Nafees Haider
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Nafees Haider has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abu Fahad Abbasi
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
3 shared publications - Adekunle Sanyaolu
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Professions, D’Youville University, Buffalo, NY 14201, USA
3 shared publications - Aleksandra Marinkovic
Saint James School of Medicine, Anguilla, British West Indies
3 shared publications - Chuku Okorie
Union County College (Plainfield Campus), Plainfield, NJ, USA
3 shared publications - Stephanie Prakash
Saint James School of Medicine, Anguilla, British West Indies
3 shared publications - Amarachi Ekeh
Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curaçao
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 January 2022
- Published by XMLink in Infection & Chemotherapy
- Vol. 54 (2) , 236-246
Candida auris: An Overview of the Emerging Drug-Resistant Fungal Infection
Sanyaolu A, et al. Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;54:e44. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2022.0008
- 1 January 2022
- Published by XMLink in Infection & Chemotherapy
- Vol. 54 (2) , 236-246
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessCandida auris: An Overview of the Emerging Drug-Resistant Fungal Infection
Sanyaolu A, et al. Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;54:e44. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2022.0008
- Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Korean Vaccine Society in Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , 104-115
Reactogenicity to COVID-19 vaccination in the United States of America
Sanyaolu A, et al. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):104-115. https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.104
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Korean Vaccine Society in Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , 104-115
Open AccessReactogenicity to COVID-19 vaccination in the United States of America
Sanyaolu A, et al. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):104-115. https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.104
- Open Access
- 25 July 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 2 (9) , 1393-1400
Navigating the Diagnostics of COVID-19
The recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began in Hubei province, China, in December 2019 and has spread worldwide at an alarming rate. With over eight million individuals infected and exceeding 400,000 deaths globally, the necessity to develop fast and efficient diagnostic methods is of high importance. This paper reports on currently available diagnostic screening methods for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to guide frontline healthcare workers involved with the diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patient. An electronic literature search was performed for peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2020, until June 19, 2020. Published articles were then reviewed and included based on the applicability to the topic. The preferred diagnostic approach is the reverse transcription (RT) of the virus’ ribonucleic acid (RNA) followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (RT-PCR). However, this method has been proven to be time-consuming. In improving the speed and efficiency of diagnostics, newer rapid diagnostic serological tests are in development for testing SARS-CoV-2, each with its unique advantages and disadvantages. They could potentially be used as triage tests to rapidly identify patients who are very likely to have COVID-19 in combination with other accurate diagnostic methods, such as diagnostic imaging. A combination of the disease history, clinical manifestations, laboratory diagnostic testing, and diagnostic imaging is crucial for making an accurate and useful diagnosis for COVID-19. Hopefully, the continuous development and use of rapid diagnostic tests and the implementation of public health measures will help control the spread of the disease.
- 25 July 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 2 (9) , 1393-1400
Open AccessNavigating the Diagnostics of COVID-19
The recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began in Hubei province, China, in December 2019 and has spread worldwide at an alarming rate. With over eight million individuals infected and exceeding 400,000 deaths globally, the necessity to develop fast and efficient diagnostic methods is of high importance. This paper reports on currently available diagnostic screening methods for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to guide frontline healthcare workers involved with the diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patient. An electronic literature search was performed for peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2020, until June 19, 2020. Published articles were then reviewed and included based on the applicability to the topic. The preferred diagnostic approach is the reverse transcription (RT) of the virus’ ribonucleic acid (RNA) followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (RT-PCR). However, this method has been proven to be time-consuming. In improving the speed and efficiency of diagnostics, newer rapid diagnostic serological tests are in development for testing SARS-CoV-2, each with its unique advantages and disadvantages. They could potentially be used as triage tests to rapidly identify patients who are very likely to have COVID-19 in combination with other accurate diagnostic methods, such as diagnostic imaging. A combination of the disease history, clinical manifestations, laboratory diagnostic testing, and diagnostic imaging is crucial for making an accurate and useful diagnosis for COVID-19. Hopefully, the continuous development and use of rapid diagnostic tests and the implementation of public health measures will help control the spread of the disease.