Ashwini Zolekar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Ashwini Zolekar has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Gillespie
Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, UK
1 shared publication - Angelo Antonini
Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
1 shared publication - Connie H. Yan
AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, USA
1 shared publication - Edith A. Nutescu
Department of Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy and Center for Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
1 shared publication - Irene A. Malaty
Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
1 shared publication - James C. Lee
Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurology and Therapy
- Vol. 14 (4) , 1475-1493
Clinical, Humanistic, and Economic Value of ‘Good ON-Time’ in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: A Multinational Real-World Study
Introduction In advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD), ‘ON-time’ indicates periods of better symptom control, with ‘good ON-time (GOT)’ indicating control without troublesome dyskinesia. Despite its importance, the impact of increased ‘GOT’ on aPD outcomes is understudied. This study aims to evaluate the clinical, humanistic, and economic value of incremental hourly increases in ‘GOT’ for people with aPD. Methods The study analyzed data from people with aPD across seven countries, using the Adelphi Parkinson's Disease Specific Program survey (2017–2020). ‘GOT’ (calculated from self-reported ON/OFF-time and the proportion of troublesome dyskinesia time) was normalized to a 16-h day. Outcomes included symptom control, medication use, falls, activities of daily living (ADLs), quality of life (QoL), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Regression models evaluated relationships between incremental ‘GOT’ hours and outcomes. Results Of 802 patients (mean [standard deviation; SD] age, 76.1 [8.9] years; male, 60.3%) included in the analysis, mean (SD) ‘GOT’ was 13.1 (2.7) hours/day. Hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were associated with lower likelihood of reporting uncontrolled motor (odds ratio [OR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.62, 1.01]) and non-motor symptoms (OR 0.88; 95% CI [0.80, 0.96]), taking ≥ 2 PD medication classes (OR 0.91; 95% CI [0.86, 0.97]) and lower fall risk (incidence rate ratio 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.95]). Hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were significantly associated with reduced humanistic burden (greater ADL independence, OR 1.19; 95% CI [1.04 1.37]) and improved QoL (for Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]-39: coefficient − 1.49; 95% CI [− 2.46, − 0.52]) and with reduced economic burden, with annual total HRU cost-savings of $8602.24 (95% CI − $12,192.70 to $5011.77). Conclusions In this multi-country, real-world study of people with aPD, hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were associated with improved clinical outcomes, greater humanistic value, and reduced economic burden. Interventions that maximize improvement of ‘GOT’ should be considered for people with aPD adequately controlled on current therapy.
- 2 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurology and Therapy
- Vol. 14 (4) , 1475-1493
Open AccessClinical, Humanistic, and Economic Value of ‘Good ON-Time’ in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: A Multinational Real-World Study
Introduction In advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD), ‘ON-time’ indicates periods of better symptom control, with ‘good ON-time (GOT)’ indicating control without troublesome dyskinesia. Despite its importance, the impact of increased ‘GOT’ on aPD outcomes is understudied. This study aims to evaluate the clinical, humanistic, and economic value of incremental hourly increases in ‘GOT’ for people with aPD. Methods The study analyzed data from people with aPD across seven countries, using the Adelphi Parkinson's Disease Specific Program survey (2017–2020). ‘GOT’ (calculated from self-reported ON/OFF-time and the proportion of troublesome dyskinesia time) was normalized to a 16-h day. Outcomes included symptom control, medication use, falls, activities of daily living (ADLs), quality of life (QoL), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Regression models evaluated relationships between incremental ‘GOT’ hours and outcomes. Results Of 802 patients (mean [standard deviation; SD] age, 76.1 [8.9] years; male, 60.3%) included in the analysis, mean (SD) ‘GOT’ was 13.1 (2.7) hours/day. Hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were associated with lower likelihood of reporting uncontrolled motor (odds ratio [OR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.62, 1.01]) and non-motor symptoms (OR 0.88; 95% CI [0.80, 0.96]), taking ≥ 2 PD medication classes (OR 0.91; 95% CI [0.86, 0.97]) and lower fall risk (incidence rate ratio 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.95]). Hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were significantly associated with reduced humanistic burden (greater ADL independence, OR 1.19; 95% CI [1.04 1.37]) and improved QoL (for Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]-39: coefficient − 1.49; 95% CI [− 2.46, − 0.52]) and with reduced economic burden, with annual total HRU cost-savings of $8602.24 (95% CI − $12,192.70 to $5011.77). Conclusions In this multi-country, real-world study of people with aPD, hourly increases in ‘GOT’ were associated with improved clinical outcomes, greater humanistic value, and reduced economic burden. Interventions that maximize improvement of ‘GOT’ should be considered for people with aPD adequately controlled on current therapy.
- Open Access
- 10 January 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pharmacogenomics
- Vol. 23 (2) , 85-95
Changing from Mandatory to Optional Genotyping Results in Higher Acceptance of Pharmacist-Guided Warfarin Dosing
Aim: We evaluated the clinical acceptance and feasibility of a pharmacist-guided personalized consult service following its transition from a mandatory (mPGx) to optional (oPGx) CYP2C9/VKORC1/CYP4F...
- 10 January 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pharmacogenomics
- Vol. 23 (2) , 85-95
Open AccessChanging from Mandatory to Optional Genotyping Results in Higher Acceptance of Pharmacist-Guided Warfarin Dosing
Aim: We evaluated the clinical acceptance and feasibility of a pharmacist-guided personalized consult service following its transition from a mandatory (mPGx) to optional (oPGx) CYP2C9/VKORC1/CYP4F...