Jong-Mu Sun

Introduction Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for approximately 90% of all esophageal cancer cases and is associated with poor prognosis. However, recent advancements have transformed the treatment landscape. Tislelizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, was developed to overcome resistance mechanisms by minimizing binding to FcγR on macrophages. The RATIONALE-302 clinical trial showed statistically significant survival benefits of tislelizumab over chemotherapy in second-line ESCC highlighting the necessity of evaluating comparative efficacy with existing treatments. This study aimed to identify trials evaluating anti-PD-1 therapies for second-line ESCC and indirectly estimate the relative efficacy of tislelizumab versus existing anti-PD-1 therapies. Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) was originally conducted in 2021 then updated in 2022 and 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to evaluate required assumptions for indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) and determined that anchored simulated treatment comparisons (STCs) were the most appropriate methodology. Assessed outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs, whilst uncertainty was expressed in 95% confidence intervals. Results The SLR identified 13 studies, six of which evaluated immunotherapies and were included in the FA. All studies were deemed similar and considered in the ITC, except for RAMONA, which differed substantially in study design, inclusion criteria, and patient characteristics. Indirect estimates obtained from the STCs were not statistically significant, except for the comparison of TRAEs with tislelizumab versus camrelizumab, where tislelizumab was more favorable. Conclusions Tislelizumab appears comparable to existing anti-PD-1 therapies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, and sintilimab) in OS, PFS, and TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 for patients receiving second-line treatment for ESCC with a potentially more favorable TRAE grade ≥ 3 profile than camrelizumab that requires confirmation. Trial Registration NCT03430843.

PURPOSE: The surveillance protocol for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not contingent upon individualized risk factors for recurrence. This study aimed to use comprehensive data from clinical practice to develop a deep-learning model for practical longitudinal monitoring. METHODS: A multimodal deep-learning model with transformers was developed for real-time recurrence prediction using baseline clinical, pathological, and molecular data with longitudinal laboratory and radiologic data collected during surveillance. Patients with NSCLC (stage I to III) who underwent surgery with curative intent between January 2008 and September 2022 were included. The primary outcome was predicting recurrence within 1 year after the monitoring point. This study demonstrates the timely provision of risk scores (RADAR score) and determined thresholds and the corresponding AUC. RESULTS: A total of 14,177 patients were enrolled (10,262 with stage I, 2,380 with stage II, and 1,703 with stage III). The model incorporated 64 clinical-pathological-molecular factors at baseline, along with longitudinal laboratory and computed tomography imaging interpretation data. The mean baseline RADAR score was 0.324 (standard deviation [SD], 0.256) in stage I, 0.660 (SD, 0.210) in stage II, and 0.824 (SD, 0.140) in stage III. The AUC for predicting relapse within 1 year of the monitoring point was 0.854 across all stages, with a sensitivity of 86.0% and a specificity of 71.3% (AUC = 0.872 in stage I, AUC = 0.737 in stage II, and AUC = 0.724 in stage III). CONCLUSION: This pilot study introduces a deep-learning model that uses multimodal data from routine clinical practice to predict relapses in early-stage NSCLC. It demonstrates the timely provision of RADAR risk scores to clinicians for recurrence prediction, potentially guiding risk-adapted surveillance strategies and aggressive adjuvant systemic treatment.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) exhibit a high incidence in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) post-treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This investigation evaluates the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in patients with LMs resistant to prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase II multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, 80 mg osimertinib was administered to patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had developed LMs subsequent to treatment with prior EGFR TKIs. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), assessed alongside objective response rate by the blinded independent central review (BICR) and a pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first day of cycles 3 and 6. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients diagnosed with LM were treated with osimertinib, including 64 patients evaluable for the LM efficacy set—T790M negative (n = 62) and T790M positive (n = 2). The median OS in the full-analysis set was 15.6 months (95% CI, 11.5 to 20.2). The objective response rate for LM was 51.6%, including a 15.6% complete response, and the disease control rate was 81.3% by BICR in the LM efficacy evaluable set. The median LM progression-free survival by BICR was 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 15.3), the duration of response was 12.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 17.7), and OS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 18.7). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the CSF to free plasma osimertinib ratio was 22%. Most safety profiles were grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates significant intracranial efficacy and survival benefits of 80 mg once daily osimertinib in NSCLC patients with LMs. The data support considering daily 80 mg of osimertinib as a treatment option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LMs, irrespective of T790M mutation status.

