Mairen H. Flinspach
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Mairen H. Flinspach has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Armin Niklas Flinspach
Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
1 shared publication - Florian Jürgen Raimann
Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
1 shared publication - Jasmina Sterz
Goethe University Frankfurt/Main
1 shared publication - Kai Zacharowski
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
1 shared publication - Lena Bepler
Frankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center FIneST, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
1 shared publication - Miriam Ruesseler
Goethe University Frankfurt, Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Education and Clinical Simulation, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 March 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (6) , 1726
Epidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material
Epidural catheterization has become an indispensable part of modern pain therapy, for example, in obstetrics. Learning how to master this skill is an important competency. Videos are among the information sources with the highest information content for learning such skills. The present study aims to analyze videos regarding epidural catheter placement provided on the YouTube platform based on a validated checklist. An expert workshop selected crucial items for learning epidural catheterization in obstetrics. Items were identified and optimized in a five-step testing process. Using this checklist, videos from YouTube were evaluated by eleven health care professionals. Sixteen videos were identified and analyzed. Concerning the catheterization-specific part of the checklist, only two videos showed satisfactory quality. In the didactic part, eleven out of 21 items reached a mean score >50% of the points. Regarding interrater reliability, the catheterization-specific checklist was shown to be substantial (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.610), and the didactic part was shown to be fair (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.401). Overall, standard monitoring and appropriate aseptic technique were followed in only 42% and 49% for the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the runtime and the content quality (p < 0.001). No correlation could be found in terms of platform rating parameters. The video quality varied highly in terms of the requirements of this practical skill. The majority appear unsuitable for self-study due to serious errors and deficiencies regarding patient safety. However, there is no quality control on free platforms. Accordingly, it is difficult to identify suitable videos for educational purposes.
- 20 March 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (6) , 1726
Open AccessEpidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material
Epidural catheterization has become an indispensable part of modern pain therapy, for example, in obstetrics. Learning how to master this skill is an important competency. Videos are among the information sources with the highest information content for learning such skills. The present study aims to analyze videos regarding epidural catheter placement provided on the YouTube platform based on a validated checklist. An expert workshop selected crucial items for learning epidural catheterization in obstetrics. Items were identified and optimized in a five-step testing process. Using this checklist, videos from YouTube were evaluated by eleven health care professionals. Sixteen videos were identified and analyzed. Concerning the catheterization-specific part of the checklist, only two videos showed satisfactory quality. In the didactic part, eleven out of 21 items reached a mean score >50% of the points. Regarding interrater reliability, the catheterization-specific checklist was shown to be substantial (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.610), and the didactic part was shown to be fair (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.401). Overall, standard monitoring and appropriate aseptic technique were followed in only 42% and 49% for the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the runtime and the content quality (p < 0.001). No correlation could be found in terms of platform rating parameters. The video quality varied highly in terms of the requirements of this practical skill. The majority appear unsuitable for self-study due to serious errors and deficiencies regarding patient safety. However, there is no quality control on free platforms. Accordingly, it is difficult to identify suitable videos for educational purposes.