Junaidah Jailani
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Junaidah Jailani has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Afizah Ayob
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
1 shared publication - Ali Hauashdh
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Malaysia
1 shared publication - Izurin Muhamad Amin
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
1 shared publication Muhammad Azim Mohd Shukri
Advanced Built Environment Sustainability Focus Group (BESTy), Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
1 shared publication- Nur Amierah Harun
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
1 shared publication - Nur Rahmawati Syamsiyah
Architecture Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS), Jl. Ahmad Yani No. 157 Pabelan, Kartasura, Sukoharjo 57169, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 3 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 301-311
Analysis of Safety Indicators for Risk Minimization of Prefabricated Construction Method
- 3 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 301-311
Analysis of Safety Indicators for Risk Minimization of Prefabricated Construction Method
- Open Access
- 20 March 2022
- Published by EconJournals in International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
- Vol. 12 (2) , 491-496
Benchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Higher Educational Buildings: A Case Study Approach
Previous studies have reported that buildings consume nearly 36% of the total energy used and contribute towards 30% of the total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Therefore, improving energy efficiency in buildings is essential to enhance a sustainable built environment. This research employed a case study approach with the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) being selected as the case study. A number of buildings recorded high annual energy consumption (EC) data while others recorded low energy consumption. This was due to the absence of a benchmark line reference for campus buildings, thereby causing a significant difference in the energy consumption of each building. The study's aim was to develop an energy efficiency benchmark for university buildings by using statistical analysis. From statistical analysis, the standard practical range was between 72.5–141.0 kWh/m2/yr. Buildings with an energy consumption per unit area value below 72.5 kWh/m2/yr are regarded as best energy efficient buildings. In contrast, those above 141.0 kWh/m2/yr are considered poor energy efficient buildings. For recommendation, buildings that exceed the maximum value of this range require stricter supervision and monitoring by the university management.
- 20 March 2022
- Published by EconJournals in International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
- Vol. 12 (2) , 491-496
Open AccessBenchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Higher Educational Buildings: A Case Study Approach
Previous studies have reported that buildings consume nearly 36% of the total energy used and contribute towards 30% of the total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Therefore, improving energy efficiency in buildings is essential to enhance a sustainable built environment. This research employed a case study approach with the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) being selected as the case study. A number of buildings recorded high annual energy consumption (EC) data while others recorded low energy consumption. This was due to the absence of a benchmark line reference for campus buildings, thereby causing a significant difference in the energy consumption of each building. The study's aim was to develop an energy efficiency benchmark for university buildings by using statistical analysis. From statistical analysis, the standard practical range was between 72.5–141.0 kWh/m2/yr. Buildings with an energy consumption per unit area value below 72.5 kWh/m2/yr are regarded as best energy efficient buildings. In contrast, those above 141.0 kWh/m2/yr are considered poor energy efficient buildings. For recommendation, buildings that exceed the maximum value of this range require stricter supervision and monitoring by the university management.