Yingjie Guo

Yingjie Guo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Yingjie Guo has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Interpretable multimodal learning for tumor protein-metal binding: Progress, challenges, and perspectives

    by Xiaokun Liu, Sayedmohammadreza Rastegari, Yijun Huang, Sxe Chang Cheong, Weikang Liu, Wenjie Zhao, Qihao Tian, Hongming Wang, Yingjie Guo, Shuo Zhou, et al.


  • Open Access

    Maximal Information Coefficient-Based Testing to Identify Epistasis in Case-Control Association Studies

    by Yingjie Guo, Zhian Yuan, Zhen Liang, Yang Wang, Yanpeng Wang, Lei Xu

    Interactions between genetic variants (epistasis) are ubiquitous in the model system and can significantly affect evolutionary adaptation, genetic mapping, and precision medical efforts. In this paper, we proposed a method for epistasis detection, called EpiMIC (epistasis detection through a maximal information coefficient (MIC)). MIC is a promising bivariate dependence measure explicitly designed for rapidly exploring various function types equally and for interpreting and comparing them on the same scale. Most epistasis detection approaches make assumptions about the form of the association between genetic variants, resulting in limited statistical performance. Based on the notion that if two SNPs do not interact, their joint distribution in all samples and in only cases should not be substantially different. We developed a statistic that utilizes the difference of MIC as a signal of epistasis and combined it with a permutation resampling strategy to estimate the empirical distribution of our statistic. Results of simulation and real-world data set showed that EpiMIC outperformed previous approaches for identifying epistasis at varying degrees of heredity.


  • Open Access

    Testing Gene-Gene Interactions Based on a Neighborhood Perspective in Genome-wide Association Studies

    by Yingjie Guo, Honghong Cheng, Zhian Yuan, Zhen Liang, Yang Wang, Debing Du

    Unexplained genetic variation that causes complex diseases is often induced by gene-gene interactions (GGIs). Gene-based methods are one of the current statistical methodologies for discovering GGIs in case-control genome-wide association studies that are not only powerful statistically, but also interpretable biologically. However, most approaches include assumptions about the form of GGIs, which results in poor statistical performance. As a result, we propose gene-based testing based on the maximal neighborhood coefficient (MNC) called gene-based gene-gene interaction through a maximal neighborhood coefficient (GBMNC). MNC is a metric for capturing a wide range of relationships between two random vectors with arbitrary, but not necessarily equal, dimensions. We established a statistic that leverages the difference in MNC in case and in control samples as an indication of the existence of GGIs, based on the assumption that the joint distribution of two genes in cases and controls should not be substantially different if there is no interaction between them. We then used a permutation-based statistical test to evaluate this statistic and calculate a statistical p-value to represent the significance of the interaction. Experimental results using both simulation and real data showed that our approach outperformed earlier methods for detecting GGIs.


  • Open Access

    Gene-Based Nonparametric Testing of Interactions Using Distance Correlation Coefficient in Case-Control Association Studies

    by Yingjie Guo, Chenxi Wu, Maozu Guo, Xiaoyan Liu, Alon Keinan

    Among the various statistical methods for identifying gene–gene interactions in qualitative genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene-based methods have recently grown in popularity because they confer advantages in both statistical power and biological interpretability. However, most of these methods make strong assumptions about the form of the relationship between traits and single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which result in limited statistical power. In this paper, we propose a gene-based method based on the distance correlation coefficient called gene-based gene-gene interaction via distance correlation coefficient (GBDcor). The distance correlation (dCor) is a measurement of the dependency between two random vectors with arbitrary, and not necessarily equal, dimensions. We used the difference in dCor in case and control datasets as an indicator of gene–gene interaction, which was based on the assumption that the joint distribution of two genes in case subjects and in control subjects should not be significantly different if the two genes do not interact. We designed a permutation-based statistical test to evaluate the difference between dCor in cases and controls for a pair of genes, and we provided the p-value for the statistic to represent the significance of the interaction between the two genes. In experiments with both simulated and real-world data, our method outperformed previous approaches in detecting interactions accurately.