JHJoshua Hyde

Joshua Hyde

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Joshua Hyde has a total of 24 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Nathan Thomas Matthew Huneke

    University of Southampton

    3 shared publications
  • Matthew Garner

    University of Southampton

    2 shared publications
  • Alexander McEwan

    1 shared publication
  • B. Dell'OSso

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy; Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, University of Milan, Milan 20142, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford Medical School, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Beatrice Benatti

    University of Milan, Department of Mental Health, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Milan, Italy; "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • C.J. Gosling

    Center for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Université Paris Nanterre, DysCo Lab, Nanterre F-92000, France; Université de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Boulogne-Billancourt F-92100, France

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on symptoms and interoception in trauma-related disorders and exposure to traumatic events: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    by L. Molteni, C.J. Gosling, H.A. Fagan, J. Hyde, B. Benatti, B. Dell'OSso, S. Cortese, D.S. Baldwin, N.T.M. Huneke


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Efficacy of neurostimulation across mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of 208 randomized controlled trials

    by Joshua Hyde, Hannah Carr, Nicholas Kelley, Rose Seneviratne, Claire Reed, Valeria Parlatini, Matthew Garner, Marco Solmi, Stella Rosson, Samuele Cortese, et al.

    Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), is a potentially effective treatment strategy for a number of mental conditions. However, no quantitative evidence synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TMS or tDCS using the same criteria including several mental conditions is available. Based on 208 RCTs identified in a systematic review, we conducted a series of random effects meta-analyses to assess the efficacy of NIBS, compared to sham, for core symptoms and cognitive functioning within a broad range of mental conditions. Outcomes included changes in core symptom severity and cognitive functioning from pre- to post-treatment. We found significant positive effects for several outcomes without significant heterogeneity including TMS for symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (SMD = −1.8 (95% CI: −2.6 to −1), and tDCS for symptoms of substance use disorder (−0.73, −1.00 to −0.46). There was also significant effects for TMS in obsessive-compulsive disorder (−0.66, −0.91 to −0.41) and unipolar depression symptoms (−0.60, −0.78 to −0.42) but with significant heterogeneity. However, subgroup analyses based on stimulation site and number of treatment sessions revealed evidence of positive effects, without significant heterogeneity, for specific TMS stimulation protocols. For neurocognitive outcomes, there was only significant evidence, without significant heterogeneity, for tDCS for improving attention (−0.3, −0.55 to −0.05) and working memory (−0.38, −0.74 to −0.03) in individuals with schizophrenia. We concluded that TMS and tDCS can benefit individuals with a variety of mental conditions, significantly improving clinical dimensions, including cognitive deficits in schizophrenia which are poorly responsive to pharmacotherapy.


  • Open Access

    A novel procedure to investigate social anxiety using videoconferencing software: A proof-of-concept study

    by Nathan T M Huneke, Hannah Rowlatt, Joshua Hyde, Alexander McEwan, Louise Maryan, David Baldwin, Matt Garner

    Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is very common and can be significantly disabling. New treatments are needed as the remission rate for SAD is the lowest of all the anxiety disorders. Experimental medicine models, in which features resembling a clinical disorder are experimentally induced, are a cost-effective and timely approach to explore potential novel treatments for psychiatric disorders. Following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, there is a need to develop experimental medicine models that can be carried out remotely. We developed a novel procedure to investigate SAD (the InterneT-based Stress test for Social Anxiety Disorder; ITSSAD) that can be carried out entirely online by a single investigator, potentially reducing costs and maximising internal reliability. The procedure involves an anticipatory period followed by a naturalistic social interaction task. In a sample of 20 non-treatment-seeking volunteers with symptoms of SAD, the ITSSAD induced significant subjective anxiety and reduced positive affect. Further, increased social anxiety symptoms at baseline predicted increased anxiety during the social interaction task. This protocol needs further validation with physiological measures. The ITSSAD is a new tool for researchers to investigate mechanisms underlying social anxiety disorder