PURPOSE: In the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a driver mutation, the role of anti–PD-(L)1 antibody after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains unclear. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluates the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP ) in EGFR- or ALK-rearranged or translocated NSCLC upon progression on TKI therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the clinical efficacy of ABCP followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PC) followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 228 patients with activating EGFR mutation (n = 215) or ALK translocation (n = 13) were enrolled from 16 sites in the Republic of Korea and randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to either ABCP (n = 154) or PC arm (n = 74). The median follow-up duration was 26.1 months (95% CI, 24.7 to 28.2). Objective response rates (69.5% v 41.9%, P < .001) and median PFS (8.48 v 5.62 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86]; P = .004) were significantly better in the ABCP than PC arm. PFS benefit increased as PD-L1 expression increased, with an HR of 0.47, 0.41, and 0.24 for PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50%, respectively. Overall survival was similar between ABCP and PC arm (20.63 v 20.27 months, HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46]; P = .975). The safety profile of the ABCP arm was comparable with that previously reported, with no additional safety signals, but higher rates of treatment-related adverse events were observed compared with the PC arm. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized phase III study to demonstrate the clinical benefit of anti–PD-L1 antibody in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with EGFR- or ALK-rearranged or translocated NSCLC who have progressed on relevant targeted therapy.

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improves survival in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the optimal sequence for CRT and ICIs has not yet been established. We investigated the dynamics of peripheral blood immune cells during CRT to determine the best sequence for treatment. Methods: Peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected pre-treatment, weekly during CRT for 6 weeks, and 1 month post-treatment in 24 patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive CRT. Immune cell analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Ex vivo PD-1 blockade assays were performed by IFN-γ intracellular cytokine staining. Results: Lymphopenia was prominently observed during CRT and mostly recovered 1 month post-CRT. Robust proliferation of CD8+ T cells was induced, peaking in the last week during CRT and decreasing post-CRT. The robust proliferation of CD8+ T cells led to an increase in the frequency of CD28-CD57+ replicative senescent and terminally differentiated cells post-CRT. Tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells increased during CRT and peaked in the last week. One month post-CRT, the frequency of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells decreased and TOXhiTCF1lo terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells significantly increased. Anti-PD-1-induced functional restoration of PD-1+CD8+ T cells was maximized in the last week of CRT and significantly decreased post-CRT. Conclusions: The findings suggest that earlier administration of PD-1 blockade may be associated with superior efficacy compared to delayed administration after completion of CRT. These findings provide an immunological rationale for optimal timing of combining ICIs with CRT in clinical trials. Citation Format: Kyung Hwan Kim, Hongryull Pyo, Dongryul Oh, Jae Myoung Noh, Yong Chan Ahn, Hong In Yoon, Jiyun Lee, Sehhoon Park, Hyun-Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Keunchil Park, Bo Mi Ku, Myung-Ju Ahn, Eui-Cheol Shin. Dynamics of circulating immune cells during chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer support earlier administration of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5198.

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in all patients. The key secondary end point was OS in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥ 10%. RESULTS: In total, 512 patients across 11 countries/regions were randomly assigned. At final analysis, conducted after 410 death events occurred, OS was significantly longer with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in all patients (median, 8.6 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85]; one-sided P = .0001), and in patients with TAP ≥ 10% (median, 10.3 months v 6.8 months; HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79]; one-sided P = .0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across all predefined subgroups, including those defined by baseline TAP score, region, and race. Treatment with tislelizumab was associated with higher objective response rate (20.3% v 9.8%) and a more durable antitumor response (median, 7.1 months v 4.0 months) versus chemotherapy in all patients. Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (18.8% v 55.8%) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Tislelizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 TAP ≥ 10% also demonstrated statistically significant survival benefit with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Biomarkers on the basis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are potentially valuable in predicting the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, clinical application remains challenging because of methodologic limitations and laborious process involved in spatial analysis of TIL distribution in whole-slide images (WSI). METHODS: We have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)–powered WSI analyzer of TIL in the tumor microenvironment that can define three immune phenotypes (IPs): inflamed, immune-excluded, and immune-desert. These IPs were correlated with tumor response to ICI and survival in two independent cohorts of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESULTS: Inflamed IP correlated with enrichment in local immune cytolytic activity, higher response rate, and prolonged progression-free survival compared with patients with immune-excluded or immune-desert phenotypes. At the WSI level, there was significant positive correlation between tumor proportion score (TPS) as determined by the AI model and control TPS analyzed by pathologists ( P < .001). Overall, 44.0% of tumors were inflamed, 37.1% were immune-excluded, and 18.9% were immune-desert. Incidence of inflamed IP in patients with programmed death ligand-1 TPS at < 1%, 1%-49%, and ≥ 50% was 31.7%, 42.5%, and 56.8%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 4.1 months and 24.8 months with inflamed IP, 2.2 months and 14.0 months with immune-excluded IP, and 2.4 months and 10.6 months with immune-desert IP. CONCLUSION: The AI-powered spatial analysis of TIL correlated with tumor response and progression-free survival of ICI in advanced NSCLC. This is potentially a supplementary biomarker to TPS as determined by a pathologist.