Lamees A. Altamimi

Introduction Hand rejuvenation addresses aging-related changes such as subcutaneous fat loss, skin degradation, and photodamage. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) has emerged as a promising treatment, offering durable volume augmentation and regenerative effects. This study aims to systematically review the evidence on the techniques, outcomes, and complications of AFT for hand rejuvenation. Methods A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as MEDLINE, SCOPUS, DOAJ, and PUBMED from inception to April 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting on hand rejuvenation using fat grafting, including randomized clinical trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers blindly. Results Eleven studies published between 2001 and 2019 were included, comprising 303 patients with a strong female predominance. Study designs varied, with three randomized clinical trials, seven case series, and one prospective study. High satisfaction rates were consistently reported, with complications being generally infrequent and minor. Various fat grafting techniques were employed, with manual aspiration being the predominant fat harvesting method. Follow-up periods ranged from 5 to 38 months, facilitating thorough evaluation of treatment outcomes. Conclusion AFT for hand rejuvenation is effective and safe, offering high patient satisfaction and minimal complications. Long-term fat retention and regenerative effects of adipose-derived stem cells contribute to success. However, fat graft resorption may require multiple treatments. Future research should standardize assessment tools, volumetrically measure graft resorption, and conduct high-quality trials to optimize protocols. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Patient satisfaction with healthcare was recognized as an indispensable component of healthcare quality assurance programs for decades. Limited research has explored psychosocial variables impacting patient satisfaction with cancer care. The objective of our study was to identify the level of patient satisfaction with cancer care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and determine the psychosocial and clinical predictors of patient satisfaction. A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in 2018–2019 with patients with cancer at the Outpatient Oncology Clinic at King Saud University Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire contained a visual analog scale (VAS) of satisfaction with cancer care, a VAS of satisfaction with social support, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression scale, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. Out of the 400 patients approached, 280 agreed to participate in the study. Of the 280 patients participating in the study, 65% were satisfied with cancer care. Higher satisfaction was associated with being non-Saudi, being employed, having fewer household residents (≤4), being satisfied with social support, not receiving radiotherapy, and receiving hormonal or biological therapy. Having anxiety or depression was also associated with lower satisfaction. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, being satisfied with social support, having ≤ 4 household residents, receiving hormonal therapy, and receiving biological therapy rather than radiotherapy were all independent predictors of higher satisfaction with cancer care. This study found an inadequate level of patient satisfaction with cancer care. Higher levels of satisfaction were associated with being satisfied with social support, using biological and hormonal therapy, while lower satisfaction was associated with a larger number of household residents (>4), depression, anxiety and using radiotherapy.