Minas Panagiotidis

GDP, monetary variables, corruption, and uncertainty are crucial to energy policy decisions in today’s interrelated world. The global energy crisis, aggravated by rising energy prices, has sparked a thorough analysis of its causes. We demonstrate the significance of categorizing research by influence channels while focusing on their implications for energy policy decisions. We investigate the growing number of studies that use GDP, inflation, central banks’ characteristics, corruption, and uncertainty as critical factors in determining energy policies. Energy prices fluctuate because energy policies shift the supply–demand equilibrium. We categorise the effects and show that GDP, economic policy uncertainty, and, most notably, specific economic conditions and extreme events play a significant role in determining energy prices. We observed that energy consumption, GDP growth, and energy prices have a bidirectional, causal relationship. Still, the literature has not established which causative direction is the most significant. Taxes, interest rates, and corruption also significantly determine energy prices, although the origins of corruption have not been adequately examined. Lastly, uncertainty generally increases energy costs, but this relationship requires additional research in terms of the features of countries, conditions, and, most importantly, the theoretical backgrounds used.

Environmental control remains a salient aspect of states’ policies in the present decade. To reduce emissions, governments and central banks tend to adopt various strategies. The present research quantifies the nexus between fiscal and monetary policy, institutions’ quality, central bank characteristics, and carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions. Data has been sourced from 95 countries during the period from 1998 to 2019. According to the empirical results, the main determinants of gas emissions in developing countries are economic growth, government expenses, and central bank independence, whereas, in developed countries, they are economic growth, government efficiency, and central bank transparency and independence. Economic growth is a significant deteriorating factor in the state of the environment. By contrast, institutional and bureaucratic quality, measured through government effectiveness and expansionary fiscal policies as well as central bank independence and transparency, are ameliorating factors, as they decrease emissions. To conclude, governments must first reduce control over central banks and target government spending on the energy transition.

Aim and background—As research on the energy and electricity consumption determinants yields mixed results and a multifactorial model has not yet been developed, our study aims to investigate the growth dynamics of the factors that affect energy consumption in developed and developing countries. Motivation—The current global energy crisis has led us to a thorough investigation of the determinants that are affecting it. Hypothesis—It is hypothesized that a set of macro-financial, macro-environmental, and institutional variables are factors that causally affect energy and electricity consumption in a holistic model. Μethods—This research uses the data from 109 countries within a multivariate panel framework taken during 2010–2018, through the error correction, dynamic cointegration econometric methodologies, and causality tests. Results—The results indicate a coherent model with high interpretive power (80%) and that the main determinants of energy consumption in developing countries are economic growth, investment, and winter temperature, whereas, in developed countries, the determinants are trade openness, corruption, and innovation. Conclusion—Because energy consumption and economic growth share a bilateral relationship, the conservation of energy policy measures must be implemented according to the income category in which the country is classified.