Jeffery Layton Ullman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jeffery Layton Ullman has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Rasool Bux Mahar
Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University of Technology and Skill Development Khairpur, Khairpur 66151, Pakistan
3 shared publications - Abdul Majeed Pirzada
Department of Environmental Sciences, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi 74000, Pakistan
2 shared publications - Ayaz Ali Shah
Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Dawood University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
2 shared publications - Imran Ali
Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi 110025, India
2 shared publications - Mohammad Ilyas Khan
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
2 shared publications - Nabi Bakhsh Mallah
Department of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Hamdard University, Karachi 75210, Pakistan
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Development of Antifouling Polyvinylidene Fluoride and Cellulose Acetate Nanocomposite Membranes for Wastewater Treatment Using a Membrane Bioreactor
Membrane technology has received great attention in the desalination and water treatment sectors over the last few decades. However, membrane fouling remains a critical issue that affects membrane performance, a phenomenon common in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). This major drawback can be overcome by the preparation of antifouling membranes using an electrospinning technique that generates a hydrophilic modification of membranes. In this study, nanocomposite polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and cellulose acetate (CA) polymer was fabricated to mitigate membrane fouling. Surface and mechanical characterization of the electrospun membrane was performed to assess morphology, chemical composition, and hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties. Anti-fouling performance of the composite PVDF/CA membrane was evaluated versus a neat PVDF membrane through bench-scale experiments. The PVDF/CA nanofiber membrane displayed a more hydrophilic nature, demonstrated by a lower water contact angle (101° vs. 115°) and increased wastewater flux (190 L/m2·h. vs. 160 L/m2·h), although the composite membrane demonstrated lower tensile strength (2.0 ± 0.1 MPa vs. 1.7 ± 0.1 MPa). The new material demonstrated greater anti-fouling performance compared to the neat PVDF membrane. Results suggest that this nanofiber material shows promise as an enhanced antifouling membrane that can overcome membrane fouling limitations.
Open AccessDevelopment of Antifouling Polyvinylidene Fluoride and Cellulose Acetate Nanocomposite Membranes for Wastewater Treatment Using a Membrane Bioreactor
Membrane technology has received great attention in the desalination and water treatment sectors over the last few decades. However, membrane fouling remains a critical issue that affects membrane performance, a phenomenon common in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). This major drawback can be overcome by the preparation of antifouling membranes using an electrospinning technique that generates a hydrophilic modification of membranes. In this study, nanocomposite polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and cellulose acetate (CA) polymer was fabricated to mitigate membrane fouling. Surface and mechanical characterization of the electrospun membrane was performed to assess morphology, chemical composition, and hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties. Anti-fouling performance of the composite PVDF/CA membrane was evaluated versus a neat PVDF membrane through bench-scale experiments. The PVDF/CA nanofiber membrane displayed a more hydrophilic nature, demonstrated by a lower water contact angle (101° vs. 115°) and increased wastewater flux (190 L/m2·h. vs. 160 L/m2·h), although the composite membrane demonstrated lower tensile strength (2.0 ± 0.1 MPa vs. 1.7 ± 0.1 MPa). The new material demonstrated greater anti-fouling performance compared to the neat PVDF membrane. Results suggest that this nanofiber material shows promise as an enhanced antifouling membrane that can overcome membrane fouling limitations.
- Open Access
Advanced Control Strategies of Membrane Fouling in Wastewater Treatment: A Review
Reverse osmosis and microfiltration are two membrane-based separation techniques that have gained popularity over the past few decades. A fundamental barrier to improving the overall efficiency of membrane separation is membrane fouling. The accumulation of foulants causes a reduction in permeate flux, a loss of selectivity and permeability, and a reduction in the membrane’s lifespan. Numerous chemical and physical surface changes have been studied to enhance membrane antifouling properties. Additionally, research has concentrated on creating membranes that use cutting-edge materials to improve their antifouling capability. This paper focuses on a wide-ranging and thorough analyses of the different types of fouling during wastewater treatment based on current research results regarding fouling control strategy and the potential of new methods for wastewater treatment. It is a further step forward for the evaluation of mitigation measures for emerging membrane fouling problems.
