Min Meng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Min Meng has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chen Meng
Department of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
1 shared publication - Congcong Gu
Department of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
1 shared publication - Huiyun Zou
Department of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
1 shared publication - Qing Cheng
Center of Statistical Research, School of Statistics and Data Science, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
1 shared publication - Xuewen Li
Department of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
1 shared publication - Xun Sun
Shandong University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 3 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (19) , 9811
Evaluating Privacy-Conscious Federated Learning Strategies for Reliable Student Performance Prediction in Learning Analytics
Federated learning can support privacy-conscious student performance prediction by enabling collaborative model training across educational institutions without centralizing sensitive student records. However, existing educational federated learning research is dominated by FedAvg, while alternative strategies such as FedProx are mainly explored in studies explicitly addressing non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) educational data. This study addresses this gap through a controlled comparison of seven federated learning strategies, including FedAvg, FedAvgM, FedProx, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, FedYogi, and FedMedian, using the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset. A Flower-based simulated federated learning framework was developed to evaluate these approaches across multiple student outcome prediction tasks. For Pass/Withdrawn prediction, FedMedian achieved the highest mean late-round accuracy and macro-. Hochberg corrected p-value showed significant differences between FedMedian and all six alternative methods for mean accuracy. For Pass/Fail prediction, FedMedian had the highest observed mean performance, but its advantage over the leading alternatives FedProx, FedAvgM, and FedAvg was not statistically confirmed under the corrected paired comparisons. FedProx had the highest observed late-round means for Fail/Distinction prediction but was not statistically distinguishable from FedAvg, FedAvgM, or FedAdagrad after Hochberg correction. None of the evaluated strategies achieved satisfactory balanced performance for the highly imbalanced Pass/Distinction prediction task, demonstrating the challenges of applying federated learning to complex educational outcomes. These findings indicate that FedAvg, despite being the most commonly adopted approach in educational federated learning, is not consistently optimal under heterogeneous educational data distributions. Instead, selecting federated optimization strategies according to task characteristics can improve model stability and prediction reliability. The study highlights the importance of responsible federated learning deployment in educational settings, where privacy-conscious analytics can support more reliable identification of student learning outcomes and inform evidence-based interventions.- 3 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (19) , 9811
Open AccessEvaluating Privacy-Conscious Federated Learning Strategies for Reliable Student Performance Prediction in Learning Analytics
Federated learning can support privacy-conscious student performance prediction by enabling collaborative model training across educational institutions without centralizing sensitive student records. However, existing educational federated learning research is dominated by FedAvg, while alternative strategies such as FedProx are mainly explored in studies explicitly addressing non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) educational data. This study addresses this gap through a controlled comparison of seven federated learning strategies, including FedAvg, FedAvgM, FedProx, FedAdagrad, FedAdam, FedYogi, and FedMedian, using the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset. A Flower-based simulated federated learning framework was developed to evaluate these approaches across multiple student outcome prediction tasks. For Pass/Withdrawn prediction, FedMedian achieved the highest mean late-round accuracy and macro-. Hochberg corrected p-value showed significant differences between FedMedian and all six alternative methods for mean accuracy. For Pass/Fail prediction, FedMedian had the highest observed mean performance, but its advantage over the leading alternatives FedProx, FedAvgM, and FedAvg was not statistically confirmed under the corrected paired comparisons. FedProx had the highest observed late-round means for Fail/Distinction prediction but was not statistically distinguishable from FedAvg, FedAvgM, or FedAdagrad after Hochberg correction. None of the evaluated strategies achieved satisfactory balanced performance for the highly imbalanced Pass/Distinction prediction task, demonstrating the challenges of applying federated learning to complex educational outcomes. These findings indicate that FedAvg, despite being the most commonly adopted approach in educational federated learning, is not consistently optimal under heterogeneous educational data distributions. Instead, selecting federated optimization strategies according to task characteristics can improve model stability and prediction reliability. The study highlights the importance of responsible federated learning deployment in educational settings, where privacy-conscious analytics can support more reliable identification of student learning outcomes and inform evidence-based interventions. - Open Access
- 31 March 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 19 (7) , 4167
Rapid Degradation of Chlortetracycline Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation with Hydrogen Peroxide
Chlortetracycline (CTC), which has been frequently detected in surface water, is generated primarily by the discharge of high-concentration CTC wastewater from pharmaceutical and livestock plants. The development of effective CTC degradation technology is critical. In this study, the extent of CTC degradation at 80 mg/L was investigated by combining hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The results indicate degradation ratios of 88.7% and 93.8% at 5 and 30 min, respectively. Furthermore, the possible mechanisms of CTC degradation were determined via HPLC-MS. The CTC degradation pathways include ring openings, C–N bond cleavage, demethylation, dehydroxylation, and desaturation in the sole system of HC, and a series of additional reactions, such as glycine conjugation and the cleavage of C–C double bonds, occurs in the binary system of HC + H2O2. Nevertheless, the treated water poses ecological risks and cannot be directly discharged into the environment. Therefore, HC + H2O2 treatment may be a rapid and effective primary method for the degradation of high-concentration CTC in pharmaceutical factories.
- 31 March 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 19 (7) , 4167
Open AccessRapid Degradation of Chlortetracycline Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation with Hydrogen Peroxide
Chlortetracycline (CTC), which has been frequently detected in surface water, is generated primarily by the discharge of high-concentration CTC wastewater from pharmaceutical and livestock plants. The development of effective CTC degradation technology is critical. In this study, the extent of CTC degradation at 80 mg/L was investigated by combining hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The results indicate degradation ratios of 88.7% and 93.8% at 5 and 30 min, respectively. Furthermore, the possible mechanisms of CTC degradation were determined via HPLC-MS. The CTC degradation pathways include ring openings, C–N bond cleavage, demethylation, dehydroxylation, and desaturation in the sole system of HC, and a series of additional reactions, such as glycine conjugation and the cleavage of C–C double bonds, occurs in the binary system of HC + H2O2. Nevertheless, the treated water poses ecological risks and cannot be directly discharged into the environment. Therefore, HC + H2O2 treatment may be a rapid and effective primary method for the degradation of high-concentration CTC in pharmaceutical factories.