people living with OA. This article explores the implications of these data for pharmacists in OA management.Methods: A national online survey was conducted amongst 628 adults aged 45–74 years, currently residing in Australia, with self‐reported symptoms of OA. All data were collected using a customized online questionnaire, which was completed only once. ‘Self‐reported symptoms of OA’ was based on six validated screening questions to identify people with OA without a formal clinical diagnosis.Results: Respondents matched the typical profile of people diagnosed with OA; more than half were female (56%), knees (59%) and hips (31%) were the primary affected joints and 74% were either overweight or obese. Self‐identification of OA was limited (41%). Overall, 38% self‐managed their pain, and limited health literacy was associated with less advice‐seeking. Efficacy and ease of use were the main reasons cited for prompting use across all classes of nonprescription analgesic, with less than 20% reporting recommendation from a pharmacist. Participants were managing their pain with an average of 1.74 (95% confidence interval: 1.60–1.88) analgesics, but 73% reported inadequate pain relief and 54% had disrupted sleep.Conclusion: Our findings highlight three key themes: lack of self‐identification of OA, suboptimal pain relief and limited use of the community pharmacist as a source of management advice. Equipping community pharmacists with tools to identify OA could bridge this gap. More research is needed to determine if it will improve consumers' ability to appropriately manage OA pain.Patient or Public Contribution: Consumers living with OA contributed to the study outcomes, reviewed the survey questionnaire for face validity and advised on plain language terminology.
- 8 January 2022
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 25 (3) , 936-946
Open AccessOsteoarthritis management: Does the pharmacist play a role in bridging the gap between what patients actually know and what they ought to know? Insights from a national online survey
Background: Guidelines encourage engagement in self‐care activities for osteoarthritis (OA), but there are gaps in consumers' knowledge about suitable choices for self‐care. Community pharmacists are in an ideal position to contribute to OA management through screening and supporting evidence‐based pain management choices. Prior research established an association between health literacy and advice‐seeking and appropriateness of analgesics choices (both lower in participants with limited health literacy) amongst people living with OA. This article explores the implications of these data for pharmacists in OA management.Methods: A national online survey was conducted amongst 628 adults aged 45–74 years, currently residing in Australia, with self‐reported symptoms of OA. All data were collected using a customized online questionnaire, which was completed only once. ‘Self‐reported symptoms of OA’ was based on six validated screening questions to identify people with OA without a formal clinical diagnosis.Results: Respondents matched the typical profile of people diagnosed with OA; more than half were female (56%), knees (59%) and hips (31%) were the primary affected joints and 74% were either overweight or obese. Self‐identification of OA was limited (41%). Overall, 38% self‐managed their pain, and limited health literacy was associated with less advice‐seeking. Efficacy and ease of use were the main reasons cited for prompting use across all classes of nonprescription analgesic, with less than 20% reporting recommendation from a pharmacist. Participants were managing their pain with an average of 1.74 (95% confidence interval: 1.60–1.88) analgesics, but 73% reported inadequate pain relief and 54% had disrupted sleep.Conclusion: Our findings highlight three key themes: lack of self‐identification of OA, suboptimal pain relief and limited use of the community pharmacist as a source of management advice. Equipping community pharmacists with tools to identify OA could bridge this gap. More research is needed to determine if it will improve consumers' ability to appropriately manage OA pain.Patient or Public Contribution: Consumers living with OA contributed to the study outcomes, reviewed the survey questionnaire for face validity and advised on plain language terminology.
- 2 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 75 (4) , 848-859
Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Self‐Care and Pain Management in Osteoarthritis: An Understanding of the Patient's Perspective
Objective: Management guidelines encourage self‐care in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA). We undertook this study to investigate the relationship between health literacy (HL) and appropriateness of selection of self‐care strategies in people with self‐reported symptoms of OA.Methods: We conducted an online national observational, demographically representative, cross‐sectional survey of adults (ages 45–74 years). The eligibility criterion of “self‐reported OA symptoms” was screened for using guideline‐endorsed clinical criteria. Participants completed a custom‐built questionnaire that included validated scales for HL, pain intensity, sleep quality, and OA function/disability. Management strategies were grouped into self‐care activities, analgesics, and complementary medicines, and analyses of appropriateness were based on predefined, evidence‐based quality indicators.Results: Of 6,800 participants, 628 met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. HL was categorized as follows: low (100 of 628, 15.9%), moderate (317 of 628, 50.5%), and excellent (211 of 628, 33.6%). In the past 7 days, mean pain intensity (0–10 scale) was 3.11 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.06–3.16), and 71.7% of participants (450 of 628) had not achieved adequate pain relief. In the past month, 54.1% (340 of 628) reported disrupted sleep. Participants managed their pain with multiple self‐care activities (mean 1.44; 95% CI 1.32–1.57), analgesics (mean 1.74; 95% CI 1.60–1.88), and complementary medicines (mean 1.01; 95% CI 0.90–1.12). There was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) interaction between HL and appropriateness of current management strategies (HL low, guideline‐recommended management strategies less likely). Higher HL did not always translate into making appropriate pain management choices.Conclusion: Appropriate selection and use of evidence‐based management options is critical for patients with OA to obtain the full benefits from their treatment. Knowledge about suitable choices for OA self‐care is suboptimal, and future education should be tailored to different levels of HL.
- 2 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 75 (4) , 848-859
Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Self‐Care and Pain Management in Osteoarthritis: An Understanding of the Patient's Perspective
Objective: Management guidelines encourage self‐care in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA). We undertook this study to investigate the relationship between health literacy (HL) and appropriateness of selection of self‐care strategies in people with self‐reported symptoms of OA.Methods: We conducted an online national observational, demographically representative, cross‐sectional survey of adults (ages 45–74 years). The eligibility criterion of “self‐reported OA symptoms” was screened for using guideline‐endorsed clinical criteria. Participants completed a custom‐built questionnaire that included validated scales for HL, pain intensity, sleep quality, and OA function/disability. Management strategies were grouped into self‐care activities, analgesics, and complementary medicines, and analyses of appropriateness were based on predefined, evidence‐based quality indicators.Results: Of 6,800 participants, 628 met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. HL was categorized as follows: low (100 of 628, 15.9%), moderate (317 of 628, 50.5%), and excellent (211 of 628, 33.6%). In the past 7 days, mean pain intensity (0–10 scale) was 3.11 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.06–3.16), and 71.7% of participants (450 of 628) had not achieved adequate pain relief. In the past month, 54.1% (340 of 628) reported disrupted sleep. Participants managed their pain with multiple self‐care activities (mean 1.44; 95% CI 1.32–1.57), analgesics (mean 1.74; 95% CI 1.60–1.88), and complementary medicines (mean 1.01; 95% CI 0.90–1.12). There was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) interaction between HL and appropriateness of current management strategies (HL low, guideline‐recommended management strategies less likely). Higher HL did not always translate into making appropriate pain management choices.Conclusion: Appropriate selection and use of evidence‐based management options is critical for patients with OA to obtain the full benefits from their treatment. Knowledge about suitable choices for OA self‐care is suboptimal, and future education should be tailored to different levels of HL.