Open AccessAdvanced Control Strategies of Membrane Fouling in Wastewater Treatment: A Review
Reverse osmosis and microfiltration are two membrane-based separation techniques that have gained popularity over the past few decades. A fundamental barrier to improving the overall efficiency of membrane separation is membrane fouling. The accumulation of foulants causes a reduction in permeate flux, a loss of selectivity and permeability, and a reduction in the membrane’s lifespan. Numerous chemical and physical surface changes have been studied to enhance membrane antifouling properties. Additionally, research has concentrated on creating membranes that use cutting-edge materials to improve their antifouling capability. This paper focuses on a wide-ranging and thorough analyses of the different types of fouling during wastewater treatment based on current research results regarding fouling control strategy and the potential of new methods for wastewater treatment. It is a further step forward for the evaluation of mitigation measures for emerging membrane fouling problems.
- Open Access
Lignocellulosic Based Biochar Adsorbents for the Removal of Fluoride and Arsenic from Aqueous Solution: Isotherm and Kinetic Modeling
Eucalyptus wood is made up of lignocellulosic material; this lignocellulosic material contains two types of biopolymers, i.e., carbohydrate and aromatic polymers. In this study, this lignocellulosic material was used to prepare biochar. Three biochar, i.e., laboratory-based (B1), barrel-based (B2), and brick kiln-biochar (B3), were used for fluoride and arsenic removal from aqueous solution. Barrel-based biochar was prepared by using the two-barrel method’s alteration. The highest fluoride removal (99%) was attained at pH 2 in the presence of B1, while in the presence of B2 and B3, maximum fluoride removal was 90% and 45.7%, respectively. At pH 10, the maximum arsenic removal in the presence of B1, B2, and B3 was 96%, 94%, and 93%, respectively. The surface characteristics obtained by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed the presence of carbonyl group (C-O), and alkene (C=C) functional groups on all the three studied biochars. Isotherm studies showed that the adsorption was monolayered (all the adsorbed molecules were in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent) as the Langmuir isotherm model best fits the obtained data. Adsorption kinetics was also performed. The R2 value supports the pseudo-second-order kinetics, which means that chemisorption was involved in adsorbing fluoride and arsenic. It is concluded that B1 gives maximum removal for both fluoride (99%) and arsenic (96%). The study shows that lignocellulose-based biochar can be used for arsenic and fluoride removal from water.
Open AccessLignocellulosic Based Biochar Adsorbents for the Removal of Fluoride and Arsenic from Aqueous Solution: Isotherm and Kinetic Modeling
Eucalyptus wood is made up of lignocellulosic material; this lignocellulosic material contains two types of biopolymers, i.e., carbohydrate and aromatic polymers. In this study, this lignocellulosic material was used to prepare biochar. Three biochar, i.e., laboratory-based (B1), barrel-based (B2), and brick kiln-biochar (B3), were used for fluoride and arsenic removal from aqueous solution. Barrel-based biochar was prepared by using the two-barrel method’s alteration. The highest fluoride removal (99%) was attained at pH 2 in the presence of B1, while in the presence of B2 and B3, maximum fluoride removal was 90% and 45.7%, respectively. At pH 10, the maximum arsenic removal in the presence of B1, B2, and B3 was 96%, 94%, and 93%, respectively. The surface characteristics obtained by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed the presence of carbonyl group (C-O), and alkene (C=C) functional groups on all the three studied biochars. Isotherm studies showed that the adsorption was monolayered (all the adsorbed molecules were in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent) as the Langmuir isotherm model best fits the obtained data. Adsorption kinetics was also performed. The R2 value supports the pseudo-second-order kinetics, which means that chemisorption was involved in adsorbing fluoride and arsenic. It is concluded that B1 gives maximum removal for both fluoride (99%) and arsenic (96%). The study shows that lignocellulose-based biochar can be used for arsenic and fluoride removal from water.
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Desalination Publications in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 206, 144-152
Digestion of linoleic acid using an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Desalination Publications in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 206, 144-152
Digestion of linoleic acid using an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor