Muhammad A. Jawad

Introduction The increase in obesity prevalence and longer life expectancy has led to more candidates over 60 pursuing bariatric surgery. While multiple studies have investigated outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in this age group, the outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) require further investigation. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of DS in patients over 60 compared to those under 60. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for patients from two tertiary referral centers who underwent either biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve from January 2008 to December 2023. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect of age on outcomes, with 51 patients over 60 in group 1 (G1) compared to 153 patients under 60 in group 2 (G2). Results At 24 months (follow-up rate of 61% in G1 and 25.5% in G2), G1 had a mean total body weight loss of 41% vs. 35% for G2 (p = 0.437) and mean excess BMI loss of 78% vs. 69% (p = 0.122). G1 had higher complication > 30-day rates (33.3% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.002), reinterventions (19.6% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.030), reoperations (29.4% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.011), and readmissions > 30 days (39% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.003). Most reoperations in G1 were for ventral hernias (46.7%), while in G2, 28.6% were revisions/conversions. Long-term mortality occurred only in G1 (7.8% vs. 0%, p ≤ 0.001), with causes unrelated to bariatric surgery. Conclusion DS procedures offer comparable weight loss for older patients but have higher complication rates, warranting careful consideration and follow-up.

Background: The current design of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) and single anastomosis duodenal–ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) emphasizes the importance of the pylorus’ preservation to reduce the incidence of marginal ulcer (MU) and dumping. However, no institutional studies have yet reported data on their prevalence. We aimed to assess the incidence of MU and dumping after duodenal switch (DS) and identify the associative factors. Methods: A multi-center review of patients who underwent BPD/DS or SADI-S between 2008 and 2022. Baseline demographics, symptoms, and management of both complications were collected. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables and the independent t-test for continuous variables. Results: A total of 919 patients were included (74.6% female; age 42.5 years; BMI 54.6 kg/m²) with mean follow-up of 31.5 months. Eight patients (0.9%) developed MU and seven (0.8%) had dumping. Patients who developed MU were more likely to be using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (p = 0.006) and have a longer operation time (p = 0.047). Primary versus revisional surgery, and BDP/DS versus SADI-S were not associated with MU or dumping. Conclusions: The incidences of MU and dumping after DS were low. NSAID use and a longer operation time were associated with an increased risk of MU, whereas dumping was attributed to poor dietary habits.

Introduction Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess efficacy and safety of three novel protocol contributions (transversus abdominis plane blocks, ketamine and fosaprepitant), as well as their impact on length of stay (LOS) and on postoperative complications. Methods Effectiveness and safety were retrospectively investigated in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) over a 6-year period in a single institution. Group 1 patients were not exposed to any of our suggested interventions, whereas Group 2 were exposed to all of three. Results Between January 2015 and August 2021, 1480 patients underwent primary SG (77.6%) or RYGB (22.4%); of those, 1132 (76.5%) and 348 (23.5%) were in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean BMI and age were 45.87 versus 43.65 kg/m² and 45.53 versus 44.99 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Suggested interventions were associated with lower operative times (84.79 ± 24.21 vs. 80.78 ± 32.8 min, p = 0.025). In Group 2, the mean LOS decreased in 0.18 day (1.79 ± 1.04 vs. 1.60 ± 0.90; p = 0.004). Overall complication rates were 8% and 8.6% for groups 1 and 2, respectively; readmission rates were 5.7% (64 pts) vs. 7.2% (25 pts), p > 0.05. Reoperations were less prevalent in Group 2 (1.5% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.79). Conclusion Focus on optimized pain management, allied to a superior PONV control, may be relevant contributors for a lower LOS without negative impacts in complications rates.

Background The benefits of oversewing the staple lines during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy have been controversial. No study examined the benefit of oversewing the staple lines in robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG). This retrospective study aims to examine the difference in immediate postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and emergency room visits between RSG patients with and without oversewn staple lines at a single, large-volume, bariatric center. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on 623 patients who underwent RSG between November 1, 2017, and November 1, 2019. Of these, 316 had their staple line oversewn between November 1, 2017, and November 12, 2018, and 307 did not have their staple line oversewn between November 13, 2018, and November 1, 2019. Results A total of 623 patients underwent RSG, of which 50.7% (n = 316) had their staple line oversewn. The mean length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups. However, the mean operative time was significantly longer in the “oversew” group than “no oversew” group by 7.4 minutes (p < 0.001). Readmission, reoperation, and intervention rates during the 30-day postoperative period were similar between the two groups. However, the percentage of patients requiring outpatient emergency room visits during the 30 days after RSG was significantly higher in the “oversew” group than that of the “no oversew” group. Conclusions No significant difference in major complications was found between RSG patients with and without oversewn staple lines. Oversewing of the staple line may be associated with increased emergency room visits.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the choice of bariatric procedure for patients with symptomatic reflux - and is known to be effective in reducing the need for anti-reflux medication postoperatively. However, a small number of RYGB patients can still develop severe reflux symptoms that require a surgical intervention. Aim: To examine and describe the patient population that requires an anti-reflux procedure after RYGB evaluating demographics, characteristics, symptoms and diagnosis Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 32 patients who underwent a hiatal hernia repair and/or Nissen fundoplication after RYGB Jul 1st, 2014 and Dec 31st, 2019. Patients were identified using the MBSAQIP database and their electronic medical records were reviewed. Results: Most patients were female (n=29, 90.6%). The mean age was 52.8 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 34.1 kg/m2 at the time of anti-reflux procedure. Patients underwent the anti-reflux procedure at a mean of 7.9 years after the RYGB procedure. The mean percentage of excess BMI loss during the time between RYGB and anti-reflux procedure was 63.4%. Conclusions: Female patients with a significant weight loss may develop a severe reflux symptoms years after RYGB. Complaints of reflux after RYGB should not be overlooked. Careful follow-up and appropriate treatment (including surgical intervention) is needed for this population.

Background: One of the most significant concerns after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the new-onset or worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some patients with LSG undergo a conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) because of severe GERD. Cardiopexy at the time of LSG may help prevent GERD. This study aims to examine the safety and effectiveness of cardiopexy at the time of LSG. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 161 consecutive patients who underwent LSG between May 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018. Of these, 79 underwent cardiopexy at the time of LSG. Weight, comorbidities, and complications were recorded at 6 months after LSG. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the cardiopexy and noncardiopexy groups of patients. In the cardiopexy group, 8 (10.1%) patients reported having GERD at the time of LSG, whereas 12 (14.6%) patients did in the noncardiopexy group. At 6 months after the procedure, 5 (8.9%) patients in the cardiopexy group reported symptoms of GERD, whereas 14 (17.7%) patients did in the noncardiopexy group (P=0.15). One (1.3%) patient in the cardiopexy group and 2 (2.4%) patients in the noncardiopexy group were converted to an RYGB because of severe reflux (P=0.58). The percentage of excess body mass index loss and the percentage of total weight loss were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Cardiopexy was not associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic GERD and conversion to RYGB after 6 months.

Duodenal switch is a choice of conversion when patients fail to lose or regain weight after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of duodenal switch as a secondary operation for patients who presented with insufficient weight loss or weight regain after a RYGB.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the preferred surgical intervention to treat morbid obesity. Despite the rising popularity of LSG, little is known on the histopathologic findings of the resected partial stomach specimens. Our study aims to identify prevalent pathologic findings of the removed stomach and explore the association between patient characteristics and abnormal findings.