Jae Hyup Jung
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jae Hyup Jung has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jaihwan Kim
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4 shared publications - Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
3 shared publications - Jong-Chan Lee
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
3 shared publications - Kwangrok Jung
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3 shared publications - Bomi Kim
Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Inje University, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Bomi Kim
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 December 2023
- Published by The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver in Gut and Liver
- Vol. 18 (4) , 737-746
Analysis of Recent Improvement of Survival Outcomes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Upfront Surgery
Jae Hyup Jung, Seung Hyun Won, Kwangrok Jung, Jun Suh Lee, Jong-Chan Lee, Jin Won Kim, Yoo‑Seok Yoon, Jin-Hyeok Hwang, Ho‑Seong Han, Jaihwan Kim. Gut and Liver 2024;18:737-46. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl230303
- 26 December 2023
- Published by The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver in Gut and Liver
- Vol. 18 (4) , 737-746
Open AccessAnalysis of Recent Improvement of Survival Outcomes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Upfront Surgery
Jae Hyup Jung, Seung Hyun Won, Kwangrok Jung, Jun Suh Lee, Jong-Chan Lee, Jin Won Kim, Yoo‑Seok Yoon, Jin-Hyeok Hwang, Ho‑Seong Han, Jaihwan Kim. Gut and Liver 2024;18:737-46. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl230303
- 9 October 2022
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 49 (2) , 306-315
Impact of histopathological type on the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 9 October 2022
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 49 (2) , 306-315
Impact of histopathological type on the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 6 April 2022
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 37 (7) , 1342-1348
Prediction model using clinical factors for radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Background and Aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires radiation. This study aimed to assess the clinical factors influencing radiation exposure and devise a scoring model for predicting high‐dose radiation exposure.Methods: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases recorded between 2016 and 2019 in a single tertiary teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A scoring model was created by bootstrap method in a derivation cohort (2016–2018) and was assessed in a validation cohort (2019).Results: Out of 4223 ERCPs, 2983 and 1240 cases were included in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, 746 cases (top 25%) comprised the high‐dose exposure group, and 2237 cases (bottom 75%) comprised the low‐dose exposure group. Nine clinical parameters associated with high‐dose exposure were male, pancreatic sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation, biliary or pancreatic drainage, procedures with contrast dye, endoscopist, in‐hospital ERCP, and spot image. Stone removal was included by bootstrap analysis. As presented in a nomogram, the weight score of each variable was as follows: male, 1; pancreatic sphincterotomy, 3; balloon dilatation, 7; stone removal, 3; biliary or pancreatic drainage, 5; procedures with contrast dye, 1; endoscopist B, 4; endoscopist C, 5; in‐hospital procedure, 3; and spot image, 3. A total score ≥ 15 suggested a high‐dose radiation exposure. The sensitivity and specificity of the model for high‐dose exposure were 0.562 and 0.813, respectively. In the validation cohort, the model showed reasonable predictability.Conclusions: Various factors were associated with radiation exposure. The simple scoring system in this study could guide endoscopists in predicting the risk of high‐dose radiation exposure.
- 6 April 2022
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 37 (7) , 1342-1348
Prediction model using clinical factors for radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Background and Aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires radiation. This study aimed to assess the clinical factors influencing radiation exposure and devise a scoring model for predicting high‐dose radiation exposure.Methods: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases recorded between 2016 and 2019 in a single tertiary teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A scoring model was created by bootstrap method in a derivation cohort (2016–2018) and was assessed in a validation cohort (2019).Results: Out of 4223 ERCPs, 2983 and 1240 cases were included in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, 746 cases (top 25%) comprised the high‐dose exposure group, and 2237 cases (bottom 75%) comprised the low‐dose exposure group. Nine clinical parameters associated with high‐dose exposure were male, pancreatic sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation, biliary or pancreatic drainage, procedures with contrast dye, endoscopist, in‐hospital ERCP, and spot image. Stone removal was included by bootstrap analysis. As presented in a nomogram, the weight score of each variable was as follows: male, 1; pancreatic sphincterotomy, 3; balloon dilatation, 7; stone removal, 3; biliary or pancreatic drainage, 5; procedures with contrast dye, 1; endoscopist B, 4; endoscopist C, 5; in‐hospital procedure, 3; and spot image, 3. A total score ≥ 15 suggested a high‐dose radiation exposure. The sensitivity and specificity of the model for high‐dose exposure were 0.562 and 0.813, respectively. In the validation cohort, the model showed reasonable predictability.Conclusions: Various factors were associated with radiation exposure. The simple scoring system in this study could guide endoscopists in predicting the risk of high‐dose radiation exposure.
- Open Access
- 7 January 2022
- Published by The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver in Gut and Liver
- Vol. 16 (5) , 798-805
Real-World Outcomes of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Regimen for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Kwangrok Jung, Jaewoo Park, Jae Hyup Jung, Jong-Chan Lee, Jaihwan Kim, and Jin-Hyeok Hwang. Gut and Liver -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl210346
- 7 January 2022
- Published by The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver in Gut and Liver
- Vol. 16 (5) , 798-805
Open AccessReal-World Outcomes of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Regimen for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Kwangrok Jung, Jaewoo Park, Jae Hyup Jung, Jong-Chan Lee, Jaihwan Kim, and Jin-Hyeok Hwang. Gut and Liver -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl210346