Xiaoding Hu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xiaoding Hu has a total of 42 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bisrat G. Debeb
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
11 shared publications - Wendy A. Woodward
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
10 shared publications - Debu Tripathy
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
9 shared publications - Naoto T. Ueno
University of Hawaiʻi Cancer Center Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, Honolulu, USA
9 shared publications - Alex W. Tan
Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
8 shared publications - Bora Lim
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
8 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 January 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 28 (5) , 1220-1236
Soluble E-cadherin-CXCL1-CXCR2 axis as a therapeutic vulnerability in inflammatory breast cancer brain metastasis
Background: The brain is a common site of relapse in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an E-cadherin-positive, aggressive form of breast cancer. Elevated serum levels of soluble E-cadherin (sEcad), an 80-kDa fragment, correlated with poorer outcomes and increased brain metastases in patients with metastatic IBC. We hypothesize that sEcad is a driver of brain metastasis in IBC. Methods: Serum sEcad levels from 348 IBC patients were quantified by ELISA. To examine sEcad function, we used recombinant sEcad protein and generated stable IBC cell lines by cloning and overexpressing Flag-tagged sEcad. Control and sEcad-overexpressing MDA-IBC3 and SUM149 cells were injected into SCID/Beige mice to evaluate brain metastasis burden and survival, and a brain-permeable CXCR2 inhibitor was also tested for efficacy in these models. Results: Higher serum sEcad levels correlated with poorer overall survival, earlier metastasis, and increased brain metastasis. In vitro, recombinant sEcad and stable sEcad overexpression in IBC cell lines promoted invasion, resistance to anoikis, and activation of pro-survival NF-κβ signaling. In vivo, mice injected with sEcad-overexpressing IBC cells had increased metastatic burden and reduced overall and brain metastasis-free survival. Further, sEcad induced reactive astrocytosis through the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis, and treatment with a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist reduced metastatic burden and prolonged survival in the brain metastasis models. Conclusion: sEcad drives brain metastasis by promoting invasion and anoikis resistance in cancer cells and inducing an inflammatory brain microenvironment via a targetable CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis. These findings uncover a novel and critical role for sEcad and highlight CXCR2 as a therapeutic target in patients with metastatic IBC.
- 23 January 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 28 (5) , 1220-1236
Open AccessSoluble E-cadherin-CXCL1-CXCR2 axis as a therapeutic vulnerability in inflammatory breast cancer brain metastasis
Background: The brain is a common site of relapse in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an E-cadherin-positive, aggressive form of breast cancer. Elevated serum levels of soluble E-cadherin (sEcad), an 80-kDa fragment, correlated with poorer outcomes and increased brain metastases in patients with metastatic IBC. We hypothesize that sEcad is a driver of brain metastasis in IBC. Methods: Serum sEcad levels from 348 IBC patients were quantified by ELISA. To examine sEcad function, we used recombinant sEcad protein and generated stable IBC cell lines by cloning and overexpressing Flag-tagged sEcad. Control and sEcad-overexpressing MDA-IBC3 and SUM149 cells were injected into SCID/Beige mice to evaluate brain metastasis burden and survival, and a brain-permeable CXCR2 inhibitor was also tested for efficacy in these models. Results: Higher serum sEcad levels correlated with poorer overall survival, earlier metastasis, and increased brain metastasis. In vitro, recombinant sEcad and stable sEcad overexpression in IBC cell lines promoted invasion, resistance to anoikis, and activation of pro-survival NF-κβ signaling. In vivo, mice injected with sEcad-overexpressing IBC cells had increased metastatic burden and reduced overall and brain metastasis-free survival. Further, sEcad induced reactive astrocytosis through the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis, and treatment with a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist reduced metastatic burden and prolonged survival in the brain metastasis models. Conclusion: sEcad drives brain metastasis by promoting invasion and anoikis resistance in cancer cells and inducing an inflammatory brain microenvironment via a targetable CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis. These findings uncover a novel and critical role for sEcad and highlight CXCR2 as a therapeutic target in patients with metastatic IBC.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Materials and Methods from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Supplementary Materials and Methods
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Materials and Methods from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Supplementary Materials and Methods
