Yasushi Maeda

Fouling, particularly from organic fouling and biofouling, poses a significant challenge in the RO/NF treatment of marginal waters, especially wastewater. Part 1 of this review detailed LMWOC fouling mechanisms. Part 2 focuses on countermeasures and applications. Effective fouling prevention relies on pretreatment, early detection, cleaning, optimized operation, and in situ membrane modification. Accurate fouling prediction is crucial. Preliminary tests using flat-sheet membranes or small-diameter modules are recommended. Currently, no specific fouling index exists for LMWOC fouling. Hydrophobic membranes, such as polyamide, are proposed as alternatives to the standard silt density index (SDI) filter. Once LMWOC fouling potential is assessed, suitable pretreatment methods can be implemented. These include adsorbents, specialized water filters, oxidative decomposition, and antifoulants. In situations where pretreatment is impractical, alternative strategies like high pH operation might be considered. Membrane cleaning becomes necessary upon fouling; however, standard cleaning often fails to fully restore the original flow. Specialized CIP chemicals, including organic solvent-based and oxidative agents, are required. Conversely, LMWOC fouling typically leads to a stabilized flow rate reduction rather than a continuous decline. Aggressive cleaning may be avoided if the resulting operating pressure increase is acceptable. When a significant flow rate drop occurs and LMWOC fouling is suspected, analysis of the fouled membrane is necessary for identification. Standard FT-IR often fails to detect LMWOCs. Solvent extraction followed by GC-MS is required. Pyrolysis GC-MS, which eliminates the extraction step, shows promise. The review concludes by examining how LMWOCs can be strategically utilized to enhance membrane rejection and restore deteriorated membranes.

Fouling, particularly from biofouling, organic and colloidal fouling, and scale formation, presents a significant challenge in RO/NF treatment of marginal waters. The previous review (Part 1) shed light on fouling behavior by LMWOCs and its underlying mechanisms. Part 2 outlines countermeasures to solve this problem and applications utilizing the LMWOCs. Key preventive strategies include pretreatment, early detection, cleaning, optimized operation procedures, and in-situ membrane modification. Correctly predicting the extent of fouling is essential as a first step. Flat-sheet membranes or small-diameter modules can be used for a preliminary test. Long-term testing is not necessary to elucidate the extent of LMWOC fouling; typically, 3 to 4 days is sufficient. So far, no fouling index applicable to LMWCO fouling exists. For this purpose, hydrophobic membranes such as polyamide are proposed instead of the standard silt density index (SDI) filter. Once the extent of LMWOC fouling is evaluated, a suitable pretreatment method can be selected, including adsorbents, specialty water filters, oxidative decomposition, and antifoulants. When no appropriate pretreatment is viable, alternative approaches such as high pH operation may be considered. Cleaning is necessary when membranes are fouled. However, regular cleaning often does not restore the original flow. Thus, special CIP chemicals, such as organic solvent-based and oxidative cleaning agents, are required. On the other hand, although fouling due to LMWCO initially reduces the flow rate, it usually reaches a steady value. Therefore, if the accompanying operating pressure increase can be tolerated, there is no need to restore the initial performance with strong cleaning chemicals. When a significant drop in flow rate occurs and LMWOC fouling is suspected, the cause can be identified by analyzing the fouled membranes. However, LMWCOs cannot often be identified by regular FT-IR analysis. In this case, the membrane is subjected to solvent extraction and then analyzed by GC-MS. Pyrolysis GC-MS, which does not require extraction, seems to be a promising technique. The review concludes by examining how LMWOCs can be strategically utilized to enhance membrane rejection and restore deteriorated membranes.

Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are ubiquitous technologies in modern water treatment, finding applications across various sectors. However, the availability of high-quality water suitable for RO/NF feed is diminishing due to droughts caused by global warming, increasing demand, and water pollution. As concerns grow over the depletion of precious freshwater resources, a global movement is gaining momentum to utilize previously overlooked or challenging water sources, collectively known as “marginal water”. Fouling is a serious concern when treating marginal water. In RO/NF, biofouling, organic and colloidal fouling, and scaling are particularly problematic. Of these, organic fouling, along with biofouling, has been considered difficult to manage. The major organic foulants studied are natural organic matter (NOM) for surface water and groundwater and effluent organic matter (EfOM) for municipal wastewater reuse. Polymeric substances such as sodium alginate, humic acid, and proteins have been used as model substances of EfOM. Fouling by low molecular weight organic compounds (LMWOCs) such as surfactants, phenolics, and plasticizers is known, but there have been few comprehensive reports. This review aims to shed light on fouling behavior by LMWOCs and its mechanism. LMWOC foulants reported so far are summarized, and the role of LMWOCs is also outlined for other polymeric membranes, e.g., UF, gas separation membranes, etc. Regarding the mechanism of fouling, it is explained that the fouling is caused by the strong interaction between LMWOC and the membrane, which causes the water permeation to be hindered by LMWOCs adsorbed on the membrane surface (surface fouling) and sorbed inside the membrane pores (internal fouling). Adsorption amounts and flow loss caused by the LMWOC fouling were well correlated with the octanol-water partition coefficient (log P). In part 2, countermeasures to solve this problem and applications using the LMWOCs will be outlined.

Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are ubiquitous technologies in modern water treatment, finding applications across various sectors. However, the availability of high-quality water suitable for RO/NF feed is diminishing due to droughts caused by global warming, increasing demand, and water pollution. As concerns grow over the depletion of precious freshwater resources, a global movement is gaining momentum to utilize previously overlooked or challenging water sources, collectively known as “marginal water.” Fouling is a serious concern when treating marginal water. In RO/NF, biofouling, organic and colloidal fouling, and scaling are particularly problematic. Of these, organic fouling, along with biofouling, has been considered difficult to manage. The major organic foulants studied are natural organic matter (NOM) for surface water and groundwater and effluent organic matter (EfOM) for municipal wastewater reuse. Polymeric substances such as sodium alginate, humic acid, and proteins have been used as model substances of EfOM. Fouling by low molecular weight organic compounds (LMWOCs) such as surfactants, phenolics, and plasticizers is known, but there have been few comprehensive reports. This review aims to shed light on fouling behavior by LMWOCs and its mechanism. LMWOC foulants reported so far are summarized, and the role of LMWOCs is also outlined for other polymeric membranes, e.g., UF, gas separation membranes, etc. Regarding the mechanism of fouling, it is explained that the fouling is caused by the strong interaction between LMWOC and the membrane, which causes the water permeation to be hindered by LMWOCs adsorbed on the membrane surface (surface fouling) and sorbed inside the membrane pores (internal fouling). Adsorption amounts and flow loss caused by the LMWOC fouling were well correlated with the octanol-water partition coefficient (log P). In part 2, countermeasures to solve this problem and applications using the LMWOCs will be outlined.

More than 60 years have passed since UCLA first announced the development of an innovative asymmetric cellulose acetate reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in 1960. This innovation opened a gate to use RO for commercial use. RO is now ubiquitous in water treatment and has been used for various applications, including seawater desalination, municipal water treatment, wastewater reuse, ultra-pure water (UPW) production, and industrial process waters, etc. RO is a highly integrated system consisting of a series of unit processes: (1) intake system, (2) pretreatment, (3) RO system, (4) post-treatment, and (5) effluent treatment and discharge system. In each step, a variety of chemicals are used. Among those, sulfites (sodium bisulfite and sodium metabisulfite) have played significant roles in RO, such as dechlorination, preservatives, shock treatment, and sanitization, etc. Sulfites especially became necessary as dechlorinating agents because polyamide hollow-fiber and aromatic thin-film composite RO membranes developed in the late 1960s and 1970s were less tolerable with residual chlorine. In this review, key applications of sulfites are explained in detail. Furthermore, as it is reported that sulfites have some adverse effects on RO membranes and processes, such phenomena will be clarified. In particular, the following two are significant concerns using sulfites: RO membrane oxidation catalyzed by heavy metals and a trigger of biofouling. This review sheds light on the mechanism of membrane oxidation and triggering biofouling by sulfites. Some countermeasures are also introduced to alleviate such problems.