Azam Khan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Azam Khan has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Muhammad Khurram Zahoor
Department of Petroleum & Gas Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan
2 shared publications Ameer Hamza
University of Engineering and Technology
1 shared publication- Arshad Shehzad Ahmad Shahid
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Maqsood Ahmad
Department of Petroleum Geoscience, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia
1 shared publication - Muhammad Hammad Rasool
Institute of Sustainable Energy and Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia
1 shared publication - Raba’atun Adawiyah Bt Shamsuddun
Institute of Sustainable Energy and Resources, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskander 32610, Malaysia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
- Vol. 16 (10)
Machine learning and deep learning for prediction of post-acidizing petrophysical properties in sandstone reservoirs: a physics-augmented data-driven framework
Predicting post-acidizing porosity and permeability in sandstone reservoirs remains a fundamental challenge due to complex, nonlinear acid–rock interactions. This study presents a physics-augmented machine learning and deep learning (ML/DL) framework that integrates 24 laboratory core-flooding measurements from the Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan, with 500 synthetic training samples generated by the Panga–Lemerle–Balakotaiah (PLB) two-scale continuum simulator. Eight ML/DL architectures are benchmarked on the augmented test set (n = 75): Support Vector Regression (SVR) achieves the highest porosity R $$^{2}$$ = 0.927 and Random Forest the highest permeability R $$^{2}$$ = 0.907. A systematic domain-gap analysis reveals that naive median imputation of the unknown HCl concentration causes catastrophic external validation failure (porosity R $$^{2}$$ =−2.34). Five targeted remediation strategies are evaluated. Strategy S4—Optuna-tuned LightGBM with Leave-One-Out cross-validated joint augmented+experimental training—raises external R $$^{2}$$ to 0.918 (porosity) and 0.841 (permeability), representing improvements of +3.25 and +2.18 R $$^{2}$$ units over baseline. SHAP interpretability analysis identifies HCl concentration, initial permeability, and the Damköhler number as collectively governing >75% of prediction variance. The framework provides a physically interpretable, calibration-ready forecasting tool for pre-treatment petrophysical prediction aligned with sustainable low-concentration acidizing design in accordance with UN SDG 7 and SDG 12.- 13 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
- Vol. 16 (10)
Open AccessMachine learning and deep learning for prediction of post-acidizing petrophysical properties in sandstone reservoirs: a physics-augmented data-driven framework
Predicting post-acidizing porosity and permeability in sandstone reservoirs remains a fundamental challenge due to complex, nonlinear acid–rock interactions. This study presents a physics-augmented machine learning and deep learning (ML/DL) framework that integrates 24 laboratory core-flooding measurements from the Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan, with 500 synthetic training samples generated by the Panga–Lemerle–Balakotaiah (PLB) two-scale continuum simulator. Eight ML/DL architectures are benchmarked on the augmented test set (n = 75): Support Vector Regression (SVR) achieves the highest porosity R $$^{2}$$ = 0.927 and Random Forest the highest permeability R $$^{2}$$ = 0.907. A systematic domain-gap analysis reveals that naive median imputation of the unknown HCl concentration causes catastrophic external validation failure (porosity R $$^{2}$$ =−2.34). Five targeted remediation strategies are evaluated. Strategy S4—Optuna-tuned LightGBM with Leave-One-Out cross-validated joint augmented+experimental training—raises external R $$^{2}$$ to 0.918 (porosity) and 0.841 (permeability), representing improvements of +3.25 and +2.18 R $$^{2}$$ units over baseline. SHAP interpretability analysis identifies HCl concentration, initial permeability, and the Damköhler number as collectively governing >75% of prediction variance. The framework provides a physically interpretable, calibration-ready forecasting tool for pre-treatment petrophysical prediction aligned with sustainable low-concentration acidizing design in accordance with UN SDG 7 and SDG 12. - Open Access
A Mineralogical Perspective on Rare Earth Elements (REEs) Extraction from Drill Cuttings: A Review
The growing demand for rare earth elements (REEs) in high-tech and green energy sectors has prompted renewed exploration of unconventional sources. Drill cuttings, which are commonly discarded during subsurface drilling, are increasingly recognized as a potentially valuable, underutilized secondary REE reservoir. This review adopts a mineral-first lens to assess REE occurrence, extractability, and recovery strategies from drill cuttings across various lithologies. Emphasis is placed on how REEs associate with specific mineral host phases ranging from ion-adsorbed clays and organically bound forms to structurally integrated phosphates, each dictating distinct leaching pathways. The impact of drilling fluids on REE surface chemistry and mineral integrity is critically examined, alongside an evaluation of analytical and extraction methods tailored to different host phases. A scenario-based qualitative techno-economic assessment and a novel decision-tree framework are introduced to align mineralogy with optimal recovery strategies. Limitations in prior studies, particularly in characterization workflows and mineralogical misalignment in leaching protocols, are highlighted. This review redefines drill cuttings from industrial waste to a strategic resource, advocating for mineralogically guided extraction approaches to enhance sustainability in the critical mineral supply chain.
Open AccessA Mineralogical Perspective on Rare Earth Elements (REEs) Extraction from Drill Cuttings: A Review
The growing demand for rare earth elements (REEs) in high-tech and green energy sectors has prompted renewed exploration of unconventional sources. Drill cuttings, which are commonly discarded during subsurface drilling, are increasingly recognized as a potentially valuable, underutilized secondary REE reservoir. This review adopts a mineral-first lens to assess REE occurrence, extractability, and recovery strategies from drill cuttings across various lithologies. Emphasis is placed on how REEs associate with specific mineral host phases ranging from ion-adsorbed clays and organically bound forms to structurally integrated phosphates, each dictating distinct leaching pathways. The impact of drilling fluids on REE surface chemistry and mineral integrity is critically examined, alongside an evaluation of analytical and extraction methods tailored to different host phases. A scenario-based qualitative techno-economic assessment and a novel decision-tree framework are introduced to align mineralogy with optimal recovery strategies. Limitations in prior studies, particularly in characterization workflows and mineralogical misalignment in leaching protocols, are highlighted. This review redefines drill cuttings from industrial waste to a strategic resource, advocating for mineralogically guided extraction approaches to enhance sustainability in the critical mineral supply chain.
- 12 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 436-441
Local Materials Drilling Mud: A Laboratory Approach
- 12 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 436-441
Local Materials Drilling Mud: A Laboratory Approach