George M. Khalil

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with a weekly oral regimen of antiretroviral drugs could be a suitable preventative option for individuals who struggle with daily PrEP or prefer not to use long-acting injectables. We assessed in macaques the efficacy of weekly oral tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) at doses of 13.7 or 27.4 mg/kg. Macaques received weekly oral TAF for six weeks and were exposed twice-weekly to SHIV vaginally or rectally on day 3 and 6 after each dose. Median TFV-DP levels in PBMCs following the 13.7 mg/kg dose were 3110 and 1137 fmols/10⁶ cells on day 3 and 6, respectively. With the 27.4 mg/kg dose, TFV-DP levels were increased (~2-fold) on day 3 and 6 (6095 and 3290 fmols/10⁶ cells, respectively). Both TAF doses (13.7 and 27.4 mg/kg) conferred high efficacy (94.1% and 93.9%, respectively) against vaginal SHIV infection. Efficacy of the 27.4 mg/kg dose against rectal SHIV infection was 80.7%. We estimate that macaque doses of 13.7 and 27.4 mg/kg are equivalent to approximately 230 and 450 mg of TAF in humans, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a weekly oral PrEP regimen and suggest that a clinically achievable oral TAF dose could be a promising option for non-daily PrEP.

Self-collected specimens can expand access to SARS-CoV-2 testing. At a large inner-city hospital 1,082 participants self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swab (ANS) samples before healthcare workers collected nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples on the same day. To characterize patient preferences for self-collection, this investigation explored ability, comfort, and ease of ANS and saliva self-collection for SARS-CoV-2 testing along with associated patient characteristics, including medical history and symptoms of COVID-19. With nearly all participants successfully submitting a specimen, favorable ratings from most participants (at least >79% in ease and comfort), and equivocal preference between saliva and ANS, self-collection is a viable SARS-CoV-2 testing option.

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention tool, although effectiveness is dependent upon adherence. It is important to characterize the impact of PrEP on HIV antibody responses in people who experience breakthrough infections in order to understand the potential impact on timely diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Longitudinal HIV-1-specific antibody responses were evaluated in 42 people who inject drugs (PWID) from the Bangkok Tenofovir Study (placebo=28; PrEP=14) who acquired HIV while receiving PrEP. HIV-1 antibody levels and avidity to three envelope proteins (gp41, gp160, and gp120) were measured in the plasma using a customized Bio-Plex (Bio-Rad Laboratories) assay. A survival analysis was performed for each biomarker to compare the distribution of times at which study subjects exceeded the recent/long-term assay threshold, comparing PrEP and placebo treatment groups. We fit mixed-effects models to identify longitudinal differences in antibody levels and avidity between groups. Results: Overall, longitudinal antibody levels and avidity were notably lower in the PrEP breakthrough group compared to the placebo group. Survival analyses demonstrated a difference in time to antibody reactivity between treatment groups for all Bio-Plex biomarkers. Longitudinal gp120 antibody levels within the PrEP breakthrough group were decreased compared to the placebo group. When accounting for PrEP adherence, both gp120 and gp160 antibody levels were lower in the PrEP breakthrough group compared to the placebo group. Conclusion: We demonstrate hindered envelope antibody maturation in PWID who became infected while receiving PrEP in the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, which has significant implications for HIV diagnosis. Delayed maturation of the antibody response to HIV may increase the time to detection for antibody-based tests.