Motoyasu Kan

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a refractory malignancy with a dismal prognosis. For unresectable PC, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is widely used as first-line chemotherapy. During treatment, patients may require unplanned hospitalization (UPH) due to tumor progression, biliary obstruction, or chemotherapy-related adverse events. Although UPH during chemotherapy may be linked to poorer survival, its prognostic impact as a time-dependent clinical event during active treatment has not been empirically evaluated in unresectable PC. We investigated the prognostic impact of UPH occurring during first-line GnP therapy. Objective: To clarify the association between UPH during first-line GnP and overall survival (OS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 189 patients with histologically confirmed unresectable PC who received first-line GnP at our institution between February 2016 and February 2023. The occurrence of UPH during GnP and the reason for the first UPH were categorized. Associations with OS were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models, including a time-varying covariate (TVC) analysis. Risk factors for UPH were examined with logistic regression. Results: UPH occurred in 76 patients (40.2%) during GnP. Pancreatic head tumors and pre-treatment biliary drainage were significantly more frequent in the UPH group. Median OS was 10.88 months in the UPH group versus 19.23 months in the non-UPH group; UPH was a significant adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis incorporating a TVC, UPH remained an independent predictor of worse prognosis (HR 3.02, p < 0.01). Reasons for first UPH were progression (n = 28), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO; n = 26), GnP-related adverse event (AE; n = 16), and other (n = 6). Hospitalization due to progression or RBO was associated with poorer survival. Pancreatic head location was identified as a risk factor for UPH. Conclusions: UPH during first-line GnP is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with unresectable PC, even after accounting for TVC. In pancreatic head cancer, closer monitoring for biliary and obstructive complications may be particularly important during treatment.

Cancer cachexia, which is characterized by weight loss and muscle weakness, is common in patients with pancreatic cancer. Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist, has shown potential for the management of cachexia in various cancers. We herein report a 64-year-old man with unresectable pancreatic cancer who experienced significant weight gain with anamorelin, allowing for continued chemotherapy and an improved quality of life. Despite disease progression, his response suggests the potential utility of anamorelin as a supportive therapy. Cachexia's complex metabolic changes make treatment difficult; however, anamorelin's appetite and weight gain effects highlight its possible role in managing cachexia in pancreatic cancer. Therefore, further research is required in this regard.

Pancreatic cancer is an intractable malignancy associated with a dismal prognosis. Undifferentiated carcinoma, a rare subtype, poses a clinical challenge owing to a limited understanding of its molecular characteristics. In this study, we conducted genomic analysis specifically on a case of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas exhibiting squamous differentiation. An 80 -year -old male, previously treated for colorectal cancer, presented with a mass with central cystic degeneration in the pancreatic tail. The mass was diagnosed pathologically as undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas with squamous differentiation. Despite surgical resection and chemotherapy, the patient faced early postoperative recurrence, emphasizing the aggressive nature of this malignancy. Genomic analysis of distinct histologic components revealed some common mutations between undifferentiated and squamous components, including Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) and TP53. Notably, the squamous component harbored some specific mutations in SMARCA4 and SMARCB1 genes that code for members of the SWItch/Sucrose Non -Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. The common mutations in the undifferentiated and squamous cell carcinoma components from this analysis suggest that they originate from a common origin. The discussion also underscores the scarcity of genomic analyses on undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas, with existing literature pointing to SWI/SNF complex-related gene mutations. However, our case introduces chromatin remodeling factor mutations as relevant in squamous differentiation. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the genomic landscape of undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with squamous differentiation. These findings suggest the importance of further research and targeted therapies to improve the management of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas and enhance patient outcomes.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic uncovered metal stent (UMS) placement has been widely performed for unresectable hilar malignant biliary stricture (UHMBS). Two stenting methods are used for the two bile duct branches: side-by-side placement (SBS) and partial stent-in-stent placement (PSIS). However, it remains controversial whether SBS or PSIS is superior. This study aimed to compare SBS and PSIS in UHMBS cases with UMS placement in two branches of the IHD. Methods: This retrospective study included 89 cases of UHMBS treated with UMS placement through the SBS or PSIS technique using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups, SBS (n = 64) and PSIS (n = 25), and compared. Results: Clinical success was achieved in 79.7% and 80.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.97). The adverse event rate was 20.3% and 12.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.36). The recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate was 32.8% and 28.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.66). The median cumulative time to RBO was 224 and 178 days in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.52). The median procedure time was 43 and 62 min in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively, which was significantly longer in the PSIS group (p = 0.014). Conclusions: No significant differences were noted in the clinical success rate, adverse event rate, time to RBO, or overall survival between the SBS and PSIS groups, other than the significantly longer procedure time in the PSIS group.

Background and objectives: The safety of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in older adults remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EHL using peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance in older adults aged ≥80 years. Materials and Methods: This retrospective clinical study was conducted at a single center. Fifty patients with common bile duct stones who underwent EHL using POCS under ERCP guidance at our institution, between April 2017 and September 2022, were enrolled in this study. The eligible patients were divided into an elderly group (n = 21, age ≥80 years) and a non-elderly group (n = 29, age ≤79 years), and were analyzed. Results: A total of 33 and 40 EHL procedures were performed in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. After excluding cases in which stone removal was performed at other institutions, complete removal of common bile duct stones was confirmed in 93.8% and 100% of the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.20). The mean number of ERCPs required for complete removal of bile duct stones was 2.9 and 4.3 in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.17). In the EHL session, the overall occurrence of adverse events was eight and seven in the elderly (24.2%) and non-elderly (17.5%) groups, respectively; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.48). Conclusions: EHL using POCS under ERCP guidance is effective in patients aged ≥80 years and there was no significant increase in adverse event rates compared to those aged ≤79 years.

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle. This was a single-center retrospective study. Fourteen patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle were examined. Fourteen eligible patients were included in this study. The age of patients ranged from 55 to 93 years, with a median of 76 years. Of patients with existing underlying diseases, there were 8 cases of pancreatic cancer (57.1%), 2 cases of metastatic liver tumor (14.3%), 2 cases of bile duct stones (14.3%), 1 case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (7.1%), and 1 case of gallbladder cancer (7.1%). Regarding gastrointestinal anatomy, there were 11 cases (78.6%) of normal and 3 cases (21.4%) of gastric resection with Roux-en-Y. Reasons for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy were duodenal obstruction in 7 cases (50.0%), surgically altered anatomy in 3 cases (21.4%), and 4 cases (28.6%) of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Technical success was achieved in 11 cases (78.6%). Subsequently, 11 cases of technical success were analyzed. There were 5 cases of puncturing B2 (45.5%). The puncture bile duct diameter ranged from 3.1 to 5.7 mm, with a median of 4.4 mm. endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade procedures was combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in 2 cases (18.2%). Clinical success was achieved in all the cases. The procedure time ranged from 15 to 93 minutes, with a median duration of 35 minutes. Regarding the type of stent placed in hepaticogastrostomy, a plastic stent was placed in 10 cases (90.9%) and a metal stent was placed in 1 case (9.1%). Early adverse events occurred in 4 cases (36.4%), and all of these cases developed biliary peritonitis, late adverse events occurred in 1 case (9.1%), this was biloma. A change to a 0.025-inch guidewire during the procedure was required in 8 cases (72.7%). Esophageal puncture was not performed. endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle is effective. However, in 72.7% of the cases started using the 0.018-inch guidewire, the guidewire was exchanged for a 0.025-inch guidewire during procedure.

Previous RNA immunoprecipitation followed by proteomic approaches successfully demonstrated that Embryonic Lethal, Abnormal Vision, Drosophila-Like 1 (ELAVL1) interacts with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-derived RNAs. Although ELAVL family proteins stabilize AU-rich element (ARE)-containing mRNAs, their role in HBV transcription remains unclear. This study conducted loss-of-function assays of ELAVL1 for inducible HBV-replicating HepAD38 cells and HBx-overexpressed HepG2 cells. In addition, clinicopathological analyses in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgical samples were also conducted. Lentivirus-mediated short hairpin RNA knockdown of ELAVL1 resulted in a decrease in both viral RNA transcription and production of viral proteins, including HBs and HBx, probably due to RNA stabilization by ELAVL1. Cell growth of HepAD38 cells was more significantly impaired in ELAVL1-knockdown than those in the control group, with or without HBV replication, indicating that ELAVL1 is involved in proliferation by factors other than HBV-derived RNAs. Immunohistochemical analyses of 77 paired HCC surgical specimens demonstrated that diffuse ELAVL1 expression was detected more frequently in HCC tissues (61.0%) than in non-tumor tissues (27.3%). In addition, the abundant expression of ELAVL1 tended to affect postoperative recurrence in HBV-related HCC patients. In conclusion, ELAVL1 contributes not only to HBV replication but also to HCC cell growth. It may be a potent therapeutic target for HBV-related HCC treatment.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single pigtail stent made by cutting a nasobiliary drainage tube (NBD stent) by comparing the clinical outcomes of using an NBD stent and those of using a ready-made double pigtail stent (RDP stent) in endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis. This was a single-center retrospective study involving 20 cases that had technical success with EGBS for acute cholecystitis; the patients were divided into two groups: those using NBD stent (NBD group) and those using RDP stent (RDP group). The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. There were 13 patients in the NBD group and seven in the RDP group. The rates of clinical success (NBD group: 92% vs. RDP group: 100%, p=0.45) did not differ significantly between the groups. Regarding adverse events, gallbladder perforation occurred in one case in the NBD group; however, no other adverse events occurred in either group (NBD group: 7.7% vs. RDP group: 0%, p=0.45). The stent patency periods did not differ significantly between the groups [NBD group: 43 (12-64) days vs. RDP group: 97 (58-215) days, p=0.17]. The stent patency period in cases of long-term stent placement after EGBS was 1,381 days and 1,579 days in the NBD group and 305 days in the RDP group, respectively. NBD stents are considered as effective as RDP stents in EGBS for acute cholecystitis. They are highly versatile and can be used for both bridging to surgery and long-term stent placement.