Martin Brand
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Martin Brand has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Eduard Jonas
Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
2 shared publications - A Chikobvu
Gauteng Department of Health
1 shared publication - Chikwendu J. Ede
Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwaneth Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 1864, South Africa
1 shared publication - Deon Nel
University of Cape Town
1 shared publication - J. Ramos
University of Pretoria
1 shared publication - John-Edwin Thomson
University of Witwatersrand, Surgery, Johannesburg, South Africa
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2026
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 76-80
Treatment-time guarantees for endoscopy services in Gauteng Province, South Africa: access, performance, and administrative value
- 1 September 2026
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 76-80
Treatment-time guarantees for endoscopy services in Gauteng Province, South Africa: access, performance, and administrative value
- 1 September 2024
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 62 (3) , 242-248
Procedures most frequently performed by South African-trained general surgeons – implications for training and assessment
Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is being introduced across postgraduate training in South Africa. This study was undertaken to inform the selection of the core procedures for WBA, by determining the most frequently performed procedures in general surgery practice. These findings may also assist academic centres undertaking curriculum review to determine whether or not they are training surgeons who are competent to meet the current local needs of society. This study was a cross-sectional observational study using a self-administered survey. General surgeons who passed the final fellowship examinations of the College of Surgeons of South Africa between 2017-2022, working in fulltime specialist practice, were eligible for participation. The study included 111 surgeons of which the majority (53%) were working full time in government practice, 23% were in private practice and 24% were in a combination of both government and private practice. The 10 most frequently listed procedures were - hernia repair (95%), appendicectomy (91%), emergency laparotomy (88%), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (80%), gastroscopy (80%), colonoscopy (61%), colectomy (55%), lower limb amputation (48%), mastectomy (40%) and intestinal stoma formation (31%). Fifty-seven (51%) participants reported that they felt prepared to independently perform the full range of most frequently listed procedures. Of the 49% who reported feeling unprepared for one or more procedures on completion of training, the most frequently listed procedure was colonoscopy. This study identified a list of procedures that may be considered as core procedural activities for WBA of South African general surgery trainees.
- 1 September 2024
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 62 (3) , 242-248
Procedures most frequently performed by South African-trained general surgeons – implications for training and assessment
Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is being introduced across postgraduate training in South Africa. This study was undertaken to inform the selection of the core procedures for WBA, by determining the most frequently performed procedures in general surgery practice. These findings may also assist academic centres undertaking curriculum review to determine whether or not they are training surgeons who are competent to meet the current local needs of society. This study was a cross-sectional observational study using a self-administered survey. General surgeons who passed the final fellowship examinations of the College of Surgeons of South Africa between 2017-2022, working in fulltime specialist practice, were eligible for participation. The study included 111 surgeons of which the majority (53%) were working full time in government practice, 23% were in private practice and 24% were in a combination of both government and private practice. The 10 most frequently listed procedures were - hernia repair (95%), appendicectomy (91%), emergency laparotomy (88%), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (80%), gastroscopy (80%), colonoscopy (61%), colectomy (55%), lower limb amputation (48%), mastectomy (40%) and intestinal stoma formation (31%). Fifty-seven (51%) participants reported that they felt prepared to independently perform the full range of most frequently listed procedures. Of the 49% who reported feeling unprepared for one or more procedures on completion of training, the most frequently listed procedure was colonoscopy. This study identified a list of procedures that may be considered as core procedural activities for WBA of South African general surgery trainees.
- 1 September 2023
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 61 (3) , 204-206
Early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- 1 September 2023
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 61 (3) , 204-206
Early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- Open Access
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 59 (1) , 2-6
Colorectal cancer liver metastases : management and five-year survival in a South African patient cohort
Background: Approximately 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will be diagnosed with CRC liver metastases (CRCLM) during the course of their disease. No data regarding CRCLM presentation, management and survival outcomeshas been published from either the private or public health care sectors in South Africa. This study aimed to address this deficit, reporting on a private sector cohort. Methods: A retrospective review of a private health care funder's database from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2015 was performed. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify CRC and CRCLM. Procedure codes assigned to hospital admissions were used to identify the type of surgical treatment. Chemotherapy was identified by the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system of medicines. Treatment patterns were assessed and five-year overall survival(OS) was calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional-hazards regression was used for between group survival comparisons. Results: Six hundred and one (601) of 3 412 patients presenting with CRC (17.6%) were diagnosed with CRCLM at presentation or during the follow-up period. Sixty patients with CRCLM (10.0%) underwent resection of the primary CRC and liver resection for metastases, 281 (46.8%) underwent CRC resection only, 180 (30%) received chemotherapy only, and 47 (7.8%) received no treatment. Five-year OS for these groups were 57.3%, 15.6%, 9.8% and 0% respectively. Conclusion: Five-year OS of the various CRCLM treatment pathways in a South African private sector population compares to results published in international series. However, a smaller proportion of patients with CRCLM underwent liver resection, compared to international studies.
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Medpharm Publications in South African Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 59 (1) , 2-6
Open AccessColorectal cancer liver metastases : management and five-year survival in a South African patient cohort
Background: Approximately 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will be diagnosed with CRC liver metastases (CRCLM) during the course of their disease. No data regarding CRCLM presentation, management and survival outcomeshas been published from either the private or public health care sectors in South Africa. This study aimed to address this deficit, reporting on a private sector cohort. Methods: A retrospective review of a private health care funder's database from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2015 was performed. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify CRC and CRCLM. Procedure codes assigned to hospital admissions were used to identify the type of surgical treatment. Chemotherapy was identified by the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system of medicines. Treatment patterns were assessed and five-year overall survival(OS) was calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional-hazards regression was used for between group survival comparisons. Results: Six hundred and one (601) of 3 412 patients presenting with CRC (17.6%) were diagnosed with CRCLM at presentation or during the follow-up period. Sixty patients with CRCLM (10.0%) underwent resection of the primary CRC and liver resection for metastases, 281 (46.8%) underwent CRC resection only, 180 (30%) received chemotherapy only, and 47 (7.8%) received no treatment. Five-year OS for these groups were 57.3%, 15.6%, 9.8% and 0% respectively. Conclusion: Five-year OS of the various CRCLM treatment pathways in a South African private sector population compares to results published in international series. However, a smaller proportion of patients with CRCLM underwent liver resection, compared to international studies.
- Open Access
- 7 November 2019
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2019 (11)
Selective versus non-selective shunts for the prevention of variceal rebleeding
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of any type of selective shunt versus any type of non‐selective shunt for the prevention of oesophagogastric variceal rebleeding in people with portal hypertension.
- 7 November 2019
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2019 (11)
Open AccessSelective versus non-selective shunts for the prevention of variceal rebleeding
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of any type of selective shunt versus any type of non‐selective shunt for the prevention of oesophagogastric variceal rebleeding in people with portal hypertension.