ZGZoe Garoufalia

Zoe Garoufalia

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Zoe Garoufalia has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Expression of Tissue Remodeling- and Inflammation-Related Factors During the Wound-Healing Process in Humans

    by Dimitrios Vardakostas, Athanasios Moustogiannis, Zoe Garoufalia, Elli Karatza, Anastassios Philippou, Gregory Kouraklis, Michael Koutsilieris, Dimitrios Mantas

    Background/Objectives: There is a growing interest in the research of wound healing mechanisms worldwide. Particular attention has been paid to the expression of tissue remodeling- and inflammation-related factors. Herein, we investigate the expression patterns of TGF-β1, IL-6, TNF-a, uPA, uPA receptors, MMP-2, and MMP-9 through the four phases of the normal wound-healing process in humans. Methods: Twenty-two individuals presenting with a first episode of pilonidal sinus underwent surgical excision and the wound was left to heal by secondary intention. Sequential biopsies were collected on day 0 (operation), day 2 (inflammatory phase), day 9 (proliferative phase), and day 14 (tissue remodeling phase). The expression levels of the proteins were evaluated using reverse transcription–quantitative PCR. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunn’s Multiple Comparison post hoc test was used. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in the expressions of the factors during wound healing (p < 0.05). TGF-b1 increased on days 2 and 9. TNF-a increased on day 2 and then decreased on day 9. Il-6 was increased on day 2 and decreased on days 9 and 14. uPa mRNA increased up to day 9 but its receptor exhibited high expression throughout the observation time. Finally, MMP-2 mRNA expression increased on day 2 and declined on days 9 and 14, while MMP-9 was highly expressed until the 14th postoperative day. Conclusions: Each factor investigated in this study has an important and distinct role in the normal wound repair procedure. Further investigation is required to evaluate the tissue-specific regulation of these factors and their potential use as therapeutic targets or prognostic biomarkers in wound healing.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Guided Surgery in Colorectal Surgery

    by Zoe Garoufalia, Steven D. Wexner

    Background: Indocyanine green (ICG) imaging has been increasingly used for intraoperative guidance in colorectal surgery over the past decade. The aim of this study was to review and organize, according to different type of use, all available literature on ICG guided colorectal surgery and highlight areas in need of further research and discuss future perspectives. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically through November 2022 for all available studies on fluorescence-guided surgery in colorectal surgery. Results: Available studies described ICG use in colorectal surgery for perfusion assessment, ureteral and urethral assessment, lymphatic mapping, and hepatic and peritoneal metastases assessment. Although the level of evidence is low, results are promising, especially in the role of ICG in reducing anastomotic leaks. Conclusions: ICG imaging is a safe and relatively cheap imaging modality in colorectal surgery, especially for perfusion assessment. Work is underway regarding its use in lymphatic mapping, ureter identification, and the assessment of intraperitoneal metastatic disease.


  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

    by S. H. Emile, S. M. Khan, E. Silva-Alvarenga, Z. Garoufalia, S. D. Wexner

    Background Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly used to restore gastrointestinal continuity after surgical treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the outcomes of patients with MUC and patients with FAP who underwent IPAA. Methods A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2021. Cohort and randomized studies were eligible for inclusion if they directly compared patients with MUC and FAP who underwent IPAA. The main outcome measures were pouch failure, complications, and need for pouch excision or revision. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias across the studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted. Results Twenty-three studies (9200 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Seven thousand nine hundred fifty (86.4%) had MUC and 1250 (13.6%) had FAP. The median age of patients was 33.1 years. The male to female ratio was 1.4:1. MUC had higher odds of pouchitis (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.8–5.4, p < 0.001), stricture (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.25–2.65, p = 0.002), fistula (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.18–2.54, p = 0.004), and total complications (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.3–2.77, p < 0.001) as compared to FAP. Both groups had similar odds of pelvic sepsis, leakage, pouch failure, excision, revision, and fecal incontinence. Conclusions Although patients with MUC undergoing IPAA may be at a higher risk of developing complications, particularly pouchitis, stricture, and fistula; the ultimate and functional outcome of the pouch is similar to patients with FAP. Pouch failure, excision and revision were similar in the two groups.