Raja Chiky
Research Subjects
Raja Chiky has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Maurras Ulbricht Togbe
ISEP - Institut Supérieur d’Électronique de Paris
2 shared publications - Yousra Chabchoub
ISEP - Institut Supérieur d’Électronique de Paris
2 shared publications Aliou Boly
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques(FST)/Département Mathématiques et Informatique, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, BP5005Dakar-Fann, Sénégal
1 shared publication- Aliou Boly
Cheikh Anta Diop University
1 shared publication - Arthur Vervaet
DS OUTSCALE, Saint-Cloud, France
1 shared publication - Mar Callau-Zori
DS OUTSCALE, 1 rue Royale
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 3 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Knowledge and Information Systems
- Vol. 66 (2) , 1231-1255
Online log parsing using evolving research tree
- 3 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Knowledge and Information Systems
- Vol. 66 (2) , 1231-1255
Online log parsing using evolving research tree
- 21 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 700-712
Distributed Anomalies Detection Using Isolation Forest and Spark
- 21 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 700-712
Distributed Anomalies Detection Using Isolation Forest and Spark
- Open Access
- 20 January 2022
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 10, 10219-10237
An In-Depth Study and Improvement of Isolation Forest
Historically, anomalies detection was an important issue for industrial applications such as the detection of a manufacturing failure or defect. It is still a current topic that tries to meet the ever increasing demand in different fields such as intrusion detection, fraud detection, ecosystem change detection or event detection in sensor networks. That’s why anomalies detection remains a research topic of great interest for various research communities. In this paper, we focused on Isolation Forest (IForest), a well known, efficient anomalies detection algorithm. We provided a deep and complete view on IForest. We evaluated the impact of its input parameters (number of trees, sample size and decision threshold) on the efficiency of the detection and on the execution time. We discussed the benefit of including some anomalies into the training phase. To address the limits of IForest, we performed different experiments on commonly used real datasets and also on synthetic datasets with non trivial distributions. We designed multidimensional datasets where anomalies are carried by several dimensions simultaneously. Moreover, we used a varying density and distance between anomalies and normal data, for a variable similarity between these two data classes. We compared the performance of IForest against its improved version called Extended IForest. Finally, we designed and validated a new extension of IForest, based on the different individual trees decisions instead of a global forest decision that we call Majority Voting IForest (MVIForest). The experiments show that MVIForest has a shorter execution time than IForest, with almost the same accuracy.
- 20 January 2022
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 10, 10219-10237
Open AccessAn In-Depth Study and Improvement of Isolation Forest
Historically, anomalies detection was an important issue for industrial applications such as the detection of a manufacturing failure or defect. It is still a current topic that tries to meet the ever increasing demand in different fields such as intrusion detection, fraud detection, ecosystem change detection or event detection in sensor networks. That’s why anomalies detection remains a research topic of great interest for various research communities. In this paper, we focused on Isolation Forest (IForest), a well known, efficient anomalies detection algorithm. We provided a deep and complete view on IForest. We evaluated the impact of its input parameters (number of trees, sample size and decision threshold) on the efficiency of the detection and on the execution time. We discussed the benefit of including some anomalies into the training phase. To address the limits of IForest, we performed different experiments on commonly used real datasets and also on synthetic datasets with non trivial distributions. We designed multidimensional datasets where anomalies are carried by several dimensions simultaneously. Moreover, we used a varying density and distance between anomalies and normal data, for a variable similarity between these two data classes. We compared the performance of IForest against its improved version called Extended IForest. Finally, we designed and validated a new extension of IForest, based on the different individual trees decisions instead of a global forest decision that we call Majority Voting IForest (MVIForest). The experiments show that MVIForest has a shorter execution time than IForest, with almost the same accuracy.