JSJörg Schubert

Jörg Schubert

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Jörg Schubert has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Automated Cell Counting in CSF Diagnostics Revisited—Friend or Foe?

    by Axel Haarmann, Jörg Schubert, Udo Steigerwald, Michael K. Schuhmann

    Background/Objectives: The gold standard for cerebrospinal fluid leukocyte counting is manual counting in a Fuchs–Rosenthal chamber. Recent advances in automated body-fluid-counting systems, offering a time- and labor-saving solution, are challenging this dogma. Yet, the equivalence of diagnostic accuracy is still debated in the community. Methods: We compared manual and automated cell counting of cerebrospinal fluid samples of lumbar punctures and extraventricular drains with both low and high leukocyte counts, shedding light on the variability of results between man and machine. Results: Automated and manual cell counting showed a strong correlation across all samples, particularly in the subgroup of patients with fewer than 20 cells/µl, where outliers could become especially clinically relevant. Conclusions: We found the automated counting system to be highly accurate and not lacking in diagnostic sensitivity even at low cell counts, making it a powerful tool when used in the right clinical setting.


  • Open Access

    Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an online yoga intervention in high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers: the YINOTA-O-trial

    by Antonia Rabe, Almuth Friederike Keßler, Carsten Hagemann, Jörg Schubert, Elisabeth Jentschke

    Introduction High-grade glioma patients and their caregivers often suffer from distress and a lower quality of life. Results from studies with patients with mixed cancer entities suggest that yoga can be an effective support. However, it is unclear whether this also applies to high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers. This study aims to investigate the effects of mindfulness-based online yoga for patients and their caregivers on emotional distress, quality of life and stress-associated physiological parameters compared with a waiting control group (WCG). Methods & analysis The study is designed as a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Adult glioma patients (central nervous system WHO grades 3 and 4) and their caregivers will be recruited. Examined yoga instructors deliver the intervention (1 hour per week) in a synchronous format over 8 weeks via video conferencing. The WCG will receive standard care during the 8-week waiting period. Data will be collected before and after the end of the intervention and another 3 months later using questionnaires as well as blood serum and hair samples to evaluate biochemical stress parameters. Primary outcome is self-reported generalised anxiety and secondary outcomes are self-reported fear of progression, depression and quality of life as well as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)/dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), ferritin and hair cortisol. We hypothesise better outcomes in the intervention group compared with the WCG at all measurement points. 70 patients and 70 caregivers will be recruited consecutively. Primary endpoints are significant effect detections in the Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale-7 of patients and caregivers at the end of the intervention. Analyses of covariance will be performed to analyse the treatment effects. Ethics and dissemination The Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg approved the YINOTA-O (Yoga-Intervention bei Neuroonkologischen Tumorpatienten und deren Angehörigen - Online) study on 26 October 2021 (No.185/18-me). Results will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00029554.


  • Open Access

    Avoidable Blood Loss in Critical Care and Patient Blood Management: Scoping Review of Diagnostic Blood Loss

    by Philipp Helmer, Sebastian Hottenrott, Andreas Steinisch, Daniel Röder, Jörg Schubert, Udo Steigerwald, Suma Choorapoikayil, Patrick Meybohm

    Background: Anemia remains one of the most common comorbidities in intensive care patients worldwide. The cause of anemia is often multifactorial and triggered by underlying disease, comorbidities, and iatrogenic factors, such as diagnostic phlebotomies. As anemia is associated with a worse outcome, especially in intensive care patients, unnecessary iatrogenic blood loss must be avoided. Therefore, this scoping review addresses the amount of blood loss during routine phlebotomies in adult (>17 years) intensive care patients and whether there are factors that need to be improved in terms of patient blood management (PBM). Methods: A systematic search of the Medline Database via PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The reported daily blood volume for diagnostics and other relevant information from eligible studies were charted. Results: A total of 2167 studies were identified in our search, of which 38 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 interventional studies and 29 observational studies). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (37%) and Canada (13%). An increasing interest to reduce iatrogenic blood loss has been observed since 2015. Phlebotomized blood volume per patient per day was up to 377 mL. All interventional trials showed that the use of pediatric-sized blood collection tubes can significantly reduce the daily amount of blood drawn. Conclusion: Iatrogenic blood loss for diagnostic purposes contributes significantly to the development and exacerbation of hospital-acquired anemia. Therefore, a comprehensive PBM in intensive care is urgently needed to reduce avoidable blood loss, including blood-sparing techniques, regular advanced training, and small-volume blood collection tubes.