Tania Pastor-Bonel

Introducción. El paraganglioma gangliocítico es una entidad histológica infrecuente, siendo el duodeno su principal localización extra ganglionar. Caso clínico. Se trata de un varón de 54 años que consulta por dolor abdominal y hemorragia digestiva alta. Se diagnosticó una lesión sospechosa de ampuloma por lo que se realizó una duodenopancreatectomía cefálica. En el análisis histológico, se confirmó el diagnóstico de paraganglioma gangliocítico metastásico por la presencia patognomónica de tres estirpes celulares (epiteliales, ganglionares y Schwann-like). Dado su buen pronóstico, asociado con baja quimiosensibilidad, no recibió tratamiento adyuvante. Resultados. Durante el seguimiento, el paciente no presentó complicaciones tardías, ni signos de recidiva después de un año de la intervención. Conclusión. El paraganglioma gangliocítico es una entidad potencialmente maligna, que requiere un correcto estudio de extensión y un seguimiento estrecho a largo plazo.

Background There is still controversy over the usefulness of seton placement prior to the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) surgery in the management of anal fistula. Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative seton placement on the outcomes of LIFT surgery for the management of fistula-in-ano. Design systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources A search was performed on the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. Study Selection Original studies without language restriction reporting the primary healing rates with and without seton placement as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery were included. Intervention The intervention assessed was the LIFT with and without prior seton placement. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome was defined as the primary healing rate with and without the use of seton as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery. Results Ten studies met the criteria for systematic review, all retrospective, with a pooled study population of 772 patients. There were no significant differences in the percentages of recurrence between patients with and without seton placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–1.43: p = 0.35). The I² value was 9%, which shows the homogeneity of the results among the analyzed studies. The 10 included studies demonstrated a weighted average overall recurrence of 38% (interquartile range [IQR] 27–42.7%), recurrence with the use of seton was 40% (IQR 26.6–51.2%), and without its use, the recurrence rate was 51.3% (IQR 31.3–51.3%) Limitations The levels of evidence found in the available literature were relatively fair, as indicated after qualitative evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS) evidence levels. Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that the placement of seton as a bridge treatment prior to LIFT surgery does not significantly improve long-term anal fistula healing outcomes. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract surgery can be performed safely and effectively with no previous seton placement. International prospective register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO registration number: CDR42020149173. Received: 28 August 2020 Accepted: 15 January 2021 Publication Date: 19 July 2021 (online) © 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil