Jing Lu

Cellular senescence lacks a universal marker and varies across cell types, tissues, and stressors, complicating identification. Using SPiDER SA-β-gal labeled single-cell RNA-seq from regenerating mouse muscle, we found that curated gene sets show opposing enrichment patterns in experimentally defined senescent cells, suggesting apparent concordance in prior studies may reflect circular validation. Machine learning classifiers outperformed marker-centric approaches by capturing coordinated transcriptional features largely absent from differentially expressed genes. These features traced senescence progression, positioning senescent cells at late pseudotime with reduced transcriptional entropy. Ligand-receptor analysis identified IGF signaling as a directional axis of secondary senescence from senescent to non-senescent cells. When applied to bulk RNA-seq and an independent aging dataset, the classifier detected age-associated senescence patterns while the entropy-senescence relationship held across most cell types. These findings demonstrate that transcriptome-based classification provides a robust alternative to marker-centric readouts while enabling mechanistic hypothesis generation.

The bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) includes the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with supraphysiological androgen level (SAL). Interestingly, SAL induces cell senescence in PCa cell lines as well as ex vivo in tumor samples of patients. The SAL-mediated cell senescence was shown to be androgen receptor (AR)-dependent and mediated in part by non-genomic AKT signaling. RNA-seq analyses compared with and without SAL treatment as well as by AKT inhibition (AKTi) revealed a specific transcriptome landscape. Comparing the top 100 genes similarly regulated by SAL in two human PCa cell lines that undergo cell senescence and being counteracted by AKTi revealed 33 commonly regulated genes. One gene, ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1 (ERRFI1), encodes the mitogen-inducible gene 6 (MIG6) that is potently upregulated by SAL, whereas the combinatory treatment of SAL with AKTi reverses the SAL-mediated upregulation. Functionally, knockdown of ERRFI1 enhances the pro-survival AKT pathway by enhancing phosphorylation of AKT and the downstream AKT target S6, whereas the phospho-retinoblastoma (pRb) protein levels were decreased. Further, the expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p15^INK4b is enhanced by SAL and ERRFI1 knockdown. In line with this, cell senescence is induced by ERRFI1 knockdown and is enhanced slightly further by SAL. Treatment of SAL in the ERRFI1 knockdown background enhances phosphorylation of both AKT and S6 whereas pRb becomes hypophosphorylated. Interestingly, the ERRFI1 knockdown does not reduce AR protein levels or AR target gene expression, suggesting that MIG6 does not interfere with genomic signaling of AR but represses androgen-induced cell senescence and might therefore counteract SAL-induced signaling. The findings indicate that SAL treatment, used in BAT, upregulates MIG6, which inactivates both pRb and the pro-survival AKT signaling. This indicates a novel negative feedback loop integrating genomic and non-genomic AR signaling.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a major and devastating neurodegenerative disease, and the amyloid-β (Aβ) hypothesis is still the central theory for AD pathogenesis. Meanwhile, another major mental illness, depression, is one of the risk factors for AD. From a high-throughput screening (HTS), amoxapine, a typical secondary amine tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), was identified to reduce Aβ production. A follow-up investigation on antidepressants showed that most of the TCAs harbour similar activity. Previous studies have indicated that TCAs improve cognitive function in AD mouse models as well as in preliminary clinical data; however, the underlying mechanism is controversial, and the effect on Aβ is elusive. Thus, we developed a secondary screening to determine the molecular target of amoxapine, and serotonin receptor 6 (HTR6) was identified. Knockdown of HTR6 reduced the amoxapine’s effect, while the HTR6 antagonist SB258585 mimicked the activity of amoxapine. Further mechanistic study showed that amoxapine and SB258585 reduced Aβ generation through multiple HTR6-mediated targets, including β-arrestin2 and CDK5. Taken together, our study suggests that amoxapine, though no longer a first-line drug for the treatment of depression, may be beneficial for AD and further structural modification of TCAs may lead to desirable therapeutic agents to treat both AD and depression.