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S2 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S2 Venn diagram of the number of significant siRNAs identified with a 5% false discovery rate using different normalization methods (Z-score, b-score, and regional scaling) for comparison between untreated and treated samples.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S2 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S2 Venn diagram of the number of significant siRNAs identified with a 5% false discovery rate using different normalization methods (Z-score, b-score, and regional scaling) for comparison between untreated and treated samples.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S4 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S4 Effect of combination of drugs on SUM149-R cells. The clonogenic assay shows a significant dose-dependent decrease in the colony formation capability of SUM149-R cells after treatment with the combination of MEKK inhibitor AZD6244 and MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 at the same time.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S4 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S4 Effect of combination of drugs on SUM149-R cells. The clonogenic assay shows a significant dose-dependent decrease in the colony formation capability of SUM149-R cells after treatment with the combination of MEKK inhibitor AZD6244 and MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 at the same time.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S2 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Table S2 List of top 26 targets identified in the whole-genome siRNA screening.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S2 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Table S2 List of top 26 targets identified in the whole-genome siRNA screening.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S1 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Table S1 Quantitative PCR primers used in the study.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S1 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Table S1 Quantitative PCR primers used in the study.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S3 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S3 CTB assay showing the effect of combination of drugs on SUM149-R cells. The SUM149-R cells showed a decrease in viability after treatment with the constant doses of AZD5991 (0.5, and 1µM) followed by the different doses of AZD6244.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S3 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S3 CTB assay showing the effect of combination of drugs on SUM149-R cells. The SUM149-R cells showed a decrease in viability after treatment with the constant doses of AZD5991 (0.5, and 1µM) followed by the different doses of AZD6244.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S1 Comparative analysis of expression of MDR genes in the parental and resistant cells.
- 2 September 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
Fig. S1 Comparative analysis of expression of MDR genes in the parental and resistant cells.
- Open Access
Soluble E-cadherin Drives Brain Metastasis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Summary: The brain is a common site of relapse in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an E-cadherin positive, aggressive form of breast cancer. We found that elevated serum levels of soluble E-cadherin (sEcad), an 80-kDa fragment of E-cadherin, in patients with metastatic IBC correlated with poorer outcomes and increased rates of brain metastases. In our effort to understand the underlying mechanism, we discovered that sEcad binds to XIAP, an inhibitor of cell death, activating the pro-survival NF-kβ signaling in tumor cells. We also discovered that sEcad affects the tumor cell microenvironment by enhancing cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells and inducing reactive astrocytosis in the brain. In addition, we found that sEcad-mediated reactive astrocytosis relies on the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis and treatment with a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist reduced brain metastatic burden and prolonged survival. These findings implicate sEcad in brain metastasis and provide new insights into potential therapeutic targets for IBC. Graphical Highlights: High serum sEcad levels correlate clinically with poor survival outcomes and development of brain metastasis sEcad drives IBC brain metastasis growth in mouse models sEcad binds XIAP to activate NFkB and promote anoikis resistance and invasion of IBC cells sEcad activates reactive astrocytes and induces CXCR2 expression on tumor cells in vitro and in vivo CXCR2-IN-1, a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist, reduces metastasis and improves survival in IBC brain metastasis models
Open AccessSoluble E-cadherin Drives Brain Metastasis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Summary: The brain is a common site of relapse in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an E-cadherin positive, aggressive form of breast cancer. We found that elevated serum levels of soluble E-cadherin (sEcad), an 80-kDa fragment of E-cadherin, in patients with metastatic IBC correlated with poorer outcomes and increased rates of brain metastases. In our effort to understand the underlying mechanism, we discovered that sEcad binds to XIAP, an inhibitor of cell death, activating the pro-survival NF-kβ signaling in tumor cells. We also discovered that sEcad affects the tumor cell microenvironment by enhancing cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells and inducing reactive astrocytosis in the brain. In addition, we found that sEcad-mediated reactive astrocytosis relies on the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis and treatment with a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist reduced brain metastatic burden and prolonged survival. These findings implicate sEcad in brain metastasis and provide new insights into potential therapeutic targets for IBC. Graphical Highlights: High serum sEcad levels correlate clinically with poor survival outcomes and development of brain metastasis sEcad drives IBC brain metastasis growth in mouse models sEcad binds XIAP to activate NFkB and promote anoikis resistance and invasion of IBC cells sEcad activates reactive astrocytes and induces CXCR2 expression on tumor cells in vitro and in vivo CXCR2-IN-1, a brain-permeable CXCR2 antagonist, reduces metastasis and improves survival in IBC brain metastasis models
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Vol. 24 (9) , 1453-1465
Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
The MAPK pathway can drive resistance in highly aggressive breast cancers. Our previous work showed that the MEK inhibitor (MEKi) AZD6244 (selumetinib) prevented lung metastasis in a breast cancer xenograft model. In clinical studies, MEKis as single agents have had only modest activity against solid tumors due to the onset of resistance. Using synthetic lethality siRNA screening, we identified myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) as a potential contributor to AZD6244 resistance. We hypothesized that MCL-1 promotes MEKi resistance in highly aggressive breast cancers and that MCL-1 inhibition overcomes AZD6244 resistance. We established two AZD6244-resistant cell lines: MDA-MB-231-R (triple-negative breast cancer) and SUM149-R (triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer). These resistant cells were characterized with respect to different parameters, and a combination of an MCL-1 inhibitor (MCL-1i) together with an MEKi was evaluated in vitro and in vivo to overcome the acquired resistance. Compared with their respective parental cells, MDA-MB-231-R and SUM149-R cells showed increased proliferation, colony formation, stemness, anchorage-independent growth, and MCL-1 expression levels. MCL-1 knockdown in resistant cells decreased cell proliferation and colony formation, increased apoptosis, and was associated with high expression of the proapoptotic proteins PUMA, NOXA, BAK, and BAX. MEKi resistance was overcome when resistant cells were treated with MCL-1i and MEKi combined. In an in vivo mouse model, inhibition of MCL-1 restored sensitivity to AZD6244. Our results suggest that MCL-1 is a driver of MEKi resistance and that combining an MCL-1i with an MEKi warrants further investigation in triple-negative and triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer.
- 13 May 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Vol. 24 (9) , 1453-1465
Inhibition of MCL-1 and MEK Overcomes MEK Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative and Inflammatory Breast Cancers
The MAPK pathway can drive resistance in highly aggressive breast cancers. Our previous work showed that the MEK inhibitor (MEKi) AZD6244 (selumetinib) prevented lung metastasis in a breast cancer xenograft model. In clinical studies, MEKis as single agents have had only modest activity against solid tumors due to the onset of resistance. Using synthetic lethality siRNA screening, we identified myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) as a potential contributor to AZD6244 resistance. We hypothesized that MCL-1 promotes MEKi resistance in highly aggressive breast cancers and that MCL-1 inhibition overcomes AZD6244 resistance. We established two AZD6244-resistant cell lines: MDA-MB-231-R (triple-negative breast cancer) and SUM149-R (triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer). These resistant cells were characterized with respect to different parameters, and a combination of an MCL-1 inhibitor (MCL-1i) together with an MEKi was evaluated in vitro and in vivo to overcome the acquired resistance. Compared with their respective parental cells, MDA-MB-231-R and SUM149-R cells showed increased proliferation, colony formation, stemness, anchorage-independent growth, and MCL-1 expression levels. MCL-1 knockdown in resistant cells decreased cell proliferation and colony formation, increased apoptosis, and was associated with high expression of the proapoptotic proteins PUMA, NOXA, BAK, and BAX. MEKi resistance was overcome when resistant cells were treated with MCL-1i and MEKi combined. In an in vivo mouse model, inhibition of MCL-1 restored sensitivity to AZD6244. Our results suggest that MCL-1 is a driver of MEKi resistance and that combining an MCL-1i with an MEKi warrants further investigation in triple-negative and triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer.