Sheng Chen

Background Smoked cannabis is known to have effects on cognitive function. The use of edibles is on the rise yet there are few studies of the effects of edibles on cognitive function. Further, most studies of cannabis used fixed laboratory doses which may not capture some of the nuances of more naturalistic doses. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the psychoactive component of cannabis yet the relationship of blood THC to cognitive performance is unclear. Methods In the present observational study participants (n = 22) were invited to the lab to use their regular legally sourced cannabis edibles. At 150 and 270 min after ingesting the edible, measures of learning and memory (verbal free recall task), executive function (trail making test) and functional vision and visual attention (useful field of view test) were taken. Subjective experiences were also measured, and blood THC was correlated with cognitive outcomes. Results At 150 min after taking a cannabis edible (mean 7.3 ± 2.9 mg of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) decreases were seen in performance on two measures of the verbal free recall. No effects were found on the useful field of view and trail making tests. There were significant increases in subjective experiences as assessed with a visual analog scale and the Addiction Research Centre Inventory; some changes were also seen on the Profile of Mood States. Blood THC was not correlated with any cognitive outcomes. Conclusions In sum, the present results suggest that people who choose to use relatively low doses of cannabis edibles may experience decrements in cognitive function while experiencing intoxication.

Recent policy recommendations on the use of health data call for an understanding of privacy experiences and perspectives. A secondary analysis of a national survey was conducted to characterize public experiences views on digital health (n=2010). This study found that 69.8% of participants are unaware of health privacy laws yet 71.8% were confident in protecting their online privacy. These variables were significantly associated with beliefs that their privacy was adequately protected. This study reinforces the discourse that public engagement in building awareness of the law and confidence in data protection will be critical in fostering trust in health privacy safeguards.

Background: As an established treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is now implemented and assessed in internet-based formats that, when combined with smartphone apps, enable secure text messaging. As an adjunct to such internet-based CBT (ICBT) approaches, text messaging has been associated with increased adherence and therapeutic alliance. Objective: This study analyzed data from the intervention arm of a randomized control trial evaluating 24-week ICBT for MDD (intervention arm) against standard-care psychiatry (waitlist control). The aim of this secondary analysis was to assess MDD symptom improvement in relation to the frequency and content of text messages sent by ICBT participants to Navigator-Coaches during randomized control trial participation. Higher text frequency in general and in 3 conceptual categories (appreciating alliance, alliance building disclosures, and agreement confirmation) was hypothesized to predict larger MDD symptom improvement. Methods: Participants were young adults (18-30 years) from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. The frequencies of categorized texts from 20 ICBT completers were analyzed with respect to MDD symptom improvement using linear regression models. Texts were coded by 2 independent coders and categorized using content analysis. MDD symptoms were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Results: Participants sent an average of 136 text messages. Analyses indicated that BDI-II improvement was negatively associated with text messaging frequency in general (β=–0.029, 95% CI –0.11 to 0.048) and in each of the 3 categories: appreciating alliance (β=–0.096, 95% CI –0.80 to 0.61), alliance building disclosures (β=–0.098, 95% CI –0.28 to 0.084), and agreement confirmation (β=–0.076, 95% CI –0.40 to 0.25). Altogether, the effect of text messaging on BDI-II improvement was uniformly negative across statistical models. More text messaging appeared associated with less MDD symptom improvement. Conclusions: The hypothesized positive associations between conceptually categorized text messages and MDD symptom improvement were not supported in this study. Instead, more text messaging appeared to indicate less treatment benefit. Future studies with larger samples are needed to discern the optimal use of text messaging in ICBT approaches using adjunctive modes of communication. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT03406052; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406052

Background: Patient portals are web-based systems through which patients can access their personal health information and communicate with their clinicians. The integration of patient portals into mental health care settings has been evolving over the past decade, as cumulated research to date has highlighted the potential role of portals in facilitating positive health outcomes. However, it is currently unknown whether portal use can foster interprofessional collaboration between clinicians and patients or whether the portal is a tool to support an already established collaborative relationship. Objective: This mixed methods study aimed to understand how the use of a patient portal within mental health settings can impact the level of interprofessional collaboration between clinicians and patients. Methods: This study was conducted in a large mental health care organization in Ontario, Canada. A convergent mixed methods design was used, where the primary data collection methods included questionnaires and semistructured interviews with patients who had experience using a portal for their mental health care. For the quantitative strand, participants completed the Health Care Communication Questionnaire and the Self-Empowerment subscale of the Mental Health Recovery Measure at 3 time points (baseline, 3 months of use, and 6 months of use) to measure changes in scores over time. For the qualitative strand, semistructured interviews were conducted at the 3-month time point to assess the elements of interprofessional collaboration associated with the portal. Results: For the quantitative strand, 113 participants completed the questionnaire. For the Health Care Communication Questionnaire scores, the raw means of the total scores at the 3 time points were as follows: baseline, 43.01 (SD 7.28); three months, 43.19 (SD 6.65); and 6 months, 42.74 (SD 6.84). In the univariate model with time as the only independent variable, the scores did not differ significantly across the 3 time points (P=.70). For the Mental Health Recovery Measure scores, the raw mean total scores at the 3 time points were as follows: baseline, 10.77 (SD 3.63); three months, 11.09 (SD 3.81); and 6 months, 11.10 (SD 3.33). In the univariate model with time as the only independent variable, the scores did not differ significantly across the 3 time points (P=.34). For the qualitative strand, 10 participants were interviewed and identified various elements of how interprofessional collaboration can be supplemented through the use of a patient portal, including improved team functioning, communication, and conflict resolution. Conclusions: Although the quantitative data produced nonsignificant findings in interprofessional collaboration scores over time, the patients’ narrative accounts described how the portal can support various interprofessional collaboration concepts, such as communication, leadership, and conflict resolution. This provides useful information for clinicians to support the interprofessional relationship when using a portal within a mental health setting. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025508

Aim: An emerging body of research is identifying effective outpatient integrated treatment approaches for youth with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, though few studies exist examining inpatient treatment. The current study aimed to address this gap by examining response to treatment during admission to, and in the year following discharge from, a specialized inpatient program for youth with co-occurring disorders.Methods: A single-cohort longitudinal design examined change in adaptive functioning, mental health symptoms, and substance use frequency among N = 142 youth (69.1% female) aged 14-21 (M = 16.9, SD = 1.5) attending the program. Participants completed self-report measures at admission, discharge, and 1-, 6- and 12-months post-discharge.Results: Analyses indicated significant improvements in adaptive functioning, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and substance use frequency during admission. There was some loss of gains in adaptive functioning over the 12-months post-discharge. Improvements were maintained in internalizing symptoms and substance use frequency, and improvements in externalizing symptoms continued over the 12-months post-discharge. There was no significant interaction between change in functioning and internalizing symptoms at admission or type of substance use disorder diagnosis. There was a significant interaction with externalizing symptoms, such that those with clinically significant levels of externalizing symptoms at admission experienced greater improvement in functioning, though the groups ended treatment with comparable functioning scores.Conclusions: The results provide preliminary support for integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders delivered in an inpatient setting. However, the results also reflect the significant needs of youth with co-occurring disorders and the importance of ongoing care post-discharge from intensive treatment settings.

Objective: This study aimed to provide a general overview of mental health randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and summarize the temporal trends in terms of the number of studies, median sample sizes, and median effect sizes using data collected from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Methods: Using data collected from the CDSR, the temporal trends are compared in terms of the number of studies, median sample sizes, and median effect sizes between two broad categories of interventions: pharmacological RCT (ph-RCT) and non-pharmacological RCT (nph-RCT), and in conjunction with major mental disorder categories. Results: Chronologically, the number of mental health RCTs reported in publications has increased exponentially from 1955 to 2020. While ph-RCT comprised a majority of mental health RCTs in the earlier years, the proportion of nph-RCTs increased more quickly over time and markedly exceeded ph-RCT after 2010. The median sample size for all 6,652 mental health RCTs was 61, with 61 for ph-RCT and 60 for nph-RCT. Over time, the median fluctuated but an increasing trend was observed over the past 60+ years. The median of the effect size, measured by Pearson's r, for overall RCTs was 0.18, and nph-RCT (0.19) had a larger median effect size compared to ph-RCT (0.16). Over the years, the nph-RCT had a larger median effect size than the ph-RCT. Differences in the median effect sizes among the categories of mental disorders were also noted. Schizophrenia had the most RCTs, with a median Pearson's r value of 0.17. Mood disorder had the second largest number of RCTs and a median Pearson's r value of 0.15. Neurotic/stress-related mental disorder had the third largest number of RCTs with the highest median Pearson's r being 0.23. Conclusions: This study provides meaningful information and filled the knowledge gap in mental health RCTs.

BACKGROUND Patient portals are web-based systems through which patients can access their personal health information and communicate with their clinicians. The integration of patient portals into mental health care settings has been evolving over the past decade, as cumulated research to date has highlighted the potential role of portals in facilitating positive health outcomes. However, it is currently unknown whether portal use can foster interprofessional collaboration between clinicians and patients or whether the portal is a tool to support an already established collaborative relationship. OBJECTIVE This mixed methods study aimed to understand how the use of a patient portal within mental health settings can impact the level of interprofessional collaboration between clinicians and patients. METHODS This study was conducted in a large mental health care organization in Ontario, Canada. A convergent mixed methods design was used, where the primary data collection methods included questionnaires and semistructured interviews with patients who had experience using a portal for their mental health care. For the quantitative strand, participants completed the Health Care Communication Questionnaire and the Self-Empowerment subscale of the Mental Health Recovery Measure at 3 time points (baseline, 3 months of use, and 6 months of use) to measure changes in scores over time. For the qualitative strand, semistructured interviews were conducted at the 3-month time point to assess the elements of interprofessional collaboration associated with the portal. RESULTS For the quantitative strand, 113 participants completed the questionnaire. For the Health Care Communication Questionnaire scores, the raw means of the total scores at the 3 time points were as follows: baseline, 43.01 (SD 7.28); three months, 43.19 (SD 6.65); and 6 months, 42.74 (SD 6.84). In the univariate model with time as the only independent variable, the scores did not differ significantly across the 3 time points (P=.70). For the Mental Health Recovery Measure scores, the raw mean total scores at the 3 time points were as follows: baseline, 10.77 (SD 3.63); three months, 11.09 (SD 3.81); and 6 months, 11.10 (SD 3.33). In the univariate model with time as the only independent variable, the scores did not differ significantly across the 3 time points (P=.34). For the qualitative strand, 10 participants were interviewed and identified various elements of how interprofessional collaboration can be supplemented through the use of a patient portal, including improved team functioning, communication, and conflict resolution. CONCLUSIONS Although the quantitative data produced nonsignificant findings in interprofessional collaboration scores over time, the patients’ narrative accounts described how the portal can support various interprofessional collaboration concepts, such as communication, leadership, and conflict resolution. This provides useful information for clinicians to support the interprofessional relationship when using a portal within a mental health setting. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025508

BACKGROUND As an established treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is now implemented and assessed in internet-based formats that, when combined with smartphone apps, enable secure text messaging. As an adjunct to such internet-based CBT (ICBT) approaches, text messaging has been associated with increased adherence and therapeutic alliance. OBJECTIVE This study analyzed data from the intervention arm of a randomized control trial evaluating 24-week ICBT for MDD (intervention arm) against standard-care psychiatry (waitlist control). The aim of this secondary analysis was to assess MDD symptom improvement in relation to the frequency and content of text messages sent by ICBT participants to Navigator-Coaches during randomized control trial participation. Higher text frequency in general and in 3 conceptual categories (appreciating alliance, alliance building disclosures, and agreement confirmation) was hypothesized to predict larger MDD symptom improvement. METHODS Participants were young adults (18-30 years) from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. The frequencies of categorized texts from 20 ICBT completers were analyzed with respect to MDD symptom improvement using linear regression models. Texts were coded by 2 independent coders and categorized using content analysis. MDD symptoms were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). RESULTS Participants sent an average of 136 text messages. Analyses indicated that BDI-II improvement was negatively associated with text messaging frequency in general (β=–0.029, 95% CI –0.11 to 0.048) and in each of the 3 categories: appreciating alliance (β=–0.096, 95% CI –0.80 to 0.61), alliance building disclosures (β=–0.098, 95% CI –0.28 to 0.084), and agreement confirmation (β=–0.076, 95% CI –0.40 to 0.25). Altogether, the effect of text messaging on BDI-II improvement was uniformly negative across statistical models. More text messaging appeared associated with less MDD symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS The hypothesized positive associations between conceptually categorized text messages and MDD symptom improvement were not supported in this study. Instead, more text messaging appeared to indicate less treatment benefit. Future studies with larger samples are needed to discern the optimal use of text messaging in ICBT approaches using adjunctive modes of communication. CLINICALTRIAL Clinical Trials.gov NCT03406052; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406052

Background: Canadians are increasingly gaining web-based access to digital health services, and they expect to access their data from these services through a central patient access channel. Implementing data sharing between these services will require patient trust that is fostered through meaningful consent and consent management. Understanding user consent requirements and information needs is necessary for developing a trustworthy and transparent consent management system. Objective: The objective of this study is to explore consent management preferences and information needs to support meaningful consent. Methods: A secondary analysis of a national survey was conducted using a retrospective descriptive study design. The 2019 cross-sectional survey used a series of vignettes and consent scenarios to explore Canadians’ privacy perspectives and preferences regarding consent management. Nonparametric tests and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the differences and associations between various factors. Results: Of the 1017 total responses, 716 (70.4%) participants self-identified as potential users. Of the potential users, almost all (672/716, 93.8%) felt that the ability to control their data was important, whereas some (385/716, 53.8%) believed that an all or none control at the data source level was adequate. Most potential users preferred new data sources to be accessible by health care providers (546/716, 76.3%) and delegated parties (389/716, 54.3%) by default. Prior digital health use was associated with greater odds of granting default access when compared with no prior use, with the greatest odds of granting default access to digital health service providers (odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.36-3.46). From a list of 9 information elements found in consent forms, potential users selected an average of 5.64 (SD 2.68) and 5.54 (SD 2.85) items to feel informed in consenting to data access by care partners and commercial digital health service providers, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of items selected between the 2 scenarios (P>.05); however, there were significant differences (P<.05) in information types that were selected between the scenarios. Conclusions: A majority of survey participants reported that they would register and use a patient access channel and believed that the ability to control data access was important, especially as it pertains to access by those outside their care. These findings suggest that a broad all or none approach based on data source may be accepted; however, approximately one-fifth of potential users were unable to decide. Although vignettes were used to introduce the questions, this study showed that more context is required for potential users to make informed consent decisions. Understanding their information needs will be critical, as these needs vary with the use case, highlighting the importance of prioritizing and tailoring information to enable meaningful consent.